Bug#829046: recap

2017-12-29 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Friday, December 29 2017, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On 12/29/2017 11:45 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > >> I would also like to notice that I'm still working on my personal copy >> of the repository, located at: >> >> https://git.sergiodj.net/debian/pagure.git/ >> >> Although I appreciate

Bug#829046: recap

2017-12-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 12/29/2017 11:45 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > I would also like to notice that I'm still working on my personal copy > of the repository, located at: > > https://git.sergiodj.net/debian/pagure.git/ > > Although I appreciate the help from Boyuan Yang, I think the pagure.git >

Bug#829046: recap

2017-12-29 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Friday, December 29 2017, I wrote: > On Friday, December 29 2017, I wrote: > >> On Thursday, December 28 2017, bill auger wrote: >> >>> at this point i think the first thing to do is to verify the packaging >>> state of the dependencies noted previously (re-posted below) and to >>> see that

Bug#829046: recap

2017-12-29 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Friday, December 29 2017, I wrote: > On Thursday, December 28 2017, bill auger wrote: > >> at this point i think the first thing to do is to verify the packaging >> state of the dependencies noted previously (re-posted below) and to >> see that any remaining dependencies that need packaging

Bug#829046: recap

2017-12-29 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Thursday, December 28 2017, bill auger wrote: > at this point i think the first thing to do is to verify the packaging > state of the dependencies noted previously (re-posted below) and to > see that any remaining dependencies that need packaging should have > themselves ITP issues attached to