Hi,
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it
over. If I don't hear anything in a week, I'll go ahead and remove it
from testing.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:45:08 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi,
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it
over. If I don't hear
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Michael Gilbert
michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:45:08 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi,
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:20:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org writes:
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the depending packages to see if they'd be
Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org writes:
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it
over. If I don't hear anything in a week, I'll
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org wrote:
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it
over. If I don't
6 matches
Mail list logo
