Layne,
Do you call this being mad?
You come across like an idiot.
The only e-mail address you could have sent a mail to, you did not.
It is the list administrator that I blame for this kind of mails gracing my screen.
As for you, you are forgiven.
Layne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said thusly on
Pedro Zorzenon Neto,
Why do you assume he's got parents. He comes across as an orphan.
Pedro Zorzenon Neto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said thusly on [01/09/01 at 15:01]:
I also blame him for not complaining politely at his first reply to the list.
He just started complaining with words I won't
Hi,
I wonder whether a sendmail security patch (input validation
error, BUGTRAQ ID: 3163) will be available soon?
It is reported that a working exploit is available on the net.
So I consider to get an updated version from sendmail.org, if
a debian package will not be available in the near
hello,
this is a work i would like to study but i fall in problem when looking for
Linux Socket Filtering Documentation.
I want to make a filter that can alterate data on tcp packets following
some rules ( e.g. faking icq messages to give you an idea ) and must block
the original packet (or
Because of loads of resonses to me willing to send the script I've put
it on the web for now, it's at:
http://www.insecure.nl/~vdong/
Greetz,
Ivo
Without the darkness, how would you recognize the light?
Quoting cdpye ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I have noticed recently that attempted connections to my box aren't being
logged in syslog.
It's possible that RH installed a deamon like 'tcplogd' and 'icmplogd'
by default or you just enabled that option. These deamons show incomming
connection attempts
Greetings,
Anyone had success compiling snort 1.81 on a stable potato box?
Looking at the snort website, there is a question regarding libpcap
0.5 under Redhat that will cause problems, does anyone know if this is
this redhat specific? Potato only offers libpcap0 0.4a6-3.
I dont have to have
Hi,
I'm currently running Portsentry on a box, and I've got it configured to add an
ipchains rule firewalling off all access to an IP that touches one of the ports
that Portsentry is listening on (after doing some sanity checks on where the
portscan/port access came from).
I find the way that
Compiled and ran fine for me with libpcap 0.4a6.
--sjk
On 4 Sep, Shane Machon wrote:
Greetings,
Anyone had success compiling snort 1.81 on a stable potato box?
Looking at the snort website, there is a question regarding libpcap
0.5 under Redhat that will cause problems, does anyone
Hello!
Did you hear about netfilter/iptables/ipchains etc?
This is a firewall task, isn't it?
And there are tons of documentation - visit netfilter.samba.org.
Or google :).
-Original Message-
From: Samu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 9:04 PM
To: [EMAIL
Hello,
--- Shane Machon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont have to have 1.81 of snort (would be nice
though!), just db
support (1.7 or above)
Any success stories?
I used compiled from sources snort for 2 month. Then,
I decide to add db support and try to recompile it.
But it depends on so
bwuahahahahahaahhahahahahahhaahhahahahaahahhahahahahahaahahhahahahahahahahahaaa
know how many copies of that i have on ptd account
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Layne,
Do you call this being mad?
You come across like an idiot.
The only e-mail address you could have sent a mail to, you did not.
It is the list administrator that I blame for this kind of mails gracing my
screen.
As for you, you are forgiven.
Layne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said thusly on
Pedro Zorzenon Neto,
Why do you assume he's got parents. He comes across as an orphan.
Pedro Zorzenon Neto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said thusly on [01/09/01 at 15:01]:
I also blame him for not complaining politely at his first reply to the list.
He just started complaining with words I won't
Hi,
I wonder whether a sendmail security patch (input validation
error, BUGTRAQ ID: 3163) will be available soon?
It is reported that a working exploit is available on the net.
So I consider to get an updated version from sendmail.org, if
a debian package will not be available in the near
slightly off topic ... but identd is pretty insecure ...
directly copied from the nmap man page
As noted
by Dave Goldsmith in a 1996 Bugtraq post, the ident
protocol (rfc 1413) allows for the disclosure of
the username that owns
hello,
this is a work i would like to study but i fall in problem when looking for
Linux Socket Filtering Documentation.
I want to make a filter that can alterate data on tcp packets following
some rules ( e.g. faking icq messages to give you an idea ) and must block
the original packet (or
Because of loads of resonses to me willing to send the script I've put
it on the web for now, it's at:
http://www.insecure.nl/~vdong/
Greetz,
Ivo
Without the darkness, how would you recognize the light?
Quoting cdpye ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I have noticed recently that attempted connections to my box aren't being
logged in syslog.
It's possible that RH installed a deamon like 'tcplogd' and 'icmplogd'
by default or you just enabled that option. These deamons show incomming
connection attempts and
Greetings,
Anyone had success compiling snort 1.81 on a stable potato box?
Looking at the snort website, there is a question regarding libpcap
0.5 under Redhat that will cause problems, does anyone know if this is
this redhat specific? Potato only offers libpcap0 0.4a6-3.
I dont have to have
Hi,
I'm currently running Portsentry on a box, and I've got it configured to add an
ipchains rule firewalling off all access to an IP that touches one of the ports
that Portsentry is listening on (after doing some sanity checks on where the
portscan/port access came from).
I find the way that
I'm interested in doing CODA file system over the internet. It has
all the features of a networked filesystem that I'm interested in.
The only problem seems to be that it requires the use of the
portmapper. From my NFS day, I seem to remember that portmapper is
insecure. Is this true? Is CODA
Hello,
I am using pure-ftpd 0.99.1b (compiled from source) on a potato-system
with kernel 2.4.9.
I want to make one ftp-account accessible only for certain
IP-addresses. This is possible by using pam_access and it works fine
with ssh. I added this line to /etc/pam.d/pure-ftpd:
account required
Compiled and ran fine for me with libpcap 0.4a6.
--sjk
On 4 Sep, Shane Machon wrote:
Greetings,
Anyone had success compiling snort 1.81 on a stable potato box?
Looking at the snort website, there is a question regarding libpcap
0.5 under Redhat that will cause problems, does anyone
Hello!
Did you hear about netfilter/iptables/ipchains etc?
This is a firewall task, isn't it?
And there are tons of documentation - visit netfilter.samba.org.
Or google :).
-Original Message-
From: Samu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 9:04 PM
To:
Hello,
--- Shane Machon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont have to have 1.81 of snort (would be nice
though!), just db
support (1.7 or above)
Any success stories?
I used compiled from sources snort for 2 month. Then,
I decide to add db support and try to recompile it.
But it depends on so
26 matches
Mail list logo
