> > The CRA and PLD proposals include regulations, that will be detrimental
> > to free and open source software
>
> We've never had such a long option, and I'm worried this will break for
> some people trying to vote when it gets wrapped to the next line. But it
> might also just be fine. There
On Wednesday, 14 September 2022 22:00:26 +07 Holger Levsen wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'm looking seconds for this new proposal below, which is like
> proposal E plus *also* offering free installer image.
>
> Rationale: we should keep producing fully freely distributable
> Debian installer images, for
> > > =
> > >
> > > The Debian project is permitted to make distribution media (installer
> > > images
> > > and live images) containing packages from the non-free section of the
> > > Debian
> > > archive available for download alongside with the free media in a
> I hereby propose the following alternative text to Steve's original proposal.
>
> =
>
> The Debian project is permitted to make distribution media (installer images
> and live images) containing packages from the non-free section of the Debian
> archive
> >> I think it would be clearer to add "that" between "confirm" and
> >> "their":
> >>
> >> {+ public, but developers will be given an option to confirm that
> >> their vote is included in the votes+} cast.
>
> Judit> I agree. It makes this option diverge a bit from the
> I think it would be clearer to add "that" between "confirm" and "their":
>
> {+ public, but developers will be given an option to confirm that their
> vote is included in the votes+} cast.
I agree.
It makes this option diverge a bit from the Option A it was forked from,
but since the
> > + At least 4K Developers have sponsored any single ballot
> > option
> > + which says the votes will be kept secret.
I think, 4K puts the bar very high (that would require 20 people).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I propose a ballot option for the GR
"Hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote"
that makes the following changes to the constitution.
1) Do not make the identity of a voter casting a particular vote public.
6) Codify that our election system must permit independent verification
> > I've also got concerns about batching up unrelated changes, with
> > potentially controversial ones. And even if minor I'd prefer to see
> > those debundled, even at the cost of additional GRs.
>
> If the only contentious point is the secrecy of votes, we could have an
> amendment that
> With the use cases of GRs coming to my mind (I certainly forgot some) I would
> consider as useful to have the following standard options on each ballot:
>
> [... other options ... ]
>
> [ ] Further discussion
> [ ] Do nothing, leave the question unresolved
> [ ] None of the above
>
>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
