On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 12:04:35 +0100 W. Martin Borgert wrote:
(out of curiosity moved to debian-legal)
(I guess you intended to ask to keep the other recipients in Cc: if so,
you should ask explicitly)
On 2011-03-05 23:46, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
gnetworktester seems to parse the output
Miriam Ruiz mir...@debian.org wrote:
In general, I wouldn't consider parsing the output of another
program to de a derivative work.
In general, I do agree with Miriam that parsing the output of another
program does not make a derivative work. But just to give an example
of where it does
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:23:22AM -0800, Walter Landry wrote:
Miriam Ruiz mir...@debian.org wrote:
In general, I wouldn't consider parsing the output of another
program to de a derivative work.
In general, I do agree with Miriam that parsing the output of another
program does not make a
--nextPart2958378.qgascxSZ95
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sunday 06 March 2011 11:04:35 W. Martin Borgert wrote:
(out of curiosity moved to debian-legal)
=20
On 2011-03-05 23:46, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
gnetworktester seems to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/06/2011 11:51 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 12:04 +0100, W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
(out of curiosity moved to debian-legal)
On 2011-03-05 23:46, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
gnetworktester seems to parse the
Miriam Ruiz mir...@debian.org wrote:
In general, I wouldn't consider parsing the output of another
program to de a derivative work.
In general, I do agree with Miriam that parsing the output of another
program does not make a derivative work. But just to give an example
of where it does
2011/3/8 Mahyuddin Susanto udi...@ubuntu.com:
Parsing the output of a program doesn’t make a derivative work. However,
if this parsing is vital for the operation of the application and makes
it useless without that program, what is the difference with dynamic
linking to a library? To a
Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 12:04 +0100, W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
(out of curiosity moved to debian-legal)
On 2011-03-05 23:46, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
gnetworktester seems to parse the output of nmap and nmap upstream at
http://insecure.org/nmap/data/COPYING gives me the impression
The distinction between a derivative work and a separate work is not
based on technology but on functionality.
Parsing the output of a program doesn’t make a derivative work. However,
if this parsing is vital for the operation of the application and makes
it useless without that program, what is
Le mardi 08 mars 2011 à 07:30 -0800, Ken Arromdee a écrit :
Parsing the output of a program doesn’t make a derivative work. However,
if this parsing is vital for the operation of the application and makes
it useless without that program, what is the difference with dynamic
linking to a
Le mercredi 09 mars 2011 à 11:27 +, Noel David Torres Taño a
écrit :
Miriam Ruiz mir...@debian.org wrote:
In general, I do agree with Miriam that parsing the output of another
program does not make a derivative work. But just to give an example
of where it does happen, git is largely
(out of curiosity moved to debian-legal)
On 2011-03-05 23:46, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
gnetworktester seems to parse the output of nmap and nmap upstream at
http://insecure.org/nmap/data/COPYING gives me the impression that
gnetworktester would thus be derivative work.
IANAL, but since
12 matches
Mail list logo
