++ has reverse-dependencies in the
archive, in Ubuntu we've proceeded with a package rename for this
ABI-breaking change.
Should you agree and wish to make this same change in Debian, you can find
the patch attached.
Regards,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
, or python-dev + python.
Attached is a trivial patch to fix this issue. Note that the python3.5
transition is coming soon to Debian, at which point the severity of this bug
report would be raised to serious.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
versions in
debian/control.
Please see the attached patch for this.
I am filing this bug as Severity: important, because while it does not
currently cause your package to FTBFS, it will eventually become a FTBFS bug
the next time a new version of python3 is added to the distribution.
--
Steve
r as I can see, the only version of libgl2ps0 that was ever in the
archive that had a conflicting filepath was version 1.3.8-2 (bug #824882).
A Breaks/Replaces against this exact version would address any upgrade
problems there, without impacting users of stable releases.
Thanks,
--
Steve La
.
It's simpler to declare a dependency on '@', which translates as 'all the
binary packages produced by this source'; then you don't have to keep it
up to date as your package names change.
Please see the attached patch.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
wherever -O3 is used.
Thanks for considering the patch.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga
has been applied in Ubuntu. Please consider including it
in Debian as well.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:35:10PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi Steve
> On 27 September 2016 at 18:45, Steve Langasek
> <steve.langa...@canonical.com> wrote:
> > The attached patch has been applied in Ubuntu. Please consider including it
> > in Debian as we
ts are considered blockers
for inclusion of a package in the Ubuntu release. Newer versions of
libgpuarray might not be included in Ubuntu releases until this is resolved.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
ild failure in Debian imminently.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.
own.
Hope that helps,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
Control: severity -1 serious
A regression in architecture support is a serious bug by default, and will
block the new version of this package from being published to testing unless
you arrange with the ftpmasters to have the old binaries removed.
--
Steve Langasek Give me
a serious bug once opencv 3.1.0 is uploaded to unstable.
Hope that helps,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org
on two architectures, both of which have luajit available.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga
a timeline for glibc 2.26 in Debian, but when it does arrive
this will of course become a serious bug. You may wish to consider applying
this patch.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 01:38:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> diff -Nru oce-0.17.2/debian/rules oce-0.17.2/debian/rules
> --- oce-0.17.2/debian/rules 2016-06-16 14:02:43.0 -0700
> +++ oce-0.17.2/debian/rules 2017-09-09 12:53:53.0 -0700
> @@ -5,6 +5,9 @
downgrade it in the short term if necessary,
understanding that it will become serious again.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
lear that this is the preferred backend (and possibly drop
python3-pydap from the suggests completely). It's not particularly useful
to have automated testing of the pydap backend if that backend is going to
be perpetually broken.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever lon
,
because there is no signal to say when the test results are good.
If the testing framework supports marking these tests as XFAIL as part of
the autopkgtest, or otherwise skipping them when run on unsuitable hardware,
I think that would be preferable.
Attached is a patch that appears to achieve this here.
Control: tags -1 patch
Control: user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Control: usertags -1 ubuntu-patch
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:37:05PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Ghislain,
>
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 01:16:14PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
>
> > Indeed, wh
fail
when built with this flag, and it is a sensible default in Ubuntu for some
time.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.de
reason they don't all do this is that the fixups are
expensive and it's better to fix the code.
(I am somewhat surprised to see that this particular package build is an
armhf build on an "armel" host; but I'm not sure that's material here.)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
+dfsg1-1ubuntu2/+build/14331366
Attached is the patch has been uploaded to Ubuntu to fix this issue there,
and is one possible solution. (Though you may wish to adjust it to also do
the right thing on non-Linux i386 Debian architectures.)
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
, depending on how serious this
breakage is.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
and arm64 already had
special handling in debian/rules, to build with lower parallelization on
Ubuntu.
I have uploaded the attached patch to Ubuntu to add ppc64el to this list,
and the package now builds.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
25 matches
Mail list logo