Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Ilu writes: > Am 08.12.23 um 21:13 schrieb Russ Allbery: >> How about: >> CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to FOSS > This would be real-english-english? ;-) If it has the same meaning, fine > by me. I've pinged Santiago. Yeah, casually you would normally stick "that

Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-08 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 23:04, Bart Martens wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:06:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 08/12/23 at 21:58 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > [ ] Choice 1: CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to > > > FOSS > > > [ ] Choice 2: The EU

Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-08 Thread Bart Martens
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:06:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/12/23 at 21:58 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > [ ] Choice 1: CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to FOSS > > [ ] Choice 2: The EU should clarify that non-commercial FOSS is exempted > >

Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-08 Thread Santiago Ruano Rincón
El 08/12/23 a las 21:37, Ilu escribió: > Am 08.12.23 um 21:13 schrieb Russ Allbery: > > Ilu writes: > > > > > CRA + PLD proposals include regulations, that will be detrimental > > > to FOSS > > > > How about: > > > > CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to FOSS > > > >

Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-08 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 08/12/23 at 21:58 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > [ ] Choice 1: CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to FOSS > [ ] Choice 2: The EU should clarify that non-commercial FOSS is exempted "non-commercial FOSS" sounds like CC BY-NC-SA (which is not FOSS). What this option is

Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-08 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:39:38PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Hi, > > I've updated the page at https://www.debian.org/vote/2023/vote_002 which > the current status. Here is the draft ballot: Voting period starts 2023-12-09 00:00:00 UTC Votes must be received by 2023-12-22

Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-08 Thread Ilu
Am 08.12.23 um 21:13 schrieb Russ Allbery: Ilu writes: CRA + PLD proposals include regulations, that will be detrimental to FOSS How about: CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to FOSS This would be real-english-english? ;-) If it has the same meaning, fine by me.

Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Ilu writes: > CRA + PLD proposals include regulations, that will be detrimental > to FOSS How about: CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to FOSS -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)

Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-08 Thread Ilu
Am 08.12.23 um 20:55 schrieb Judit Foglszinger: The CRA and PLD proposals include regulations, that will be detrimental to free and open source software We've never had such a long option, and I'm worried this will break for some people trying to vote when it gets wrapped to the next line. But

Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-08 Thread Judit Foglszinger
> > The CRA and PLD proposals include regulations, that will be detrimental > > to free and open source software > > We've never had such a long option, and I'm worried this will break for > some people trying to vote when it gets wrapped to the next line. But it > might also just be fine. There

Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-08 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 08:43:33PM +0100, Ilu wrote: > The CRA and PLD proposals include regulations, that will be detrimental > to free and open source software We've never had such a long option, and I'm worried this will break for some people trying to vote when it gets wrapped to the next

Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-08 Thread Ilu
The CRA and PLD proposals include regulations, that will be detrimental to free and open source software Am 08.12.23 um 20:40 schrieb Kurt Roeckx: The CRA and PLD will be detrimental to open source software

Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-08 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Since the vote will start in a few hours, I need options for the other 2 options. My best attempts so far: A: The CRA and PLD will be detrimental to open source software B: The EU should clarify that non-commercial open source is exempted C: The EU should not overrule DFSG 6 and FOSS licenses

Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-07 Thread Bart Martens
May I suggest for proposal C: "The EU should not overrule DFSG 6 and FOSS licenses" On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 07:19:44AM +0300, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Can people make suggestions for the ballot options text? > > Kurt > > On November 30, 2023 12:39:38 AM GMT+03:00, Kurt Roeckx > wrote: > >Hi, > >

Re: CRA and PLD vote status

2023-12-06 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Can people make suggestions for the ballot options text? Kurt On November 30, 2023 12:39:38 AM GMT+03:00, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >Hi, > >I've updated the page at https://www.debian.org/vote/2023/vote_002 which >the current status. > >We're at the maximum discussion period of 3 weeks, so the vote

CRA and PLD vote status

2023-11-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, I've updated the page at https://www.debian.org/vote/2023/vote_002 which the current status. We're at the maximum discussion period of 3 weeks, so the vote will probably start the 10th of December. Kurt