On 2/06/22 05:26, Joe wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2022 03:17:52 +0100
mick crane wrote:
regarding firewall discussion I'm uncertain how firewalls are
supposed to work.
I think the idea is that nothing is accepted unless it is in response
to a request.
What's to stop some spurious instructions being
On 2022-06-01 18:26, Joe wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2022 03:17:52 +0100
mick crane wrote:
regarding firewall discussion I'm uncertain how firewalls are
supposed to work.
I think the idea is that nothing is accepted unless it is in response
to a request.
What's to stop some spurious instructions
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 15:02:10 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > mick crane wrote:
> > > regarding firewall discussion I'm uncertain how firewalls are
> > > supposed to work.
> > > I think the idea is that nothing is accepted unless it is in
> > > r
> mick crane wrote:
> > regarding firewall discussion I'm uncertain how firewalls are
> > supposed to work.
> > I think the idea is that nothing is accepted unless it is in response
> > to a request.
> > What's to stop some spurious instructions being sent i
On Tue, 31 May 2022 03:17:52 +0100
mick crane wrote:
> regarding firewall discussion I'm uncertain how firewalls are
> supposed to work.
> I think the idea is that nothing is accepted unless it is in response
> to a request.
> What's to stop some spurious instructions being s
On 2022-05-31 12:21, IL Ka wrote:
What's to stop some spurious instructions being sent in response to
genuine request?
Packets do not contain instructions, only data. If your TCP/IP
implementation doesn't have vulnerabilities any packet shouldn't be a
problem.
Firewall prevents technically
>
>
> I think the idea is that nothing is accepted
it depends on policy (-P): either ACCEPT, REJECT or DROP
> unless it is in response to
> a request.
>
You must enable it explicitly, i.e.
-A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
> What's to stop some spurious instructions
On 31/5/22 10:17 am, mick crane wrote:
regarding firewall discussion I'm uncertain how firewalls are supposed
to work.
I think the idea is that nothing is accepted unless it is in response
to a request.
What's to stop some spurious instructions being sent in response to
genuine request
mick crane wrote:
> regarding firewall discussion I'm uncertain how firewalls
> are supposed to work. I think the idea is that nothing is
> accepted unless it is in response to a request. What's to
> stop some spurious instructions being sent in response to
> genuine request?
Fir
regarding firewall discussion I'm uncertain how firewalls are supposed
to work.
I think the idea is that nothing is accepted unless it is in response to
a request.
What's to stop some spurious instructions being sent in response to
genuine request?
regards
mick
10 matches
Mail list logo
