Re: REISSUED CfV: General Resolution: Init system coupling

2014-11-05 Thread Philip Hands
Hi Neil, Philip Hands p...@hands.com writes: - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e ... Oh, oops! maybe you should set the Reply-To for bears of little brain like me. I'm sure you probably do so normally, and that

Re: REISSUED CfV: General Resolution: Init system coupling

2014-11-05 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Philip Hands: - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- That CfV should have had a Reply-To: line … -- -- Matthias Urlichs signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members

2014-11-05 Thread Sam Hartman
Andreas == Andreas Henriksson andr...@fatal.se writes: Andreas Hello Anthony Towns! Andreas On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 03:10:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: Andreas [...] I haven't been particularly active in Debian over the past few years, and my feeling is that it's better

Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members

2014-11-05 Thread Matthew Vernon
Brian Gupta bgu...@debian.org writes: On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org wrote: Don == Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes: I'd find arguments of the form I personally would find it confusing/bad to have both going on because ... more compelling than

Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members

2014-11-05 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello Anthony Towns! On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 03:10:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: [...] I haven't been particularly active in Debian over the past few years, and my feeling is that it's better to leave proposing resolutions (particularly constitutional changes!) to people who have been. So,

Re: REISSUED CfV: General Resolution: Init system coupling

2014-11-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 08:54:17AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: Hi Neil, (CC'ing secretary@) Le mardi, 4 novembre 2014, 23.53:43 Neil McGovern a écrit : The responses to a valid vote shall be signed by the vote key created for this vote. The public key for the vote, signed by the

Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members

2014-11-05 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:43:38PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: The sooner the better IMHO. I find it very weird that tech-ctte members apparently recognize the need but still want to be force-rotated rather then voluntarily doing it. On the other hand, I guess you don't end up in a

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

2014-11-05 Thread Marco d'Itri
goli...@riseup.net wrote: I came to Linux for FREEDOM and for configurability. Finally, I could http://islinuxaboutchoice.com/ Thank you for your contribute. Next! -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

2014-11-05 Thread tor...@riseup.net
m...@linux.it wrote: goli...@riseup.net wrote: I came to Linux for FREEDOM and for configurability. Finally, I could http://islinuxaboutchoice.com/ Thank you for your contribute. Next! It might be your opinion that GNU/Linux is not about choice, but it is often said and the reason why

Re: How about always sending a copy of proposals, amendements, secondes etc. to the Secretary ?

2014-11-05 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 06:45:55PM -0800, Don Armstrong a écrit : Those of us who propose amendments and proposals should really propose a ballot option name, amendment, and figure out who seconded the proposals and just send them to the secretary in wml suitable for direct inclusion in the