Re: Q: NEW process licence requirements

Le dimanche, 1 avril 2018, 00.11:58 h CEST Adrian Bunk a écrit : > Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 11:03:00PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > Like it or not, but there *is* a big difference in the project making > > something available for the big wide world (which a public NEW would > > be), or a user

Re: Q: NEW process licence requirements

On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 6:11 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > What is the big (legal) difference between distributing something > from the Debian group on the Debian machine salsa.debian.org, and > distributing the same from a different Debian machine? The big difference appears to be the Social Contract

Vote status

The vote is running, you can send the emails. You will not get a ack about your vote until I can look at what's broken, which will hopefully be tomorrow evening. If you received an error message, I can reprocess your email. There is no reason to revote at the moment. If you did vote properly you

Debian Project Leader election 2018: First call for votes

Hi, This is the first call for votes on the DPL election of 2018. Voting period starts 2018-04-03 00:00:00 UTC Votes must be received by 2018-04-16 23:59:59 UTC This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution. You may see the constitution at

Ballot for the vote

Here is the ballot for the vote. Voting period starts 2018-04-03 00:00:00 UTC Votes must be received by 2018-04-16 23:59:59 UTC This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution. You may see the constitution at https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution. For

Re: Question: What would you like to see {more,less} of?

Dear Bdale, > I've been startled sometimes at how other read what I wrote instead of > what I meant, and how often a very small tweak in wording was all it > took to clear up the distinction... Thank you for sharing your wisdom :) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `.

Re: Question: What would you like to see {more,less} of?

Chris Lamb writes: > Every time I tried drafting such "loaded" opinions in the past I could > already hear the (perhaps justified…) pushback and thus decided not to > get closer involved. I think it depends a lot on how local vs general the topic is. For example, in my second

Re: Q: NEW process licence requirements

On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 10:57:24AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: >... > The other, critical, factor nobody has raised is time. Why not > assume good faith here? After all, which is more likely - the FTP > team are sitting around doing nothing and happy/enjoying the current > state of affairs, or too

Re: Q: NEW process licence requirements

On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 04:11:40PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 10:36:23PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > If someone does go down the road, then any project creation on salsa > > would possibly end up needing to be vetted by an admin (or a new team > > doing this, or a

Re: Q: NEW process licence requirements

On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 10:36:23PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 14994 March 1977, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Since Debian distributing whatever random people upload to salsa > > is fine for you, I fail to see the point why you would consider > > distributing what is in the DD-only NEW a huge

Re: Question: What would you like to see {more,less} of?

Hi Martin, > > Every time I tried drafting such "loaded" opinions in the past > > I could already hear the (perhaps justified…) pushback and thus > > decided not to get closer involved. > > Don't you think being a leader sometimes requires to withstand some > pushback Of course, but not if one

Re: Question: What would you like to see {more,less} of?

Hi Martin, > > Every time I tried drafting such "loaded" opinions in the past > > I could already hear the (perhaps justified…) pushback and thus > > decided not to get closer involved. > > Don't you think being a leader sometimes requires to withstand some > pushback Of course, but not if one

Re: Question: What would you like to see {more,less} of?

also sprach Chris Lamb [2018-04-02 21:41 +1200]: > Every time I tried drafting such "loaded" opinions in the past > I could already hear the (perhaps justified…) pushback and thus > decided not to get closer involved. Don't you think being a leader sometimes requires to

Re: Q: NEW process licence requirements

Hi Adrian, > > do we really want to a culture in Debian where it is acceptable to > > publically belittle others' efforts using such emotionally loaded > > words or in such a combatitive / adversarial manner? > > you omitted the relevant part from my email I'm sorry you feel misquoted but I

Re: Question: What would you like to see {more,less} of?

Dear Enrico, > I wouldn't want the DPL to express their opinion with the expectation > that everyone should agree or follow their lead, but more with the idea > of giving a sense of direction Nod. There are a few situations where I would like to have liked to done this during my first term.