Bug#845082: (no subject)

Hi Graham, On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:08:10 +0200 Graham Inggs wrote: > On 29 November 2016 at 00:29, Breno Leitao wrote: > > We just created a pull request to have this fixed upstream. > > Thanks! > > > Should we create a Debian patch also? > > This bug is

givaro_4.0.2-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:13:31 + Source: givaro Binary: libgivaro-dev libgivaro9 libgivaro-doc givaro-user-doc givaro-dev-doc Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 4.0.2-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium

Processing of givaro_4.0.2-5_amd64.changes

givaro_4.0.2-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: givaro_4.0.2-5.dsc givaro_4.0.2-5.debian.tar.xz givaro-dev-doc_4.0.2-5_all.deb givaro-user-doc_4.0.2-5_all.deb givaro_4.0.2-5_amd64.buildinfo libgivaro-dev_4.0.2-5_amd64.deb

Bug#840458: marked as done (linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly})

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:21:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#840458: fixed in givaro 4.0.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #840458, regarding linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly} to be marked as done.

givaro_4.0.2-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:01:05 -0500 Source: givaro Binary: libgivaro-dev libgivaro9 libgivaro-doc givaro-user-doc givaro-dev-doc Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 4.0.2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium

Processing of givaro_4.0.2-4_amd64.changes

givaro_4.0.2-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: givaro_4.0.2-4.dsc givaro_4.0.2-4.debian.tar.xz givaro-dev-doc_4.0.2-4_all.deb givaro-user-doc_4.0.2-4_all.deb givaro_4.0.2-4_amd64.buildinfo libgivaro-dev_4.0.2-4_amd64.deb

Bug#840458: [Debian-science-sagemath] linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra, charpoly}

Yes, please do. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016, 1:52 PM Tobias Hansen wrote: > On 11/29/2016 06:01 PM, Tobias Hansen wrote: > > On 11/29/2016 03:53 PM, Doug Torrance wrote: > >> Control: reassign -1 src:givaro > >> > >> On 11/29/2016 09:58 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote: > >>> I think I

Bug#840458: [Debian-science-sagemath] linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra, charpoly}

On 11/29/2016 06:01 PM, Tobias Hansen wrote: > On 11/29/2016 03:53 PM, Doug Torrance wrote: >> Control: reassign -1 src:givaro >> >> On 11/29/2016 09:58 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote: >>> I think I figured out at least the test failures with "Illegal >>> instruction" on i386. The problem is that givaro

r-cran-rnetcdf_1.8-2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:20:05 +0100 Source: r-cran-rnetcdf Binary: r-cran-rnetcdf Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.8-2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers

Processing of r-cran-rnetcdf_1.8-2-1_amd64.changes

r-cran-rnetcdf_1.8-2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: r-cran-rnetcdf_1.8-2-1.dsc r-cran-rnetcdf_1.8-2.orig.tar.gz r-cran-rnetcdf_1.8-2-1.debian.tar.xz r-cran-rnetcdf-dbgsym_1.8-2-1_amd64.deb r-cran-rnetcdf_1.8-2-1_amd64.buildinfo

r-cran-arm_1.9-3-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:54:00 +0100 Source: r-cran-arm Binary: r-cran-arm Architecture: source all Version: 1.9-3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Team

Processing of r-cran-arm_1.9-3-1_amd64.changes

r-cran-arm_1.9-3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: r-cran-arm_1.9-3-1.dsc r-cran-arm_1.9-3.orig.tar.gz r-cran-arm_1.9-3-1.debian.tar.xz r-cran-arm_1.9-3-1_all.deb r-cran-arm_1.9-3-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Bug#840458: linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra, charpoly}

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 02:58:53PM +, Tobias Hansen wrote: >... > (I'm not sure if some of these flags (mmx, sse ?) are allowed > on i386 and didn't find that info. Ximin, do you know this?) None of these is allowed on i386. The baseline for i386 in stretch is the Pentium Pro, that has

Bug#840458: linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra, charpoly}

On 11/29/2016 03:53 PM, Doug Torrance wrote: > Control: reassign -1 src:givaro > > On 11/29/2016 09:58 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote: >> I think I figured out at least the test failures with "Illegal >> instruction" on i386. The problem is that givaro is built using cpu >> extensions that are not

r-cran-lavaan_0.5.22-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:40:14 +0100 Source: r-cran-lavaan Binary: r-cran-lavaan Architecture: source all Version: 0.5.22-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Team

Processing of r-cran-lavaan_0.5.22-1_amd64.changes

r-cran-lavaan_0.5.22-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: r-cran-lavaan_0.5.22-1.dsc r-cran-lavaan_0.5.22.orig.tar.gz r-cran-lavaan_0.5.22-1.debian.tar.xz r-cran-lavaan_0.5.22-1_all.deb r-cran-lavaan_0.5.22-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your

Bug#845082: numexpr FTBFS on ppc64el: test failures

X-Debbugs-Cc: gin...@debian.org, bren...@br.ibm.com On 11/29/2016 03:18 PM, Fernando Seiti Furusato wrote: > Also I had to consider a ci failure on appveyor, that is why I also > included a verification for msvc version on the PR. By the way, it has been merged upstream. signature.asc

r-cran-modelmetrics_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:r-cran-modelmetrics is NEW. binary:r-cran-modelmetrics is NEW. source:r-cran-modelmetrics is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are

Bug#845082: numexpr FTBFS on ppc64el: test failures

Hello. At first I tried to fix that with round(). Problem is round() returns the same type as the argument so the cast happens anyway. I would recommend using the latest version, with llround(), which returns long long. Also I had to consider a ci failure on appveyor, that is why I also included

Processing of r-cran-modelmetrics_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes

r-cran-modelmetrics_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: r-cran-modelmetrics_1.1.0-1.dsc r-cran-modelmetrics_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz r-cran-modelmetrics_1.1.0-1.debian.tar.xz r-cran-modelmetrics-dbgsym_1.1.0-1_amd64.deb

Status of r-cran-caret

Hi Balint, as announced[1] I'm trying to update Debian Science R packages to have a set of up to date R packages at freeze time. When I had a look into r-cran-caret I noticed that the new version needs a new Build-Depends r-cran-modelmetrics. I mentioned this in my proposed changes in Git in

dimbl 0.15-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the dimbl source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 0.15-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will

ucto 0.9.3-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the ucto source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.9.3-1 Current version: 0.9.3-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive

r-cran-estimability 1.2-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the r-cran-estimability source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.1-1-1 Current version: 1.2-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 840458 src:linbox Bug #840458 [src:givaro] linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly} Added indication that 840458 affects src:linbox > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Overhaul of r-cran-yaml package

Hi Joost, as announced[1] I'm trying to update Debian Science R packages to have a set of up to date R packages at freeze time. When I had a look into r-cran-yaml which has a newer upstream as well I was stumbling upon the fact that you are deleting unneeded files inside a pre-build target in

Bug#840458: linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra, charpoly}

Control: reassign -1 src:givaro On 11/29/2016 09:58 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote: I think I figured out at least the test failures with "Illegal instruction" on i386. The problem is that givaro is built using cpu extensions that are not allowed. Jerome figured out in [1] that the problem happens

Processed: Re: linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly}

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:givaro Bug #840458 [src:linbox] linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly} Bug reassigned from package 'src:linbox' to 'src:givaro'. No longer marked as found in versions linbox/1.4.2-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed

r-cran-gbm_2.1.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:24:04 +0100 Source: r-cran-gbm Binary: r-cran-gbm Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.1.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers

Processing of r-cran-gbm_2.1.1-1_amd64.changes

r-cran-gbm_2.1.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: r-cran-gbm_2.1.1-1.dsc r-cran-gbm_2.1.1.orig.tar.gz r-cran-gbm_2.1.1-1.debian.tar.xz r-cran-gbm-dbgsym_2.1.1-1_amd64.deb r-cran-gbm_2.1.1-1_amd64.buildinfo r-cran-gbm_2.1.1-1_amd64.deb Greetings,

petsc_3.7.4+dfsg1-7_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 22:28:10 +0800 Source: petsc Binary: libpetsc3.7-dev libpetsc3.7.4-dev petsc-dev libpetsc3.7.4 libpetsc3.7.4-dbg petsc3.7.4-doc libpetsc-complex-3.7-dev libpetsc-complex-3.7.4-dev

Bug#840458: linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra, charpoly}

Hi Doug, I think I figured out at least the test failures with "Illegal instruction" on i386. The problem is that givaro is built using cpu extensions that are not allowed. Jerome figured out in [1] that the problem happens when givaro code is called. And sure enough: objdump -S

Processing of petsc_3.7.4+dfsg1-7_source.changes

petsc_3.7.4+dfsg1-7_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: petsc_3.7.4+dfsg1-7.dsc petsc_3.7.4+dfsg1-7.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Processing of slepc_3.7.3+dfsg1-3_source.changes

slepc_3.7.3+dfsg1-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: slepc_3.7.3+dfsg1-3.dsc slepc_3.7.3+dfsg1-3.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Bug#846240: ITP: r-cran-modelmetrics -- GNU R Rapid Calculation of Model Metrics

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: r-cran-modelmetrics Version : 1.1.0 Upstream Author : Tyler Hunt * URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=ModelMetrics * License : GPL

Bug#846239: dh-r: PLease do not insert ', ,' sequence in d/control

Package: dh-r Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi Gordon, in case of an empty $rdepends string dh-make-R injects ', ,' into Build-Depends which is a syntax error in d/control. This patch diff --git a/scripts/dh-make-R b/scripts/dh-make-R index dbd0419..4908e53 100755 --- a/scripts/dh-make-R +++

armadillo_7.500.2+dfsg-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:40:29 +0530 Source: armadillo Binary: libarmadillo-dev libarmadillo7 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:7.500.2+dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science

r-cran-qvcalc_0.9-0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:02:14 +0100 Source: r-cran-qvcalc Binary: r-cran-qvcalc Architecture: source all Version: 0.9-0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers

Processing of r-cran-qvcalc_0.9-0-1_amd64.changes

r-cran-qvcalc_0.9-0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: r-cran-qvcalc_0.9-0-1.dsc r-cran-qvcalc_0.9-0.orig.tar.gz r-cran-qvcalc_0.9-0-1.debian.tar.xz r-cran-qvcalc_0.9-0-1_all.deb r-cran-qvcalc_0.9-0-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian

r-cran-formatr_1.4-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:39:53 +0100 Source: r-cran-formatr Binary: r-cran-formatr Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Team

Processing of r-cran-formatr_1.4-1_amd64.changes

r-cran-formatr_1.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: r-cran-formatr_1.4-1.dsc r-cran-formatr_1.4.orig.tar.gz r-cran-formatr_1.4-1.debian.tar.xz r-cran-formatr_1.4-1_amd64.buildinfo r-cran-formatr_1.4-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian

Please use distribution "UNRELEASED" in the headline of a paragraph

Hi Joost, I was checking the Debian Maintainers dashboard for Debian Science team[1] (every maintainer in the team should have a look there from time to time ;-)). I noticed that your package r-cran-semtools was listed as vcs New version: ready for upload The reason for this is

Re

Greetings, I am Mrs. Selina Aurel, and I have a confidential Project to discuss with you. Kindly get in touch with me immediately to give you the details. Mrs. Selina Aurel.

Bug#846194: RM: r-cran-rprotobuf [mips64el] -- ROM; Does not build on mips64el

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi ftpmasters, the latest version of r-cran-rprotobuf does not build on mips64el. While this needs to be sorted out with upstream I'd prefer to remove the package from this archive meanwhile. Kind regards and thanks for your ftpmaster work