Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Whoop whoop! Thanks everyone! [1] https://packages.debian.org/experimental/libvtk7-dev On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:55 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Gert et al., > > Thanks again for re-uploading; I have just ACCEPTed it. > > > [I] replicated here what I did, kind of to acknowledge

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Gert et al., Thanks again for re-uploading; I have just ACCEPTed it. > [I] replicated here what I did, kind of to acknowledge the review and > the changes it required (a habit from scinetific paper reviews, nothing > more) Thanks! I was mostly making sure for next time; it is a good habit

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Am Montag, den 02.04.2018, 19:53 +0100 schrieb Chris Lamb: > Hi Gert, > > > > The comments were listed as being "for" version 7.1.1+dfsg1- > > > 1~exp1 — > > > did you upload with the same version number? That would explain > > > why I > > > thought they remained unaddressed. > > > > Yes, I did

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Gert, > > The comments were listed as being "for" version 7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1 — > > did you upload with the same version number? That would explain why I > > thought they remained unaddressed. > > Yes, I did upload with the same version. The policy is not clear about > this Oh, this has

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hello Chris, Am Freitag, den 30.03.2018, 15:56 +0100 schrieb Chris Lamb: > Hi all, > > > these are the comments I got last year > > The comments were listed as being "for" version 7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1 — > did you upload with the same version number? That would explain why I > thought they

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi all, > these are the comments I got last year The comments were listed as being "for" version 7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1 — did you upload with the same version number? That would explain why I thought they remained unaddressed. If so, please re-upload and ping me and I will happily take a look. :)

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Am 29.03.2018 18:00 schrieb "Chris Lamb" : > > > Forwarding notes, please include Luca in any reply. See, also: > > Thu 29 16:38 < mapreri> lamby: can I ask you to either *) forward me the > comments and I'll see what to do next *) accept and open a bunch of RC

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Wait, VTK7 is no longer in NEW [1]. Does anyone know what happened? Cheers, Nico [1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:28 PM Gert Wollny wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 06.03.2018, 21:37 + schrieb Nico Schlömer: > > Perhaps it's time to bring

vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Forwarding notes, please include Luca in any reply. See, also: Thu 29 16:38 < mapreri> lamby: can I ask you to either *) forward me the comments and I'll see what to do next *) accept and open a bunch of RC bugs as needed *) plain reject with those comments. Whatever feels more sensible

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Am Dienstag, den 06.03.2018, 21:37 + schrieb Nico Schlömer: > Perhaps it's time to bring this up again. At six months in the queue, > VTK7 has been the leader in the NEW queue for a while now. It'd be > great if we could work on this again, particularly since VTK8 is > already out there. I

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Perhaps it's time to bring this up again. At six months in the queue, VTK7 has been the leader in the NEW queue for a while now. It'd be great if we could work on this again, particularly since VTK8 is already out there. Cheers, Nico On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:56 AM Gert Wollny

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hello Luca, since you did the initial review of the VTK7 package (and it is a really big one), would you consider to have another look at the updated version soon, I ask because we would like to start porting dependent packages. All the issuses you raised should be addressed by now (although

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hello Luca, thanks for your work on this. One comment though: Am Freitag, den 01.09.2017, 23:00 + schrieb Luca Falavigna: > * Please mention license of the font under > Charts/Core/Testing/Data/Fonts I don't see a font file in this directory, only a md5 hash sum file. Best, Gert --

vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, * Accelerators/Dax/* have different copyright terms than the one mentioned in d/copyright * Please mention license of the font under Charts/Core/Testing/Data/Fonts * Common/Core/CaseFolding.txt is licensed under http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html * Examples/GUI/QT/* are copyright Sandia