On 9/6/07, Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Are there packages out there, which work on general seqences (i.e. are
independent of the type of the sequence). The utility sort comes to my
mind, wich can work on many different types (numbers, strings, dates)
What you describe is
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
We had a short discussion on IRC about your proposal, and as far as we
are concerned, Option 2. would be Ok for us (obviously Option 1. would
also be ok, since we wouldn't have anything to do with that ;-). We
would like to put the following tags in
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 09:11 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
We had a short discussion on IRC about your proposal, and as far as we
are concerned, Option 2. would be Ok for us (obviously Option 1. would
also be ok, since we wouldn't have anything to
Dear all,
I was a bit lazily waiting for the conversation to settle before trying
to aswer :)
+Tag: field::biology:bioinformatics
+Tag: field::biology:molecular
+Tag: field::biology:structural
This is probably a reasonable distinction, though we have to decide if
we want such a
Hello,
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 20:30 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Dear all,
I was a bit lazily waiting for the conversation to settle before trying
to aswer :)
+Tag: field::biology:bioinformatics
+Tag: field::biology:molecular
+Tag: field::biology:structural
This is probably a
Le Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:21:57PM +0200, Benjamin Mesing a écrit :
There are two more things to consider:
1. the users who do searching based on tags and
2. the people doing the tagging.
With each tag, the complexity of the vocabulary will be increased and
only a small percentage
Hello
Thus we need to decide, if those details should become
part of the main vocabulary database.
Well, I don't think that we should make a harsh difference compared
to the main vocabulary database. Considering the effect of a less
fine grained tagging: People will be presented a list
Hello,
I believe it is past time to react to this proposal, we don't want to be
seen as some kind of black hole, everything that goes in never comes
out. And since I have some spare time at hand, I will make a start.
Generally speaking the proposed tags are relativly detailed. I believe
this
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
I believe it is past time to react to this proposal, we don't want to be
seen as some kind of black hole, everything that goes in never comes
out. And since I have some spare time at hand, I will make a start.
Generally speaking the proposed tags are
Hello,
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 12:10:30 Benjamin Mesing wrote:
Generally speaking the proposed tags are relativly detailed. I believe
this level of detail is required only by biologists or people in the
medical field. Thus we need to decide, if those details should become
part of the
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Steffen Moeller wrote:
* When thinking about automated installations of software (i.e. in grid
computing) we need a language that allows us to talk about what is eligible
for installations and what is not. Debtags are not perfect and other efforts
describing various kinds
Hi Debtags team !
This is the monthly reminder that the Debian-Med team proposed new tags
in May,
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/2007-May/001630.html
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/2007-July/001658.html
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
12 matches
Mail list logo
