Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
Hi,
I realize I haven't said what I wanted to go on the 10.3 branch at this
point.
I would like to minimize the changes to what has been identified as
critical issues at this point; once we have a release, the 'normal'
rules for backporting to a branch apply.
So,
On 7/11/07, Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
Hi,
I realize I haven't said what I wanted to go on the 10.3 branch at this
point.
I would like to minimize the changes to what has been identified as
critical issues at this point; once we have a
Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
On 7/11/07, Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
Hi,
I realize I haven't said what I wanted to go on the 10.3 branch at this
point.
I would like to minimize the changes to what has been identified as
critical issues at this
On 7/11/07, Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
On 7/11/07, Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
Hi,
I realize I haven't said what I wanted to go on the 10.3 branch at this
point.
I would like to minimize the
I am happy to allow reasonable control by the release manager. For
instance I think it is very reasonable if it makes their job easier - I
am very happy for the work they are doing. For example I think it is
very reasonable for a release manager to ask for a short hiatus
from the time they
Hi,
I realize I haven't said what I wanted to go on the 10.3 branch at this point.
I would like to minimize the changes to what has been identified as
critical issues at this point; once we have a release, the 'normal'
rules for backporting to a branch apply.
So, Kathey, if you could backport
