Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
orphaning this package because I dont have a AWE32/64 anymore.
The package is bug free but upstream isn't working on it anymore
--
Noèl Köthe noel debian.org
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
orphaing this package because I don't use it regular anymore and want to
concentrate on some of my packages.
upstream is acive and the only open bug is that camstream is i386
specific.
--
Noèl Köthe noel debian.org
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
signature.asc
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
orphaing this package because I don't use it regular anymore and want to
concentrate on some of my packages.
--
Noèl Köthe noel debian.org
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
orphaning this package because I don't use it regular anymore and want
to concentrate on some of my packages.
--
Noèl Köthe noel debian.org
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 01:25:57PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
orphaing this package because I don't use it regular anymore and want to
concentrate on some of my packages.
upstream is acive and the only open bug is that camstream is i386
specific.
I am
Am Son, 2003-06-29 um 15.32 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 01:25:57PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
orphaing this package because I don't use it regular anymore and want to
concentrate on some of my packages.
upstream is acive and the
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-29
Severity: wishlist
Since the ffmpeg ITP (#157719) was closed almost one year ago, I
assume no one is interested anymore, thus this ITP. I use ffmpeg daily
and I am not satisfied with the reasons given for closing the ITP. If
anyone
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 08:31:42PM -0700, Mark Hedges wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-28
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: perlapi-5.6.1
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.some.org/
*
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 05:11:58PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
Since the ffmpeg ITP (#157719) was closed almost one year ago, I
assume no one is interested anymore, thus this ITP. I use ffmpeg daily
and I am not satisfied with the reasons given for closing the ITP. If
anyone disagrees I'll
License question resolved.
--jay
-Forwarded Message-
From: Daniel Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Net::SCP::Expect licensing question (for Debian packaging)
Date: 28 Jun 2003 22:54:23 -0600
Hi Jay,
Oops - guess I should've included that.
retitle 197817 ITP: libnet-scp-expect-perl -- Wrapper for scp that allows
passwords to be sent via Expect
thanks
I'll take this module. It's available at
http://jay.bonci.com/?node=libnet-scp-expect-perl
It'll get uploaded when I get more stuff sponsored.
--jay
--
Jay Bonci
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 19:51:13 +1000, Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: debbackup
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003, Andrew Suffield wrote:
The reasons given for closing the ITP were moronic, however there is a
more pressing problem. ffmpeg is in the same boat as mjpegtools, in
that it implements algorithms such as mpeg-2 encoders, which are
patented and aggressively enforced by the
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Millis Miller wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: email
Version : 1.9.0
Upstream Author : Dean Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.cleancode.org/email
* License : Custom
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 11:12:56PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
The reasons given for closing the ITP were moronic, however there is a
more pressing problem. ffmpeg is in the same boat as mjpegtools, in
that it implements algorithms such as mpeg-2 encoders, which are
patented and aggressively
Benj. Mako Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: email
I understand that email is the name of the upstream client but I'd
like to urge you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a Debian package ready for the 1.1 release of GNU lightning and plan
to upload it to the archives within a week if no objections apply.
- Marco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 03:33:16PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
E) Email does binary attachments and uses MIME (mime types, base64
encoding) to attach and send them with the message. You can't do this
by doing what is described
Hi Marc!
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 10:43:14PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
What you are proposing is a great idea that deserves careful planning.
Let me ramble on for a minute.
The backup script should probably call up a list of packages on the
system, build from these list a list of files
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
* License : Custom
Its license is non-free, not Custom:
* Copyright (C) 2001 email by Dean Jones
*
* This source and program come as is, WITHOUT ANY
On Friday, Jun 27, 2003, at 11:05 US/Eastern, Luca - De Whiskey's - De
Vitis wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
* License : Custom
Its license is non-free, not Custom:
*
...
SHALL NOT BE RE-SOLD OR REDISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PRIOR AGREEMENTS WITH
21 matches
Mail list logo
