[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag H. Wanvik) writes:
Hi,
I recently changed my sanity in ant.properties from insane to sane and
did:
ant clobber all buildjars
and found that the buildjars target still built insane jars. I needed
to do another
ant buildjars
for ant to build the sane jars. Is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag H. Wanvik) writes:
Hi,
I recently changed my sanity in ant.properties from insane to sane and
did:
ant clobber all buildjars
and found that the buildjars target still built insane jars. I needed
to do another
ant buildjars
for
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 05:37:39PM -0700, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
The fragment of code that runs much slower is :
If you take those 8 lines of code and put them into a standalone
Java program (by, say, changing the assert() to a println()), and
run the standalone Java program on your two
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 02:55:13PM -0700, Ramandeep Kaur wrote:
Hi Ugo,
I saw you have opened DERBY-2467 to convert lang/updateCursor.java to JUnit.
Actually as you did not add information on
*http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/LangJunitTestConversion
*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484757
]
John H. Embretsen commented on DERBY-2480:
--
I tried the patch, DERBY-2480-1.diff, and it seems to fix this
Hi,
when looking at the code it seems to me that the probe values are
set by the constructor, and then cloned on each new openCore(). I don't
think this approach is compatible with re-using internal result sets
(see DERBY-827), because when re-executing a prepared statement with
different
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484764
]
Felix Beyer commented on DERBY-2487:
Why did you choose to spell explain without the e in the code?
There`s no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484770
]
Felix Beyer commented on DERBY-2487:
note to answer of question 1) The UUID is hold in the stmt_id attribute o
On 3/27/07, Jeffrey Clary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't attach them before because of their size, but here you go.
A few questions:
- it appears you are building 10.2.2.0 here. 10.2.2.0 still supports
JDK 1.3.1 and requires a set of 1.3.1 runtime classes be available and
that j13lib in
Hi Derby community!
There is a patch for new explain functions. Please inspect the JIRA Issue
Derby-2487 to see the XPLAIN extensions.
I hope the attached documents answer all arising questions.
Is it okay to attach a zip file version of the demo application to the
JIRA issue? I want to get some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484782
]
Dyre Tjeldvoll commented on DERBY-827:
--
Thanks for the feedback AB. Here are some answers:
AB If so, could we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484789
]
Julius Stroffek commented on DERBY-2460:
I only thought that if we do thinks like running tests from classes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484790
]
Kristian Waagan commented on DERBY-1949:
In a patch I recently reviewed:
if (searchStr == )
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484820
]
Oleksandr Alesinskyy commented on DERBY-1949:
-
Yes, I definitely had misread the documentation. While it
Implement Blob support for Locators
---
Key: DERBY-2496
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2496
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Øystein Grøvlen
DERBY-2347 adds the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484836
]
Peter Nedonosko commented on DERBY-1017:
Hi, I work on a next version of the eXo JCR product (eXo Platform).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484857
]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-2493:
---
Replacing the Hashtable with a HashMap was trivial, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484860
]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-2493:
---
It seems like the ordering is already a problem in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julius Stroffek reassigned DERBY-2432:
--
Assignee: Julius Stroffek
Implement a transaction time out for XA transactions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484868
]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-2491:
---
If I have read the patch correctly,
Thanks for the review. This is the first time I have contributed any code (one
line ;-) to Derby. At this point will the fix be picked up by a submitter or
is there something else I need to do to make sure it gets into the next release?
-Original Message-
From: John H. Embretsen
I've been reading at thread on this list discussing a 10.3 release
candidate in early May. Are there any 10.2.x fix releases planned
between now and then?
Thanks,
Jeff
[Auto-generated mail]
*tinderbox_trunk16* 523256/2007-03-28 12:02:30 CEST
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Suite
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
0373373 0 100.78% derbyall
F:0,E:172557254 0
Jeffrey Clary wrote:
I’ve been reading at thread on this list discussing a 10.3 release
candidate in early May. Are there any 10.2.x fix releases planned
between now and then?
Thanks,
Jeff
Hi Jeff,
No one has suggested this yet. My gut feeling is that we will feel
pressure to produce a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484905
]
Kim Haase commented on DERBY-1934:
--
Uh-oh, we've got colliding JIRAs. DERBY-2090 (fixed recently) was actually a
Jeffrey Clary wrote:
Thanks for the review. This is the first time I have contributed any code (one
line ;-) to Derby. At this point will the fix be picked up by a submitter or
is there something else I need to do to make sure it gets into the next release?
I see that you have set the
Issue Subscription
Filter: Derby: JIRA issues with patch available (16 issues)
Subscriber: derby-dev
Key Summary
DERBY-1949 locate function returns invalid value when first parameter is empty
string
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1949
DERBY-2467 Convert
[Auto-generated mail]
*Daily* 522555S1/2007-03-26 18:00:10 CEST
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Suite
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
lin
NA NA NANA derbyall
NA NA NANA suitesAll
sles
NA
convert lang/coalesceTests.java to junit
Key: DERBY-2497
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2497
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Test
Components: Test
Reporter:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when looking at the code it seems to me that the probe values are
set by the constructor, and then cloned on each new openCore(). I don't
think this approach is compatible with re-using internal result sets
(see DERBY-827), because when re-executing a prepared statement
NullPointerException on ClientDataSource.getConnection() when
ds.setdatabaseName was invalid
-
Key: DERBY-2498
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2498
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-2466:
-
Attachment: derby-2466-04.diff
Committed derby-2466-04.diff at subversion revision 523399.. This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-2490:
--
The best info for store provided nested info should be in the iapi javadoc
where you get the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484926
]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-2491:
Whoops! Meant to attach my response to the review comments to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bryan Pendleton updated DERBY-1949:
---
Attachment: rrefsqlj61998.html
docs_v2.diff
Thanks Oleksandr for the review
it depends on what the test is testing, but I usually consider these
ordering dependencies a test bug - ie. they are counting on an order not
specified by SQL. For .sql tests there are usually 2 possible fixes:
1) If what is being tested is not affected by adding an order by to
the query, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
A B resolved DERBY-2256.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 10.3.0.0
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Thank you very much
Update Tuning Guide documentation to reflect the new static IN list
transformation that occurs as a result of DERBY-47.
---
Key: DERBY-2499
URL:
Laura Stewart (JIRA) wrote:
In the Tuning Guide, the IN operator is mentioned in the optimization and query
sections, as shown below:
snip sections
Thank you, Laura. I filed DERBY-2499 for documentation of the new IN list
behavior. I'll try to look into this sometime in the near future...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484923
]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-2493:
Thanks for the review, Knut! I appreciate it.
checkDistinctRows
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484928
]
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-2498:
---
ClientConnectionPoolDataSource also gives a NPE if the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Laura Stewart reassigned DERBY-2499:
Assignee: Laura Stewart
Update Tuning Guide documentation to reflect the new static IN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484941
]
Kim Haase commented on DERBY-2489:
--
Thanks for this excellent documentation, Rick.
Just a few doc nits:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484942
]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2490:
--
Thanks Mike, I think this info is essential to add to
Unfortunately, as a new Derby contributor, I am still working the kinks out of
my building and testing. I haven't been able to get a clean baseline test for
derbyall, and I haven't tried suites.All. I'll get to that eventually, but
maybe in the meantime a submitter will see in JIRA that you
Jeffrey Clary wrote:
Unfortunately, as a new Derby contributor, I am still working the kinks out of
my building and testing. I haven't been able to get a clean baseline test for
derbyall, and I haven't tried suites.All. I'll get to that eventually, but
maybe in the meantime a submitter will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484984
]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-2476:
The new test looks good, one minor comment:
Instead of putting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484985
]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-47:
--
Hi Army, I just checked in a converted JUnit test for the old
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484994
]
A B commented on DERBY-47:
--
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for reporting this! My guess is that the difference between the
JUnit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484998
]
Suresh Thalamati commented on DERBY-700:
Thanks a lot for summarizing the problems and possible solutions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485002
]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-47:
--
Hah! I had already deleted all the properties files for the old tests in
[Auto-generated mail]
*tinderbox_trunk16* 523429/2007-03-28 20:12:45 CEST
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Suite
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
0373373 0 100.79% derbyall
F:0,E:172557254 0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485008
]
A B commented on DERBY-47:
--
1. shall I open a new issue for the test failure?
Yes, I think that'd be good. Note though
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485010
]
Stan Bradbury commented on DERBY-2488:
--
Thanks, Dan, for the information. I realized the results of this test
Assertion failure preparing query with AND and OR in where clause
-
Key: DERBY-2500
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2500
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485028
]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-47:
--
Army Note though that this is an actual engine bug, not just a test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485029
]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-2316:
--
Thanks for this improvement, Ole! Replacing the compatibiltiy driver
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
A B reassigned DERBY-2500:
--
Assignee: A B
Assertion failure preparing query with AND and OR in where clause
Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote:
and since all the tests pass with or without ruleBasedOptimization set to true,
I'll leave that off. Not really worth investigating, since it seems to have no
effect on the new test.
Unless of course setting that property to true revealed an error once upon a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485033
]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2488:
--
No, there are two data sources versions, the 40 ones
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel John Debrunner reopened DERBY-1496:
--
NSSecurityMechanismTest has this TODO in it:
// TODO: sleep
[Auto-generated mail]
*tinderbox_trunk16* 523476/2007-03-29 00:02:45 CEST
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Suite
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
0373373 0 100.31% derbyall
F:0,E:172557254 0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew McIntyre closed DERBY-2491.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 10.3.0.0
Committed new test to repository with
63 matches
Mail list logo