Alessio Treglia writes (Re: Amendment (Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of
choice of init systems)):
Il giorno dom, 19/10/2014 alle 14.59 +0100, Ian Jackson ha scritto:
I hereby formally propose the amendment below (Constitution A.1(1)
`directly by proposer'), and, then, immediately accept
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Ian Jackson
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
Alessio Treglia writes (Re: Amendment (Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of
choice of init systems)):
Il giorno dom, 19/10/2014 alle 14.59 +0100, Ian Jackson ha scritto:
I hereby formally propose
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 02:59:16PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
(CC secretary@ to avoid this getting overlooked in the mail flood.)
I hereby formally propose the amendment below (Constitution A.1(1)
`directly by proposer'), and, then, immediately accept it (A.1(2)).
This resets the minimum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
(CC secretary@ to avoid this getting overlooked in the mail flood.)
I hereby formally propose the amendment below (Constitution A.1(1)
`directly by proposer'), and, then, immediately accept it (A.1(2)).
This resets the minimum discussion period
Hi,
Il giorno dom, 19/10/2014 alle 14.59 +0100, Ian Jackson ha scritto:
I hereby formally propose the amendment below (Constitution A.1(1)
`directly by proposer'), and, then, immediately accept it (A.1(2)).
This resets the minimum discussion period (A.2(4)).
For the avoidance of any doubt,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ian Jackson writes (Amendment (Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of
init systems)):
And, renumber the already-existing section 3 to be section 4:
- 3. Notes and rubric
+ 3. Notes and rubric
Don points out to me in private
6 matches
Mail list logo
