Bug#1012720: ITP: golang-k8s-apimachinery -- Handle Kubernetes-like API objects

2023-12-31 Thread Nicolas Schier
On Sat 30 Dec 2023 13:32:44 GMT, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Hi, > > is there any advance on > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-k8s-apimachinery.git > ? > > I could help with it. thanks. It seems to me that you took over already :) My latest version is at

Bug#1012720: RFS: golang-github-google-gnostic-models/0.6.8-1 [ITP] -- Protocol buffer models for gnostic

2023-12-22 Thread Nicolas Schier
Hi Nilesh, On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:10:27PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 08:35:38AM +0100, Nicolas Schier wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've packaged golang-github-google-gnostic-models, and I need a sponsor > > to get it uploaded. The package is a

Bug#1012720: golang-k8s-apimachinery: Please remove protected references from salsa repo

2023-12-21 Thread Nicolas Schier
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:01:23PM +0530 Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 09:49:48AM +0100, Nicolas Schier wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 09:44:31AM +0100 Nicolas Schier wrote: > > ah, I forgot to mention that 'uscan' does choose the "correct" upst

Bug#1012720: golang-k8s-apimachinery: Please remove protected references from salsa repo

2023-12-20 Thread Nicolas Schier
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 09:44:31AM +0100 Nicolas Schier wrote: > Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:44:31 +0100 > From: Nicolas Schier > To: debian...@lists.debian.org > Cc: 1012...@bugs.debian.org, n.sch...@avm.de > Subject: golang-k8s-apimachinery: Please remove protected references fro

Bug#1012720: golang-k8s-apimachinery: Please remove protected references from salsa repo

2023-12-20 Thread Nicolas Schier
Hi, while attempting to take-over ITP #1012720 for golang-k8s-apimachinery, I am struggling with the current repository state at salsa [1]. The current state was auto-generated by dh-make-golang but has (at least) these flaws: * upstream branch contains non-upstream commit, preventing

Bug#1012720: RFS: golang-github-google-gnostic-models/0.6.8-1 [ITP] -- Protocol buffer models for gnostic

2023-12-19 Thread Nicolas Schier
Hi, I've packaged golang-github-google-gnostic-models, and I need a sponsor to get it uploaded. The package is a requirement for golang-k8s-apimachinery (cp. #1012720). Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-google-gnostic-models.git Changelog:

Bug#1012720: ITP: golang-k8s-apimachinery -- Handle Kubernetes-like API objects

2023-12-18 Thread Nicolas Schier
Control: owner -1 ! Hi Bartek, On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 02:02:55PM +0100 Bartosz Fenski wrote: > So is someone working on that ITP currently? > Seems it's one of many missing dependencies for k9s tool which I'm working > on. yes, the actual packaging of golang-k8s-apimachinery does not seem to

Bug#1053000: ITP: golang-github-google-gnostic-models -- Protobuf models and libraries for gnostic-supported API formats

2023-12-18 Thread Nicolas Schier
Hi Arthur, are you still working on packaging golang-github-google-gnostic-models? For packaging the newer versions of glab, we need several new golang packages and one of them is golang-github-google-gnostic-models. For my local tests, I failed using the default 'dh-make-golang' but had to

Bug#1012720: ITP: golang-k8s-apimachinery -- Handle Kubernetes-like API objects

2023-11-13 Thread Nicolas Schier
Hi Domenico, do you still plan to finish the packaging of golang-k8s-apimachinery shortly? In order to update glab package to v1.35.0 the package is needed; may we offer help or would it be ok for you if someone else takes-over your ITP? Kind regards, Nicolas On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at

Bug#969482: ITP: glab -- An open-source GitLab command line tool

2023-07-10 Thread Nicolas Schier
FTR: Unit193 uploaded an initial version yesterday, it is pending in the new queue. Kind regards, Nicolas

Bug#969482: Update golang-github-xanzy-go-gitlab from 0.73 to 0.85

2023-06-12 Thread Nicolas Schier
Dear go-packaging-team, for packaging the 'glab' CLI tool [1] we need golang-github-xanzy-go-gitlab >= 0.83. For my local packaging test I prepared an update to 0.85 and created corresponding merge-requests: * Branch upstream: Import new upstream version 0.85.0

Bug#969482: ITP: glab -- An open-source GitLab command line tool

2023-06-09 Thread Nicolas Schier
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:23:19PM -0500 Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2020-09-03 16:21:32, TODO wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: TODO > > > > * Package name: glab > > Version : 1.10.0-1 > > Upstream Author : Clement Sam > > * URL :

Bug#935329: RFP: git-revise -- handy git tool for doing efficient in-memory commit rebases & fixups

2019-09-26 Thread Nicolas Schier
Hi Antoine, > [...] > Could you hook up the test suite in autopkgtest somehow? I prepared a debian/tests/control, but upstream's test suite does not successfully run on any of my Debian machines, neither when I run 'tox' (as suggested in docs/contributing.rst), nor if I call pytest-3

Bug#935329: RFP: git-revise -- handy git tool for doing efficient in-memory commit rebases & fixups

2019-09-07 Thread Nicolas Schier
> On 2019-09-05 18:38:09, Nicolas Schier wrote: > > Dear Antoine, > > > >> > Antoine, could you create a repository in salsa's 'debian' > >> > namespace? > >> > (My salsa account is 'nsc-guest'). > >> > >> Done: https://sal

Bug#935329: RFP: git-revise -- handy git tool for doing efficient in-memory commit rebases & fixups

2019-09-05 Thread Nicolas Schier
Dear Antoine, > > Antoine, could you create a repository in salsa's 'debian' > > namespace? > > (My salsa account is 'nsc-guest'). > > Done: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/git-revise thanks for your fast reaction! Right now, I do not have any permissions than to create merge requests for

Bug#935329: RFP: git-revise -- handy git tool for doing efficient in-memory commit rebases & fixups

2019-09-03 Thread Nicolas Schier
Control: retitle -1 ITP: git-revise -- handy git tool for doing efficient in-memory Control: owner -1 nico...@fjasle.eu Hei, I have started packaging git-revise [1], would like to take over the package maintainance and already got an warm ack from upstream for Debian packaging. Right now I am

Bug#913880: ITP: overlay-userns -- Overlay mounting in user namespaces (DKMS)

2018-11-20 Thread Nicolas Schier
salsa merge request? Kind regards, Nicolas From 8e09f86b72903c29bff005425bee997fa9521147 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Schier Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:16:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ovl: permit overlayfs mounts in user namespaces (taints kernel) Permit overlayfs mounts within user name

Bug#913880: ITP: overlay-userns -- Overlay mounting in user namespaces (DKMS)

2018-11-16 Thread Nicolas Schier
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nicolas Schier * Package name: overlay-userns Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Nicolas Schier * URL : https://rocketgit.com/user/nicolas/overlay-userns-dkms * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description

Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: O: moreutils -- additional Unix utilities

2014-11-30 Thread Nicolas Schier
unarchive owner 759732 nico...@hjem.rpa.no stop -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141201042004.ga12...@larvik.hjem.rpa.no