Re: Setting APT::Default-Release prevents installation of security updates in bookworm!?

2023-08-18 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, Daniel Gröber wrote: > One mention I found is in Raphaël and Roland's DAH (now in CC): > https://debian-handbook.info/browse/stable/sect.apt-get.html#sect.apt-upgrade I also saw your associated bug report. Thanks for highlighting this issue to me. I updated

Re: Setting APT::Default-Release prevents installation of security updates in bookworm!?

2023-07-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2023-07-22 at 17:45 +0200, Hannes von Haugwitz wrote: > What about to add a warning to apt if *-security or *-updates is > configured in the sources list and `APT::Default-Release` is set but > does not match the security or updates repo? That seems like the right solution here, please

Re: Setting APT::Default-Release prevents installation of security updates in bookworm!?

2023-07-22 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 03:56:02PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > You will have to ask the apt developers and archive admins about this, > but at the end of the day reverting it is unlikely to happen, so > probably it is something everyone will just have to learn to live with. What about to add a

Re: Setting APT::Default-Release prevents installation of security updates in bookworm!?

2023-07-22 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi Paul, On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 03:56:02PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > One mention I found is in Raphaël and Roland's DAH (now in CC): > > https://debian-handbook.info/browse/stable/sect.apt-get.html#sect.apt-upgrade > > Probably better to file a bug about this, so it is tracked. Ah, I didn't

Re: Setting APT::Default-Release prevents installation of security updates in bookworm!?

2023-07-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2023-07-21 at 11:04 +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote: > Do you have any references on how this decision came to be? I think it was about making the suite naming more intuitive, consistent with other suites and possibly also some dak implementation concerns. > One mention I found is in Raphaël

Re: Setting APT::Default-Release prevents installation of security updates in bookworm!?

2023-07-21 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi Paul, On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:17:28AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, 2023-07-20 at 22:12 +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote: > > > It seems packages from the debian-security repository are not affected by > > this increased priority and will not get intalled as a result. > > This was

Re: Setting APT::Default-Release prevents installation of security updates in bookworm!?

2023-07-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2023-07-20 at 22:12 +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote: > It seems packages from the debian-security repository are not affected by > this increased priority and will not get intalled as a result. This was documented in the release notes for Debian bullseye:

Setting APT::Default-Release prevents installation of security updates in bookworm!?

2023-07-20 Thread Daniel Gröber
Hi debian-security, I've just noticed something rather distressing. As part of my usual Debian installation I set `APT::Default-Release "stable";` which causes a change of apt priorities for packages from this release (or so I thought) from the usual 500 to 990. This is recommended in various