ClamAV is supported in Debian and it's very well integrated with
amavisd-new (which, in turn, can be used also with spamassassin).
Yes, but where can I find clamav for woody?
Sid's package depends on whole lot of sid stuff, so recompiling it on woody
requires significant effort. Data from
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 at 08:43:46 +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
ClamAV is supported in Debian and it's very well integrated with
amavisd-new (which, in turn, can be used also with spamassassin).
Yes, but where can I find clamav for woody?
Sid's package depends on whole lot of sid stuff, so
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
And... a mail with a positive virus recognition can be deleted without having
to fear it's a false positive,
umm... what makes you think so?
Besides the typical case, that one wants to send a virus file (there are
researches out there, you know) the
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 at 1:54:42 +0200, Thomas Ritter wrote:
Just a note: Open Antivirus programs like clamav are not perfect, because the
open virus database [1] is still too small... but for _sorting_ mail, clamav
(it's in sid) is really good. It gives you
[...]
[1]
Don't underestimate clamav. Sure it does not have 75,000 virii in it's
database, but it catches well over 98% of the viruses that cross my little
ISP. (I run both NOD32 and ClamAV with MailScanner so I see all the ones
that NOD gets and ClamAV does not, which is _very_ few). Plus the ClamAV
Am Mittwoch, 24. September 2003 02:14 schrieb Bernd Eckenfels:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
And... a mail with a positive virus recognition can be deleted without
having to fear it's a false positive,
umm... what makes you think so?
Okay, it's not absolutely safe, but for home
ClamAV is supported in Debian and it's very well integrated with
amavisd-new (which, in turn, can be used also with spamassassin).
Yes, but where can I find clamav for woody?
Sid's package depends on whole lot of sid stuff, so recompiling it on woody
requires significant effort. Data from
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
And... a mail with a positive virus recognition can be deleted without having
to fear it's a false positive,
umm... what makes you think so?
Besides the typical case, that one wants to send a virus file (there are
researches out there, you know) the
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 at 1:54:42 +0200, Thomas Ritter wrote:
Just a note: Open Antivirus programs like clamav are not perfect, because the
open virus database [1] is still too small... but for _sorting_ mail, clamav
(it's in sid) is really good. It gives you
[...]
[1]
Don't underestimate clamav. Sure it does not have 75,000 virii in it's
database, but it catches well over 98% of the viruses that cross my little
ISP. (I run both NOD32 and ClamAV with MailScanner so I see all the ones
that NOD gets and ClamAV does not, which is _very_ few). Plus the ClamAV
Am Mittwoch, 24. September 2003 02:14 schrieb Bernd Eckenfels:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
And... a mail with a positive virus recognition can be deleted without
having to fear it's a false positive,
umm... what makes you think so?
Okay, it's not absolutely safe, but for home
Am Mittwoch, 24. September 2003 02:34 schrieb Tomasz Papszun:
Sorry but I must say that this is an incorrect claim.
okay, not exclusively
Currently ClamAV's own database is quite big and is updated even a
couple of times a day if needed. It's quite good at new viruses caught
in the wild,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 03:23:35PM +0200, Thomas Ritter wrote:
Yes, I don't know the name, but there's a reference standard virus list.
I think you're talking about the Wildlist (www.wildlist.org). That's
not a reference list, but simply a list of viruses reported as
currently active by at
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:54:42AM +0200, Thomas Ritter wrote:
And... a mail with a positive virus recognition can be deleted without having
to fear it's a false positive, against which a mail found to be Spam by
Spamassassin may be a real mail.
This is not true.
There's always the
[ I'm resending it because yesterday try didn't appear on the list.
Thomas Ritter has already answered to the copy which I sent directly to
him. ]
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 at 1:54:42 +0200, Thomas Ritter wrote:
Just a note: Open Antivirus programs like clamav are not perfect, because the
open
Am Mittwoch, 24. September 2003 02:34 schrieb Tomasz Papszun:
Sorry but I must say that this is an incorrect claim.
okay, not exclusively
Currently ClamAV's own database is quite big and is updated even a
couple of times a day if needed. It's quite good at new viruses caught
in the wild,
Am Dienstag, 23. September 2003 23:48 schrieb Joel HATSCH:
of these fake Microsoft Update emails per day.
The single part MIME filter doesn't seem to catch it though. What
Just a note: Open Antivirus programs like clamav are not perfect, because the
open virus database [1] is still too
Am Dienstag, 23. September 2003 23:48 schrieb Joel HATSCH:
of these fake Microsoft Update emails per day.
The single part MIME filter doesn't seem to catch it though. What
Just a note: Open Antivirus programs like clamav are not perfect, because the
open virus database [1] is still too
18 matches
Mail list logo
