On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 03:18:25PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
That's a nice step. Now we just need someone to maintain the consolekit
codepaths in all the desktop environments, in policykit and in other
users.
It's being maintained by XFCE until the systemd API's are good enough in
Hi.
This seems to have stalled and I'm disappointed to see that because I
think this is an important issue.
My recommendation is that you propose a resolution based on the comments
you received.
If a resolution isn't proposed within a week or so and there isn't some
nontrivial ongoing
Hi Sam,
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 07:00:46PM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
This seems to have stalled and I'm disappointed to see that because I
think this is an important issue.
My recommendation is that you propose a resolution based on the comments
you received.
nontrivial ongoing
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 06:58:10AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
On 28 October 2014 12:12, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:30:50AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
Has anyone actually tested the viability of running systemd in
On 2014-11-03, Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org wrote:
I'm really kind of frustrated and disappointed reading your message, and
I expect it's just a side effect of some wording choice here.
It sounds like what you're saying is that the TC has decided to defer
the discussions of TC term limits,
I apologize for the lateness of this posting. I was under the impression that
the announcement page (https://www.debian.org/vote/2014/vote_003) would be
updated to reflect when the discussion period had commenced.
There has been a bit of talk during this discussion about Debian being a
Sune == Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk writes:
Sune I read the logs from the tech-ctte meeting, and my impression
Sune was that - people in tech-ctte thinks that maximum terms are a
Sune good idea - that they should push the thing forward (if no one
Sune else does) - but they
Hi.
thanks for your input.
For myself, I definitely appreciate the contributions of all the parties
you mentioned, and appreciate your reminder that Debian is a very large
community.
One important category you didn't mention is all our wonderful upstreams
who have given us this great software to
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 19:41:16 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi Sam,
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 07:00:46PM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
This seems to have stalled and I'm disappointed to see that because I
think this is an important issue.
My recommendation is that you propose a resolution
Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org writes:
This was discussed at the last tech-ctte irc meeting, and it was agreed
to defer this until the current GR has quietened down. See
http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-ctte/2014/debian-ctte.2014-10-30-17.00.log.html
I think we were only deferring pushing it
Gerrit Pape p...@dbnbgs.smarden.org writes:
What is the reason that one can't easily run logind, or even better a
systemd process running logind and possibly other services, under the
runsv program from the runit init scheme, or through /etc/inittab?
I believe it's that logind relies on the
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014, Sam Hartman wrote:
A TC meeting is a meeting where only the TC members are speaking.
That's not really the right forum for such a decision to be taken.
Just to echo Russ's comments, all that we really discussed was that as
the CTTE, we weren't going to press forward for
Russ Allbery wrote:
Gerrit Pape p...@dbnbgs.smarden.org writes:
What is the reason that one can't easily run logind, or even better a
systemd process running logind and possibly other services, under the
runsv program from the runit init scheme, or through /etc/inittab?
I believe it's
I agree with the proposal.
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
Distribution packages have been almost all converted to systemd
services, with a handful of less-used-packages remaining [1].
Jóhann B Guðmundsson, the erstwhile feature owner for Fedora's System 5
rc to systemd units conversion project, states that the
Don == Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:
Personally, I agree that having multiple active discussion/second
periods on debian-vote is problematic.
Don Right; that's what we seemed to agree on as well.
Don I think that we can all agree that we'd like a decision on this
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 01:38:24AM +, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
Distribution packages have been almost all converted to systemd
services, with a handful of less-used-packages remaining [1].
Jóhann B Guðmundsson, the erstwhile feature owner for
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org wrote:
Don == Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:
Personally, I agree that having multiple active discussion/second
periods on debian-vote is problematic.
Don Right; that's what we seemed to agree on as well.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Saul Goode wrote:
I imagine I've missed other contributors, but the point is that for each of
the 1084 Debian Developers who are being asked to vote in this GR, there are
dozens, if not hundreds, of contributors who are deserving not only of
recognition for
19 matches
Mail list logo
