On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 07:00:17PM +0100, Dr. Markus Waldeck wrote:
I might have noticed this earlier, but was unfamiliar
with fonts using codes past 0x.
The oldest known script is sumerian cuneiform.
I searched for free fonts and found George Douros fonts
which were included in
I might have noticed this earlier, but was unfamiliar
with fonts using codes past 0x.
The oldest known script is sumerian cuneiform.
I searched for free fonts and found George Douros fonts
which were included in Debian after an wnpp.
Fortunately the fonts use Unicode encoding
which I
Package: xterm
Version: 229-1
Severity: normal
I tested the fonts in the package ttf-ancient-fonts.
The work fine with openoffice and eclipse.
But if I start an xterm with -fa Akkadian only glyphs
below \u are displayed.
Is this a limitation in xterm?
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:40:08AM +0100, Dr. Markus Waldeck wrote:
Package: xterm
Version: 229-1
Severity: normal
I tested the fonts in the package ttf-ancient-fonts.
The work fine with openoffice and eclipse.
But if I start an xterm with -fa Akkadian only glyphs
below \u are
yes. TrueType fonts might not have this limitation, but bitmap
fonts have only the XDrawString16 interface to write characters.
xterm is translating codes outside 0-0x to the replacement
character.
(I should investigate this further - thanks for the reminder)
Thank you for the answer!
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 05:10:08PM +0100, Dr. Markus Waldeck wrote:
yes. TrueType fonts might not have this limitation, but bitmap
fonts have only the XDrawString16 interface to write characters.
xterm is translating codes outside 0-0x to the replacement
character.
(I should
6 matches
Mail list logo
