> That is a big gray area, but restrictions exist in
> the US [3]
The Hatch Act only applies to Employees of the United States Federal
Government from engaging in political activity using their official
position (in the case of a regular, and not restricted federal
employee). You can't engage in
> While I also agree with Paul that the current name is somewhat dated
> technologically, it is not fatally flawed. Therefore, I think we
> should leave the naming decision to the FTP masters themselves.
This doesn't change anything about this thread or this email, but in the spirit
of trying to
this last month but it
doesn't look to be updated fully. I don't know if it's A, B or A & B that's
flagging for you
paultag
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 3:14 PM Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 05:13:28PM -0400, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> > > Under 4.1.5 of the Constitution
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> Under 4.1.5 of the Constitution, the developers by way of GR are the body
> who has the power to issue nontechnical statements.
>
>
https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io/blob/main/index.md
> is a statement which I believe
Seconded
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019, 3:54 PM Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and
> cross-distribution cooperation
> >
> > This resolution is a position statement under section 4.1 (5)
5 matches
Mail list logo
