Jonas Smedegaard dijo [Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:52:31PM +0200]:
> > Hmm, debconf.org says "Copyright Software in the Public Interest,
> > Inc", but there is no imprint or anything. DebConf as such is not
> > listed as a separate project on https://www.spi-inc.org/projects/; of
> > course it
Jonathan Dowland writes:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but Debconf is not formally a part of Debian,
> and so cannot be bound by the outcome of a GR anyway.
This is the sort of thing that would be good to clear up as part of the
process of making Debian a more formal organization. I don't want to
Holger Levsen writes:
> the CCC e.V. association OTOH was formed as a legal entity to protect
> individuals.
To be clear, this sort of outcome may well be the correct outcome of "give
Debian legal existence." In other words, the goal doesn't need to be to
form a non-profit with the name
Regarding the following, written by "Russ Allbery" on 2022-04-08 at 10:17 Uhr
-0700:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Debconf is not formally a part of
Debian, and so cannot be bound by the outcome of a GR anyway.
This is the sort of thing that would be good to clear up as part of
the process of
martin f krafft writes:
> … I recommend you don't even start trying. Not only is it going to be a
> massive bikeshed, DebConf also basically requires a legal entity in
> whatever country we choose for our next holiday camp. And so yeah,
> DebConf is never going to be formally a part of Debian.
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 01:35:14PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Debian does not exist, legally :-)
and that's a feature, not a bug.
the CCC e.V. association OTOH was formed as a legal entity to protect
individuals.
it's possible to go both ways to achieve some of the same goals, but the
current
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 10:19:27PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 01:35:14PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Debian does not exist, legally :-)
I'm repeating others, but I think it's important to repeat:
This may not be true. At least in the US, existence is a matter of
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 04:17:42PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Half the people on this planet are living in countries that did not
approve the "Aggression against Ukraine" UN resolution, including
many Debian contributors.
The proposed GR text makes no reference to that UN resolution, so I
don't
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 08:21:39PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
If a Debconf location is also considered a political statement as you
imply then we have to choose Debconf locations by means of GR, starting
with a GR right now whether Debian wants to consider Kosovo a
self-determined sovereign
On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 10:44 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 08:21:39PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > If a Debconf location is also considered a political statement as
> > you
> > imply then we have to choose Debconf locations by means of GR,
> > starting
> > with a GR
Hi Jonathan
On 2022/04/08 11:44, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Debconf is not formally a part of Debian,
and so cannot be bound by the outcome of a GR anyway.
Due to how DebConf started and how it evolved, and the pace that they
had to move on to get things done, they
Quoting Ansgar (2022-04-08 12:46:59)
> On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 10:44 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 08:21:39PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > If a Debconf location is also considered a political statement as
> > > you imply then we have to choose Debconf locations by
12 matches
Mail list logo
