Bug#836409: RFP: libjs-emojione -- Open source emoji set

2016-11-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 17:51:05 +1000 Ben Finney wrote: > My understanding is that the package is only worth putting in Debian > so that other software can make use of it. What part is needed, and > how would this package be useful without the artwork? We have emojione.js

Bug#836409: RFP: libjs-emojione -- Open source emoji set

2016-09-04 Thread Ben Finney
On 04-Sep-2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Sunday, September 04 2016, Ben Finney wrote: > > > On 02-Sep-2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > >> Probably just a part of the upstream tarball needs to be packaged > >> (the JS part). > > > > What about the artwork, which seems to be the main

Bug#836409: RFP: libjs-emojione -- Open source emoji set

2016-09-03 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Sunday, September 04 2016, Ben Finney wrote: > On 02-Sep-2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Probably just a part of the upstream tarball needs to be packaged >> (the JS part). > > What about the artwork, which seems to be the main point of the > package? Or are you saying that this Debian

Bug#836409: RFP: libjs-emojione -- Open source emoji set

2016-09-03 Thread Ben Finney
On 02-Sep-2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Probably just a part of the upstream tarball needs to be packaged > (the JS part). What about the artwork, which seems to be the main point of the package? Or are you saying that this Debian package would include none of the artwork? I have raised

Bug#836409: RFP: libjs-emojione -- Open source emoji set

2016-09-02 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sergio Durigan Junior * Package name: libjs-emojione Version : 2.2.6 Upstream Author : Ranks.com * URL : https://github.com/Ranks/emojione * License : Expat Programming Lang: JavaScript and