Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:06:44 +0200
with message-id 
<cabnmvq7mpsezepnr1cl2u0dpp1jfdt+bqgy_c_r0obc+2n1...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#869582: apertium-eo-es FTBFS
has caused the Debian Bug report #869582,
regarding apertium-eo-es FTBFS: Error: Position on line 159 near `O Vblex + 
Pers) (*1C` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
869582: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=869582
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apertium-eo-es
Version: 1:0.9.1~r60655-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid

Some recent change in unstable makes apertium-eo-es FTBFS:

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/apertium-eo-es.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/apertium-eo-es.html

...
cg-comp apertium-eo-es.es-eo.rlx  es-eo.rlx.bin
apertium-eo-es.es-eo.rlx: Error: Position on line 159 near `O Vblex + Pers) 
(*1C` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-eo-es.es-eo.rlx: Error: Position on line 164 near `O ("como") OR 
("Como` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-eo-es.es-eo.rlx: Error: Position on line 165 near `O ("como") OR 
("Como` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-eo-es.es-eo.rlx: Error: Position on line 166 near `O ("para") OR 
("Para` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-eo-es.es-eo.rlx: Error: Position on line 167 near `O ("para") OR 
("Para` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-eo-es.es-eo.rlx: Error: Position on line 168 near `O ("para") OR 
("Para` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-eo-es.es-eo.rlx: Error: Position on line 169 near `O ("salvo") OR 
("Sal` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-eo-es.es-eo.rlx: Error: Position on line 170 near `O ("salvo") OR 
("Sal` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-eo-es.es-eo.rlx: Error: Position on line 171 near `O ("sobre") OR 
("Sob` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-eo-es.es-eo.rlx: Error: Position on line 172 near `O ("sobre") OR 
("Sob` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0?
apertium-eo-es.es-eo.rlx: Too many errors - giving up...
Makefile:669: recipe for target 'es-eo.rlx.bin' failed
make[1]: *** [es-eo.rlx.bin] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/1st/apertium-eo-es-0.9.1~r60655'
dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2
debian/rules:9: recipe for target 'build' failed
make: *** [build] Error 2

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apertium-eo-es
Version: 1:0.9.1~r60655-2

This was closed in latest upload, patched before this bug was opened.
Managed to cross paths.

-- Tino Didriksen

--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Reply via email to