Your message dated Thu, 20 Jul 2017 17:18:55 +0000
with message-id <e1dyf6f-0002gy...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#868597: fixed in apertium-is-sv 0.1.0~r76450-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #868597,
regarding apertium-is-sv FTBFS: Error: Position on line 129 near `O Prop + Ant 
+ Fem) ` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
868597: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868597
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apertium-is-sv
Version: 0.1.0~r56030-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid

Some recent change in unstable makes apertium-is-sv FTBFS:

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/apertium-is-sv.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/apertium-is-sv.html

...
cg-comp apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx is-sv.rlx.bin
apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 129 near `O Prop + Ant + Fem) 
` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 130 near `O Prop + Ant + Fem) 
` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 146 near `O A) (O N) (-1C 
VVer` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 148 near `O A) (O N) (1C N) 
(0` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 149 near `O A) (O N) (1C N) 
(0` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 150 near `O A) (O N) (1C N) 
(0` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 151 near `O A) (O N) (1C N) 
(0` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 155 near `O Prop) (1 Prop); 
#I` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
Error: Grammar could not be parsed - exiting!
Makefile:714: recipe for target 'is-sv.rlx.bin' failed
make[1]: *** [is-sv.rlx.bin] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/1st/apertium-is-sv-0.1.0~r56030'
dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2
debian/rules:9: recipe for target 'build' failed
make: *** [build] Error 2

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apertium-is-sv
Source-Version: 0.1.0~r76450-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apertium-is-sv, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 868...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Kartik Mistry <kar...@debian.org> (supplier of updated apertium-is-sv package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:31:06 +0530
Source: apertium-is-sv
Binary: apertium-is-sv
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.0~r76450-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team 
<debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Kartik Mistry <kar...@debian.org>
Description:
 apertium-is-sv - Apertium translation data for the Icelandic-Swedish pair
Closes: 868597
Changes:
 apertium-is-sv (0.1.0~r76450-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Tino Didriksen ]
   * Update to latest upstream release:
     + Fix FTBFS (Closes: #868597)
   * debian/control:
     + Updated to Standards-Version 4.0.0
Checksums-Sha1:
 7525b36354eccce40b6377e94374d3b8a502b09b 2179 apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450-1.dsc
 41856db4a016e42c06614c729aac1831c9da9173 549980 
apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450.orig.tar.bz2
 7b39c3bcf4f8bf994e2240efcc1f4642f2b62061 2052 
apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450-1.debian.tar.xz
 87cf7f840b159ee0c77145a2403e59e286a96fc0 586392 
apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450-1_all.deb
 8683478158b36aa74c08138baaa12d6a8957c98e 6215 
apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 596e3895496b7544659aaa926bb374e1b7e361faeead309eeef44438c0c38248 2179 
apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450-1.dsc
 9d18e237cda16ffaeda53bc0add891db7a019d8a947793e433d2b640a625195b 549980 
apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450.orig.tar.bz2
 6c47ff3075dc2d61b2159a9a732943da625c155e058f31df6b68b0fa0356bf42 2052 
apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450-1.debian.tar.xz
 5ccdc08400d6e81379b6bad7e4d1780fc8b3f71f7a025fb92de58d90644dc6bc 586392 
apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450-1_all.deb
 df0e635d0434f09255c6849b5ca2fabd819d6f4a8972c0ff2406b075ede7082e 6215 
apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 f230101def46c1cc006a3b807e08facf 2179 science optional 
apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450-1.dsc
 6da28eaf0603601b988f4989f0d219bc 549980 science optional 
apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450.orig.tar.bz2
 0f616867b0a5df4c67a27324ca69d02e 2052 science optional 
apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450-1.debian.tar.xz
 258d7cfdc7959b24f285eae05bcb06f9 586392 science optional 
apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450-1_all.deb
 2f0f4b692ae8d2243dc661384a2f72ec 6215 science optional 
apertium-is-sv_0.1.0~r76450-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=LdOW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Reply via email to