On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:30:20AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Also very nice is the output of
$ ls -l /bin/sh
for Ubuntu it's not bash.
For modern Debian installations it's not bash either. Switching /bin/sh
to dash by default was done principally to make boot times quicker (dash
is
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 12:02 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:30:20AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Also very nice is the output of
$ ls -l /bin/sh
for Ubuntu it's not bash.
For modern Debian installations it's not bash either. Switching /bin/sh
to dash by default
Le Mar 27 novembre 2012 14:29, Ralf Mardorf a écrit :
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 12:02 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:30:20AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Also very nice is the output of
$ ls -l /bin/sh
for Ubuntu it's not bash.
For modern Debian installations it's not
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:29:15PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Does it really carry weight?
With sysvinit, which spawns a lot of sh instances, yes. With something like
systemd, no - it tries to solve the same problem in part by not spawning a
shell lots of times.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tuesday 27 November 2012 12:02:34 Jon Dowland wrote:
For modern Debian installations it's not bash either. Switching /bin/sh
to dash by default was done principally to make boot times quicker (dash
is smaller and faster to load than bash).
Thanks for the information, Jon. I hadn't realised
Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com writes:
On Tuesday 27 November 2012 12:02:34 Jon Dowland wrote:
For modern Debian installations it's not bash either. Switching /bin/sh
to dash by default was done principally to make boot times quicker (dash
is smaller and faster to load than bash).
Thanks
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 03:11:54PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Thanks for the information, Jon. I hadn't realised that! I've merrily
carried on using bash. :-/
Bash is a lot friendlier and better suited as a login or interactive
shell. The startup time is not so important for that situation.
7 matches
Mail list logo
