On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:07:18 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Freitag, 3. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There
is no option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie
where you can see the problematic combo box and
On Friday 03 September 2010 18:47:20 Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:22:52 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Freitag, 3. September 2010 schrieb Lisi:
No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is
no option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 22:06:33 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010, Celejar wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:32:03 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:
...
That said, I don't trust hybernation. Your data is much safer in the
On Thursday 02 September 2010 21:11:33 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:40:56 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
I meant you can hibernate your computer with any amount of
Am Freitag, 3. September 2010 schrieb Lisi:
No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is no
option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie where you can
see the problematic combo box and the hibernation (Tiefschlaf) button
right underneath.
I'm still
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:22:52 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Freitag, 3. September 2010 schrieb Lisi:
No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is
no option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie where you
can see the problematic combo box and the
Am Freitag, 3. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is
no option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie where you
can see the problematic combo box and the hibernation (Tiefschlaf)
button right underneath.
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010, Celejar wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:32:03 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:
...
That said, I don't trust hybernation. Your data is much safer in the
long run if you restrain yourself to suspend-to-RAM and shutdowns.
Can you elaborate on
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 03:11:27 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
because I can’t make Powerdevil (KDE’s power management utility) hide
the Hibernate button (which I hit accidentially from time to time),
I’d like to disable the suspend to disk feature on my system. It’s not
practical anyway (it’s
On Jo, 02 sep 10, 07:39:09, Camaleón wrote:
Amount of ram should not be a relevant key value for benefiting of
hibernation.
Unless there's something I'm missing, copying the contents of the RAM to
HDD and back heavily depends on the total data available in RAM, which
tends to be higher
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:03:33 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Jo, 02 sep 10, 07:39:09, Camaleón wrote:
Amount of ram should not be a relevant key value for benefiting of
hibernation.
Unless there's something I'm missing, copying the contents of the RAM to
HDD and back heavily depends on
Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
I meant you can hibernate your computer with any amount of ram available,
there are still restoring speed gains in some computers. Your mileage may
vary.
But you also need as much space on the HDD to store the RAM content, which I
don’t
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:40:56 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
I meant you can hibernate your computer with any amount of ram
available, there are still restoring speed gains in some computers.
Your mileage may vary.
But you also need as
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Jo, 02 sep 10, 07:39:09, Camaleón wrote:
Amount of ram should not be a relevant key value for benefiting of
hibernation.
Unless there's something I'm missing, copying the contents of the RAM to
HDD and back heavily depends on the total data
Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:40:56 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
I meant you can hibernate your computer with any amount of ram
available, there are still restoring speed gains in some
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:11:33 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
(...)
Booting to the login screeen takes ~35–40 seconds here. Plus another
half minute to load the DE. Usually I am using normal standby (aka
suspend to RAM). Powerdevil has
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:32:03 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:
...
That said, I don't trust hybernation. Your data is much safer in the
long run if you restrain yourself to suspend-to-RAM and shutdowns.
Can you elaborate on this? I have certainly experienced my share
Hello List,
because I can’t make Powerdevil (KDE’s power management utility) hide the
Hibernate button (which I hit accidentially from time to time), I’d like to
disable the suspend to disk feature on my system. It’s not practical anyway
(it’s a laptop with 3 GB of RAM).
So what is the proper
18 matches
Mail list logo
