Hi Francesco,
2018-04-02 17:31 GMT+02:00 Francesco Poli :
...
> I noticed that you removed yourself from the uploader list, but I was
> hoping someone else from the Debian Science Team was going to step in
> soon... Is this not the case? :-(
...
Well, I hope also.
>>
Control: severity -1 important
On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 20:39:56 +0200 Gert Wollny wrote:
[...]
> These two upstream bugs might also be related:
>
> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/17202
> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/16882
I think the latter (issue
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #894462 [paraview] paraview: edges are blotted [regression]
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
894462: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894462
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 19:51:36 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
Hello Anton! :-)
>
> thanks for bugreport.
You are welcome.
Thanks for your prompt reply!
> The problem with paraview now is that it does
> not actually have any active maintainer
[...]
I noticed that you removed
Am Freitag, den 30.03.2018, 18:01 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli
(wintermute):
> Package: paraview
> Version: 5.4.1+dfsg4-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hello paraview Debian package maintainers,
> thanks for uploading a Debian revision that uses Qt5 rather than
Package: paraview
Version: 5.4.1+dfsg4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello paraview Debian package maintainers,
thanks for uploading a Debian revision that uses Qt5 rather than Qt4!
I've just upgraded to it on my Debian testing box, but I found a bad
regression that