Le dimanche, 19 janvier 2014, 12.39:01 Ian Jackson a écrit :
Russ Allbery writes (Re: GR: Selecting the default init system for
Debian):
As a TC member, I dislike the supermajority requirement for the
project to overturn a TC decision by GR, particularly in this case.
I think we would all
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 03:56:29PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
I don't think our constitution allows a resolution of the TC to change
how §4.1.4 has to be interpreted for a GR overriding it[0]. It would
certainly need to be checked with the secretary (CC'ed, just in case).
That
Neil McGovern writes (Re: GR: Selecting the default init system for Debian):
That would certainly seem to be the case, but it would be illogical for
a group who is happy to be overridden with a lower requirement to be
prevented from doing so!
Quite.
I think it's perfectly possible for a TC
Neil McGovern writes (Re: GR: Selecting the default init system for Debian):
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:11:17PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Ian - any thoughts on if your tech-ctte constitution GR could address
this?
You mean my TC resolution draft.
Nope, I meant your supermajorty etc
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org writes:
Le dimanche, 19 janvier 2014, 12.39:01 Ian Jackson a écrit :
I agree. I think that would be quite bad. We could explicitly state
in our TC resolution that the TC decision can be vacated by General
Resolution on a simple majority.
I don't think
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:21:41AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org writes:
Le dimanche, 19 janvier 2014, 12.39:01 Ian Jackson a écrit :
I agree. I think that would be quite bad. We could explicitly state
in our TC resolution that the TC decision can be
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:11:17PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Ian - any thoughts on if your tech-ctte constitution GR could address
this?
You mean my TC resolution draft.
Nope, I meant your supermajorty etc draft.
Snipping the rest, as that seems to be something for tech-ctte, rather
than
[ M-F-T and Reply-To set to debian-vote@l.d.o. ]
Hi!
This is the revised draft GR proposal (please see below); I'm looking
for sponsors now.
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 01:01:44 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
I think that forcing a decision through the TC at this time was very
premature and
I'd like to raise the objection that the TC hasn't done their job yet,
and while the TC has done a great job of getting *true* technically
grounded facts out yet, we've not let the process work.
Let the TC do their work. They're coming up on a vote, and they may even
suggest a GR.
This GR is
Hi,
Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org writes:
,--- DRAFT GR TEXT ---
A General Resolution to select the default init system for Debian.
Option A
[...]
Option H
If people want to have a GR on the init system, could we please not
entangle two issues in a single vote:
1. Default init system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 01/27/2014 08:39 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
This is the revised draft GR proposal (please see below); I'm looking for
sponsors now.
please stop wasting people's time and let the TC do their work instead.
Thanks.
- --
Bernd Zeimetz
Very much NOT seconded.
I have way more interesting things to do than becoming an init system
expert; and I would have to become one to be able to vote honestly in
this GR.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Le Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:39:52PM +0100, Guillem Jover a écrit :
This is the revised draft GR proposal (please see below); I'm looking
for sponsors now.
Hi Guillem,
if the result of the current TC vote is « further discussion », then I will
second your GR. In the meantime, it is probably
13 matches
Mail list logo
