Joerg Jaspert writes:
> I hereby nominate myself for the DPL election 2019.
Jonathan Carter writes:
> I hereby nominate myself for the 2019 DPL election.
Whether our constitution requires a second or not, I'm grateful to people
putting themselves up for the DPL role.
So, I hereby second the
On 2019-03-14 00:05:16, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Disclaimer: I was the DPL between 2013 and 2015. My recollection of that
> time might not be entirely correct, and Debian might have changed quite
> a bit since then. I must admit that I haven't followed Debian closely
> enough to know some
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 09:38:52AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> I nominate myself to stand as a candidate for DPL in the 2019 DPL
> elections.
I ack that this is valid.
Kurt
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:34:02PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> I hereby nominate myself for the DPL election 2019.
I ack that this is valid.
Kurt
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 01:43:04PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> I hereby nominate myself for the 2019 DPL election.
I ack that this is valid.
Kurt
My understanding is that there's not a lot of campaigning in the
nominations period.
I'd feel more comfortable answering the questions you ask below next
week.
I hope my platform will answer your question about what I plan to focus
on, and I'd be happy to talk about my impressions of how much
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 09:38:52AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I've been pondering this over the last week and dealing with things like
> getting authorization from my employer.
Can you share more details on your availability? I.e., how many hours a
week does your employer allow you to spend on
I nominate myself to stand as a candidate for DPL in the 2019 DPL
elections.
I've been pondering this over the last week and dealing with things like
getting authorization from my employer.
I've been struggling to find the right place to help Debian work better
together and to help people solve
Hi
On 3/14/19 8:43 AM, Jonathan Carter wrote:
>
> On 2019/03/14 13:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> Soo, lets ensure we do not have another week:
>>
>> I hereby nominate myself for the DPL election 2019.
>
> I hereby nominate myself for the 2019 DPL election.
Thanks you both!!
Regards!
--
Daniel
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 01:43:04PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 2019/03/14 13:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > I hereby nominate myself for the DPL election 2019.
>
> I hereby nominate myself for the 2019 DPL election.
Mwahahaha, so we managed to guilt-trip you two into stepping forward, so
On 14/03/19 at 16:00 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:24:58AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > So, thinking a bit more about that, and using
> > https://www.debian.org/intro/organization.en.html as a basis, a split
> > that could maybe work is:
> Can it work without a
On 2019/03/14 13:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Soo, lets ensure we do not have another week:
>
> I hereby nominate myself for the DPL election 2019.
I have been considering that too, and have been planning to submit my
self-nomination as late as possible to give me enough chance to chicken out.
On 15337 March 1977, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
Since there were no candidates during the nomination period, the
nomination period has been extended by 1 week.
Soo, lets ensure we do not have another week:
I hereby nominate myself for the DPL election 2019.
--
bye, Joerg
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes:
>
> > - it's a position where you are often alone, and lack feedback
>
> This is true in the limit, but I, and a number of other former DPLs,
> have often made ourselves available to the acting DPL to act as a
> "sounding board".
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:24:58AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> So, thinking a bit more about that, and using
> https://www.debian.org/intro/organization.en.html as a basis, a split
> that could maybe work is:
Can it work without a GR?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 09:36 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> The second one (which requires more work on the Debian side) is to do
> our own double-accounting, track all expenses, and track how they are
> taken into account by TOs.
As far as I have seen Debian expenses, the Debian treasurers are
Hello,
Missatge de Martin Michlmayr del dia dj., 14 de març
2019 a les 5:26:
> * Lucas Nussbaum [2019-03-14 00:05]:
> > Also, from the DPL POV, it would be very useful to have an annual
> > report on Debian finances. I don't know if this exists nowadays.
> It doesn't. I wanted to do
On 14/03/19 at 00:05 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> What could work is a group of people that are elected together, agree
> beforehand on how to share the various areas of responsibility, and
> synchronize very frequently to align their views. But it's probably hard
> to be efficient in the
On 14/03/19 at 00:01 -0700, Jose Miguel Parrella wrote:
> lucas wrote:
> > What could work is a group of people that are elected together, agree
> > beforehand on how to share the various areas of responsibility, and
> > synchronize very frequently to align their views. But it's probably hard
> >
On 13/03/19 at 21:04 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> How much of the DPL's financial role can be delegated?
> I understand that for example absent instructions otherwise the DPL is
> our expendature approval point for SPI (and presumably the other trusted
> organizations).
>
> Would the governing
On 14/03/19 at 12:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:05 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Also, from the DPL POV, it would be very useful to have an annual
> > report on Debian finances. I don't know if this exists nowadays.
>
> Some of the TOs have annual reports, the SPI one
lucas wrote:
> What could work is a group of people that are elected together, agree
> beforehand on how to share the various areas of responsibility, and
> synchronize very frequently to align their views. But it's probably hard
> to be efficient in the typical Debian setup, and to determine a
22 matches
Mail list logo
