> Hi all, Hello Baptiste
> it makes me sad to see cctbx going back to RFP, unfortunately this is > closer to the truth as far as I'm concerned. this is the standard procedure, cctbx is not yet ready for inclusion after one year, so ITP -> RFP. now , I did not managed to work on cctbx since I need first to tackle the ccp4 part... Once his will be done, I think that it will be easyer to work on cctbx. > I still have interest in the package, but interest is not enough. Due to > real life problems (moving homes, unforseen difficulties with a paid > assignment), I have not been able to work on it at all since last february. Yes I understand, so I hope that your problems will find solutions. thanks for the great work you already done on cctbx > I can't tell yet when I've got more time available. For this reason, I > won't change the bug back to ITP until I've got some work done. If > anybody else feels like working on it before I do, go for it. And if you > have any questions, feel free to ask me. Indeed the gir repository of the cctbx packaging is still available in Debian science. Cheers Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b1ca6...@sun-dag1.synchrotron-soleil.fr
