Re: Is there any chance to use rjson instead of RJSONIO in googleVis

Hi again, seems the new version needs some time to show up on CRAN. Is there any chance that you set tags for the release versions on Github which would simplify downloading the tarball a lot? Kind regards Andreas. On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 02:35:11PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: >

RE:

Your e-mail account was LOGIN today by Unknown IP address: 103.240.180.228, CLICK HERE and LOGIN to validate and verify your e-mail account or your account will be temporary blocked. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Processed: Re: rivet: FTBFS on armel/armhf: testsuite failures

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug #813373 [src:rivet] rivet: FTBFS on armel/armhf: testsuite failures Bug reassigned from package 'src:rivet' to 'ftp.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions rivet/1.8.3-1.3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug

Re: Comments regarding python-vispy_0.4.0-1_i386.changes

On 02/07/16 16:40, Chris Lamb wrote: please check vispy/util/svg/geometry.py (and maybe a few others, I stopped looking) /lamby This is covered by: Files: vispy/util/svg/* Copyright: 2013 Nicolas P. Rougier License: BSD-2-Clause All these files have the original copyright of the C++ library

Re: Is there any chance to use rjson instead of RJSONIO in googleVis

Thanks a lot, that's very helpful, Andreas. On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 10:47:55AM +0100, Markus Gesmann wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > Thanks for the little challenge ;-) > > It appears to be straightforward to change googleVis from RJSONIO to jsonlite. > > You can access version 0.6.0 of googleVis

Re: python-vispy_0.4.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED

On 17/06/16 12:59, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Hi Chris, thanks for looking in my package. Please find my comments below: On 16/06/16 20:00, Chris Lamb wrote: please clarify twitter.js, Which file are you referring to? I have: find . -name *.js ./debian/missing-sources/bootstrap.js

Re: Is there any chance to use rjson instead of RJSONIO in googleVis

Hi Andreas, Thanks for the little challenge ;-) It appears to be straightforward to change googleVis from RJSONIO to jsonlite. You can access version 0.6.0 of googleVis (using jsonlite) from GitHub: https://github.com/mages/googleVis. I would very much appreciate, if you could test as well.

Re: Is there any chance to use rjson instead of RJSONIO in googleVis

Hi Markus, On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 10:08:54AM +0200, Markus Gesmann wrote: > We opted for RJSONIO at the time as we believed it is has the better > performance. > > If would start the project today, we would probably go with Jeroen Ooms’ > jsonlite package, which is also MIT, as RJSONIO and

Re: Any chance to replace no-evil JSON code in RJSONIO

Hi Daniel, On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 09:58:23AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > > I'm interested since I want to package other R packages for Debian that > > are depending from RJSONIO (googleVis and others that are depending from > > googleVis). > > > > Can the other packages be adapted to

Re: Any chance to replace no-evil JSON code in RJSONIO

On 01/07/16 09:54, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Duncan, > > Daniel Pocock has kindly created Debian packages for RJSONIO. > Unfortunately these packages are not part of the official Debian > distribution but endet up in non-free due to the unfortunate license > choice MIT-no-evil for

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Am Donnerstag, den 30.06.2016, 11:17 +0100 schrieb Jerome BENOIT: >  > > > > in the meanwhile, according to quantz, the MIA process started some > > time ago (on 2016-05-24), > > > How can we get the current status of the process ?  > This is not supposed to be posted to a public mailing

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:37:14PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > This is not supposed to be posted to a public mailing lists, but as DD > you can logon to qa.debian.org and check there yourself* [1]. > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/MIATeam Except that Jerome is no DD :) --

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

[removing Gianfranco and gladk from Cc, I know they follow these lists] On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:17:34AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > On 08/06/16 09:51, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > in the meanwhile, according to quantz, the MIA process started some > > time ago (on 2016-05-24), > > How

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Hi, On 08/06/16 09:51, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > > >> i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam >> originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science), >> and this one is not. >> >> AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my

Re: Bug#828717: gmp-ecm: 7.0 regresses on 32 bit platforms

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thanks for your report. I believe that the upstream team is working on this issues. Whatever, I am forwarding your report to them. Cheers, Jerome On 27/06/16 07:33, Martin Pitt wrote: > Package: gmp-ecm > Version: 7.0.1+ds-2 > Severity: important >

Processed: RE: FTBFS with GCC 6: could not convert a from x to y

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch  Bug #811682 [gtkmathview] FTBFS with GCC 6: could not convert a from x to y Added tag(s) patch. -- 811682: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811682 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --

Re: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Thorsten, fixed and re-uploaded. Thanks a lot for checking Andreas. On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 01:00:24PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > for whatever reason the fileheader of R/bptest.sarlm.R does not match the > entry in your debian/copyright.

Processed: Re: Bug#827918: gnuplot: Obsolete and incorrect NEWS.Debian should be removed

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 827918 +pending Bug #827918 [gnuplot] gnuplot: Obsolete and incorrect NEWS.Debian should be removed Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 827918:

Processed: Re: pdl: FTBFS with Perl 5.24: t/pptest.t has $^W as binary

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 825425 pdl/1:2.016-1~exp2 Bug #825425 [pdl] pdl: FTBFS with Perl 5.24: t/pptest.t has $^W as binary Marked as fixed in versions pdl/1:2.016-1~exp2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 825425:

Processed: Re: pdl: FTBFS on hurd-i386: testsuite failures

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 823203 pdl/1:2.016-1~exp2 Bug #823203 [src:pdl] pdl: FTBFS on hurd-i386: testsuite failures Marked as fixed in versions pdl/1:2.016-1~exp2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 823203:

Processed: Re: pdl: Stored data files unreadable

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 811247 pdl/1:2.016-1~exp2 Bug #811247 [pdl] pdl: Stored data files unreadable Marked as fixed in versions pdl/1:2.016-1~exp2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 811247:

Re: ntl_9.9.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, On 17/06/2016 20:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Sorry, but only the pointer to /usr/share/common-licenses is ok. Otherwise the complete license text needs to be in the license block. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were

Processed: Re: Bug#826732: gnuplot-nox: gnuplot-nox uninstallable

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 826732 +unreproducible Bug #826732 [gnuplot-nox] gnuplot-nox: gnuplot-nox uninstallable Added tag(s) unreproducible. > fixed 826732 5.0.3+dfsg3-5 Bug #826732 [gnuplot-nox] gnuplot-nox: gnuplot-nox uninstallable Marked as fixed in versions

Re: ntl_9.9.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Thorsten, >unfortunately I have to reject your package. >Please mention the license of > ntl-9.9.0/src/GetTime0.c >in your debian/copyright. FYI, we fixed this, and the package is again in new queue (in case you have already reviewed it, this might save some time to review from another

Re: python-vispy_0.4.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Chris, thanks for looking in my package. Please find my comments below: On 16/06/16 20:00, Chris Lamb wrote: please clarify twitter.js, Which file are you referring to? I have: >>> find . -name *.js ./debian/missing-sources/bootstrap.js ./debian/missing-sources/vispy.js

Re: Could Debian Perl team take over PDL?

On 06/03/2016 10:55 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 06/03/2016 10:07 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: >> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:02:32PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> I've got a request from PDL upstream who fully correctly noticed that >>> PDL is not properly maintained inside Debian. Since I

RE:

I have a proposal for you, Email me back via: m8597...@outlook.com This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in

Processed: Re: Bug#826701: gnuplot-data: Version 5.0.3+dfsg3-1 tries to overwrite a file which is also in package gnuplot-tex 4.6.6-3

Processing control commands: > found -1 5.0.3+dfsg3-2 Bug #826701 {Done: Anton Gladky } [gnuplot-data] gnuplot-data: Version 5.0.3+dfsg3-1 tries to overwrite a file which is also in package gnuplot-tex 4.6.6-3 Marked as found in versions gnuplot/5.0.3+dfsg3-2; no longer marked

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2016, 11:59 +0100 schrieb Jerome BENOIT: > Thanks for the reply. > > On 08/06/16 10:40, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working > > > > > the [surface] evolver package ? > > > > A bug with patches

Processed: Re: Bug#826721: gnuplot-x11: update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/share/gnuplot/gnuplot.gih is already managed by gnuplot4

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 826721 5.0.3+dfsg3-2 Bug #826721 [gnuplot-x11] gnuplot-x11: update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/share/gnuplot/gnuplot.gih is already managed by gnuplot4 Marked as fixed in versions gnuplot/5.0.3+dfsg3-2. > thanks Stopping

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Hi, >Right now the package rocks. >But the upstream version is (very) old, and the Debian package material >clearly needs some refreshment. Is a patch really appropriate here ? >May I rather wait for clear orphaning instead ? I see (2.30 VS 2.70)... what about: gbp import-dscs --debsnap

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Thanks for the reply. On 08/06/16 10:40, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > >> May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working > >> the [surface] evolver package ? > > A bug with patches should be enough, ITA means somebody orphaning the package > and only the

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Hi, >May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working >the [surface] evolver package ? A bug with patches should be enough, ITA means somebody orphaning the package and only the maintainer/MIA team can do it. But a bug with patches and you proposing the maintainership is

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Hi, On 08/06/16 09:51, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > > >> i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam >> originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science), >> and this one is not. >> >> AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Hi, >i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam >originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science), and this >one is not. > >AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my point of >view, it will not be too offensive, if evolver will be moved

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Hi, i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science), and this one is not. AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my point of view, it will not be too offensive, if evolver will be moved under the

Re: Bug#790327: openturns: FTBFS on mipsel "package requires more than 1GB RAM; do not build on mips/mipsel. Stop."

Hello Denir. Thanks for your reply. I don't remember why it tooked 46 hours. I suppose it was due to my limited hardware (CI20 board). I just have 1 GB of RAM, so I had to use a lot of swap memory. Also, the 500GB of swap memory was some mispell. I suppose it should be 5GB. If you have a

Processed: Re: Bug#790327: openturns: FTBFS on mipsel "package requires more than 1GB RAM; do not build on mips/mipsel. Stop."

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 790327 wontfix Bug #790327 [openturns] openturns: FTBFS on mipsel "package requires more than 1GB RAM; do not build on mips/mipsel. Stop." Added tag(s) wontfix. > severity 790327 wishlist Bug #790327 [openturns] openturns: FTBFS on mipsel

Re: Bug#790327: openturns: FTBFS on mipsel "package requires more than 1GB RAM; do not build on mips/mipsel. Stop."

tags 790327 wontfix severity 790327 wishlist thanks On 2015-08-03 10:09 GMT+02:00 Gustavo Prado Alkmim wrote: > Hi. > > Please, can you take a look on the patch? It is building ok on mips now. [...] >>> I enabled the build on mipsel. I made a test on my ci20 board and it >>> built fine. >>> >>>

RE: UPGRADE

IT Administrator has currently upgraded all mailboxes (size to 20.0GB). Please upgrade your account by Simply Click Here To Expand Helpdesk.

Re: Bug#806864: mlpack: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (can't cd to debian/mlpack-bin/usr/bin)

Version: 2.0.1-1 This seems fixed because I have a successful build for this version. I guess it was commit 507024ba6b9914265b5424c295363f72be9736db which fixed this. mlpack (2.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/rules - remove code to prefix binaries with mlpack_, as this is now

Re: Could Debian Perl team take over PDL?

Hi- I'm not that familiar with the Debian side of things but am standing up a Debian system this weekend and hoping to take a look at updating the previous work by Henning Glawe. If you have any PDL specific questions, please feel free to email me directly. --Chris (PDL-2.016 release

Re: Could Debian Perl team take over PDL?

On 06/03/2016 10:07 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:02:32PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: >> I've got a request from PDL upstream who fully correctly noticed that >> PDL is not properly maintained inside Debian. Since I once did some >> ad-hoc fixes Upstream CCed me whether I

Re: Could Debian Perl team take over PDL?

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:02:32PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Perl team, > > I've got a request from PDL upstream who fully correctly noticed that > PDL is not properly maintained inside Debian. Since I once did some > ad-hoc fixes Upstream CCed me whether I could do something as Debian >

Re: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Roger, thanks for the information. I've uploaded the changes to the Debian new queue. Kind regards Andreas. On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:43:24PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > spdep_0.6-5 submitted to CRAN. > > Roger > > > On Tue, 31 May 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: > >

Processed: Re: Bug#825923: python-nltk: nltk/tokenize/api.py imports ntlk.six which has been dropped

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #825923 [python-nltk] python-nltk: nltk/tokenize/api.py imports ntlk.six which has been dropped Added tag(s) patch. > tags -1 pending Bug #825923 [python-nltk] python-nltk: nltk/tokenize/api.py imports ntlk.six which has been dropped Ignoring

Re: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Roger, thanks for your work on this issue. I confirm that you have removed the file in question from SVN and removed the usage of the compute_soi function from init.c and the function prototype from spdep.h. From my perspective this should deal with the complaints Debian ftpmaster had. I've

Re: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

I've now spent three hours complying, IMHO far more than was sensible. The questioned code is gone, despite my not agreeing with your complaints, nor seeing that you were willing to contribute a replacement. Check out spdep from R-Forge, and reply rapidly confirming that no further changes are

Re: clapack_3.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Thorsten, thanks for the fast processing. > please remove clapack-3.2.1-CMAKE/INSTALL/psfig.tex from a package Done and re-uploaded. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org h

Re: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Roger, On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:51:57PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote: > Please tell them that I am not willing to make any further changes. If they > bothered to look, they would have seen that the functions are not simply > copied from arm.c, but modified to use double rather than integer >

Re: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andreas, Please tell them that I am not willing to make any further changes. If they bothered to look, they would have seen that the functions are not simply copied from arm.c, but modified to use double rather than integer coordinates. I can add arm.c for documentation and change the

Re: Could Debian Perl team take over PDL? (Was: Fwd: PDL package update request (who is appropriate POC?))

We've just released PDL-2.016. https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/mailman/message/35124607/ --Chris On 5/30/2016 06:02, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Perl team, I've got a request from PDL upstream who fully correctly noticed that PDL is not properly maintained inside Debian. Since I once did some

Re: python-escript_4.2.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hello Thorsten, good catch with doc/user/listings.cfg. I've removed listings.cfg (since it appears to be unnecessary) and have modified d/copyright as you suggest. I wasn't sure of the procedure (since the previous commits were not accepted) so I have just bumped the date on the top

Re: Fwd: PDL package update request (who is appropriate POC?)

Thanks for the quick response, Andreas. We're planning a new PDL-2.016 release by the end of May but as far as Debian packaging goes, nothing will change from PDL-2.015 to PDL-2.16 compared to the current debian/ directory in the PDL distribution. I reviewed the contents of that folder and it

Re: Fwd: PDL package update request (who is appropriate POC?)

Hi Chris, On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 02:31:40PM -0400, Chris Marshall wrote: > I saw that you have had activity with the Debian pdl packaging > from 15 Jan 2016. I'm hoping to update the pdl package from > the current version PDL-2.007 to the soon to be released > PDL-2.016. > > PDL-2.007 is more

Processed: Re: Bug#819714

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #819714 {Done: Gianfranco Costamagna } [src:vtk6] nifti2dicom: FTBFS: No rule to make target '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libproj.so' Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #819714 to the same values

Re: python-escript_4.2.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Thorsten, thank you for your notes. I fixed all those problems and uploaded the package again. Best regards Anton 2016-05-22 20:00 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Alteholz < ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org>: > > Hi Joel, > > unfortunately I have to reject your package. > Please add the license

Processed: Re: Bug#824711: coin3: the debian/copyright file incorrectly labels the license texts

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 824711 +pending Bug #824711 [coin3] coin3: the debian/copyright file incorrectly labels the license texts Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 824711:

Processed: Re: Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 799262 Bug #823140 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP] 823140 was blocked by: 795841 823140 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 823140: 799262 -- 823140:

Re: calculix-cgx_2.10.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Thorsten, thanks for this note. The new fixed version is uploaded to NEW. Regards Anton 2016-05-17 16:00 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Alteholz < ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org>: > > Hi Wolfgang, > > unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the > licenses of: >

Re: Sponsor wanted for irstlm/6.00.05-2

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:43:18PM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote: > On 17/05/2016 09:55, Giulio Paci wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > after a few requests to move irstlm package under Debian Science, I > > finally moved it. :-) > > > > I just pushed a new 6.00.05-2 release that should be ready for

Re: Sponsor wanted for irstlm/6.00.05-2

On 17/05/2016 09:55, Giulio Paci wrote: > Hi everybody, > after a few requests to move irstlm package under Debian Science, I finally > moved it. :-) > > I just pushed a new 6.00.05-2 release that should be ready for upload. Ops... I forgot to mention that I pushed the package at:

Re: python-escript_4.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Thorsten, upstream agreed to relicense the package under Apache 2.0 license. The new version is pushed to Debian New Queue. Best regards Anton 2016-02-09 15:00 GMT+01:00 Thorsten Alteholz < ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org>: > > Hi Joel, > > unfortunately i have to reject your package. > As

Re Verification

This is to inform you that a letter was sent to this mailbox some few minutes ago. It was received with a high intensity of privacy and the sender as marked this letter to contain important and private information. To make sure that the person who is about to read this message is the owner of

Re: hdf-compass_0.6.0b5-1_amd64.changes is NEW

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:16:19AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Could you guys hold off the review upload. I still need to sort something > out with the d-python team. Hmmm, you get this mail since it actually *is* uploaded. :-) You have two options: 1. Ask ftpmaster for rejection.

Re: hdf-compass_0.6.0b5-1_amd64.changes is NEW

Could you guys hold off the review upload. I still need to sort something out with the d-python team. Many thanks, Ghis Le 15 mai 2016 07:33, "Debian FTP Masters" a écrit : > binary:hdf-compass is NEW. > binary:python-hdf-compass is NEW. > source:hdf-compass is

Processed: Re: Bug#745237 closed by Anton Gladky <gl...@debian.org> (Bug#745237: fixed in freecad 0.14.3702+dfsg-2)

Processing control commands: > found -1 freecad/0.16+dfsg1-1 Bug #745237 [freecad] freecad: unclear situation w.r.t. example files (source package vs. binary packages vs. debian/copyright) Marked as found in versions freecad/0.16+dfsg1-1. -- 745237:

Re: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Roger, I'm afraid I need to come back to you again about the licensing of the file in question in the spdep package. Please read below what the Debian ftpmasters think about the license: On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:00:23PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > ok, one step

Re: Regarding VTK 7.0.0

Den 25 feb 2016 12:59 em skrev "Ghislain Vaillant" : > > I will try to find some time to send an email around to the team this > weekend. Hi Ghis, Did you ever get around to this? If so, what was the team reaction? Any estimate on when vtk7/python3-vtk7/python-vtk7 packages

Processed: Re: Bug#817785: libqglviewer2: libs built against qt5 should have -qt5 appended

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 817785 +pending Bug #817785 [libqglviewer2] libqglviewer2: libs built against qt5 should have -qt5 appended Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 817785:

Processed: Re: Bug#823816: freecad: New upstream version available

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 823816 +pending Bug #823816 [src:freecad] freecad: New upstream version available Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 823816:

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#822321: crashes when importing VRML file (containing PROTO)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 346182  Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > reassign 346182 libvtk6.2 Bug #346182 {Done: Debian FTP Masters } [python-vtk] crashes when importing VRML file (containing PROTO) Bug #539362

Re: Bug#823381: ITP: r-cran-markdown -- GNU R package providing R bindings to the Sundown Markdown rendering library

Closing this ITP again since it was just issued as #813481 On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 08:27:12AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Andreas Tille > > * Package name: r-cran-markdown > Version : 0.7.7 > Upstream Author :

Processed: Re: elmer: fails to remove: rmdir: failed to remove '/usr/share/ElmerGUI/edf': Directory not empty

Processing control commands: > tags -1 -pending -fixed Bug #720146 [elmer] elmer: fails to remove: rmdir: failed to remove '/usr/share/ElmerGUI/edf': Directory not empty Removed tag(s) pending. Bug #720146 [elmer] elmer: fails to remove: rmdir: failed to remove '/usr/share/ElmerGUI/edf':

Re: Bug#806873: roboptim-core: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (24 tests failed out of 24)

> <>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/Development/visualization-gnuplot-differentiable-function > Unable to find executable: > /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/visualization-gnuplot-differentiable-function > 24/24 Test #24: visualization-gnuplot-differentiable-function ...***Not Run > 0.00 sec > > 0%

Re: vmtk_1.3-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 04:00:27PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi Mattia, Hi ta :) > at least vmtk-1.3/distribution/egg/windows_dll/*/msvcp110.dll doesn't > seem to be distributable. So I am afraid they must be removed from the > source tarball. FTR, this source is already in the

Processed: Re: r-cran-tgp: FTBFS: cmath:171:3: error: template with C linkage

Processing control commands: > tags -1 = sid stretch Bug #820866 [src:r-cran-tgp] r-cran-tgp: FTBFS: cmath:171:3: error: template with C linkage Added tag(s) sid and stretch; removed tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible. -- 820866: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820866 Debian

Processed: Re: Bug#822134: Boost 1.55 to be removed; your attention required

Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 Bug #822134 [kig] Boost 1.55 to be removed; your attention required Bug 822134 cloned as bug 822962 822521 was blocked by: 822129 822125 822136 822122 822131 822133 822135 822123 822132 822121 822128 822126 822130 822138 822134 822120 822521 was not

Processed: Re: singular: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No such file or directory)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 806108 important Bug #806108 [src:singular] singular: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No such file or directory) Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Re: Bug#752876: Comments regarding r-cran-spdep_0.5-92-1_amd64.changes

Hi Roger, just to leave your quick and helpful reply not unanswered: I was hoping for faster processing to be able to answer your question whether further changes are needed. For the moment I just say thanks for your kind cooperation and I might (or hopefully might not) come back to you in case

Processed: Re: Bug#820815 closed by Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos <eftax...@otenet.gr> (Bug#820815: fixed in freefem++ 3.46+dfsg1-1)

versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer marked as fixed in versions freefem++/3.46+dfsg1-1. -- 820815: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820815 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- debian-science-maintainers mai

Processed: Re: ngspice: FTBFS with nonexistant $HOME

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending patch Bug #813119 [src:ngspice] ngspice: FTBFS with nonexistant $HOME Added tag(s) pending. -- 813119: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813119 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --

Processed: Re: libopencv-highgui-dev: Should not depend on libgtk2.0-dev

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #817017 [libopencv-highgui-dev] libopencv-highgui-dev: Should not depend on libgtk2.0-dev Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 817017: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=817017 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

RE: UPGRADE

IT Administrator has currently upgraded all mailboxes (size to 20.0GB). Please upgrade your account by Simply Click Here To Expand

Processed: Re: Bug#822383: gringo: FTBFS: error: 'pow' is not a member of 'std'

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 822383 https://sourceforge.net/p/potassco/bugs/118/ Bug #822383 [gringo] gringo: FTBFS: error: 'pow' is not a member of 'std' Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://sourceforge.net/p/potassco/bugs/118/'. > End of message, stopping

Processed: Re: Bug#822120: Boost 1.55 to be removed; your attention required

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #822120 [feel++] Boost 1.55 to be removed; your attention required Added tag(s) pending. > severity -1 serious Bug #822120 [feel++] Boost 1.55 to be removed; your attention required Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 822120:

Processed: Re: Bug#821876: libfeel++-dev: Depends on libvtk5-dev, which will be removed

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #821876 [libfeel++-dev] libfeel++-dev: Depends on libvtk5-dev, which will be removed Added tag(s) pending. -- 821876: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821876 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: r-cran-tgp: FTBFS: cmath:171:3: error: template with C linkage

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible Bug #820866 [src:r-cran-tgp] r-cran-tgp: FTBFS: cmath:171:3: error: template with C linkage Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible. -- 820866: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820866 Debian Bug Tracking System

Processed: Re: elmerfem: FTBFS now also on amd64...

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #754713 [src:elmerfem] elmerfem: FTBFS on powrpc, ppc64el, s390x, hppa: The MPI version needs parpack. Disabling MPI. Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 754713 to the same value. -- 754713:

Processed: Re: Bug#821419: paraview: FTBFS against ffmpeg 3.0

Processing control commands: > tag -1 upstream patch Bug #821419 [src:paraview] paraview: FTBFS against ffmpeg 3.0 Added tag(s) patch and upstream. > forwarded -1 http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=16001 Bug #821419 [src:paraview] paraview: FTBFS against ffmpeg 3.0 Set Bug

Processed: Re: Bug#821411: vmtk: bump soname without package name change

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #821411 [src:vmtk] vmtk: bump soname without package name change Added tag(s) pending. -- 821411: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821411 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --

Re: Comments regarding pyfr_1.3.0-1_amd64.changes

On 18/04/16 11:02, Chris Lamb wrote: Please check (at least) doc/ext/tikz.py Indeed, I missed that file (BSD-2-Clause). Double-checked the output of licensecheck and I could not find any other files that slipped under my radar. I'll update the packaging accordingly. Thanks for spotting this

Processed: Re: dolfin-bin: FEniCS/DOLFIN fails to compile Python dolfin.Expression()

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 782029 libsuitesparse-metis-dev Bug #782029 [dolfin-bin] dolfin-bin: FEniCS/DOLFIN fails to compile Python dolfin.Expression() Bug reassigned from package 'dolfin-bin' to 'libsuitesparse-metis-dev'. No longer marked as found in versions

Processed: Re: Bug#806198: siscone: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (dh_testroot in build-indep)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 806198 + patch Bug #806198 [src:siscone] siscone: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (dh_testroot in build-indep) Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 806198:

Processed: Re: woo: FTBFS with libc 2.23: 'isnan' was not declared in this scope (patch)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch  Bug #818817 [woo] woo: FTBFS with libc 2.23: 'isnan' was not declared in this scope Added tag(s) patch. -- 818817: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818817 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --

Processed: Re: libgmp-dev: please reinstate lib64gmp-dev on ppc64

: "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>} [libgmp-dev] libgmp-dev: please reinstate lib64gmp-dev on ppc64 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened N

Re: Wrong pristine-tar files in some r-cran-* repositories [Was: r-cran-httpuv_1.3.3-3~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED]

Hi Andreas, Thanks for your help; I'll get to it soonish. Bye, Joost PS: I see you like landscape pictures; I offer you http://plaatjes.mdcc.cx/2011/20110528-serbia_tara_mountains/IMG_7039.JPG . On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:57:51PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Joost, > > I tried to upload

Processed: Re: Bug#816101: petsc: FTBFS on mipsel - broken openmpi breaks petsc build

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 816101 Bug #816101 {Done: Drew Parsons } [src:petsc] FTBFS on mipsel - broken openmpi breaks petsc build Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #816101 to the same values previously set > found

Bug#818990: Re: About bug #818990

On 12/04/2016 20:08, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 07:47:23PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: What could be the difference? Don't know, sorry. Good luck! Well, does the box run unstable too? that box is a standard jessie system running standard chroots (either testing,

Bug#818990: Re: About bug #818990

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 07:47:23PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: > >>What could be the difference? > > > >Don't know, sorry. Good luck! > > Well, does the box run unstable too? that box is a standard jessie system running standard chroots (either testing, unstable or experimental) through pbuilder.

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >