Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
I had that on my list to look at, but they seem to be the not so open
Apache JDO project. Do they have a site at apache?
I don't spot a site yet, but the jdo-dev@db.apache.org list is quite
active -- and open. (Truthfully, I'm only
derby-dev@db.apache.orgSubject: Re: Increase acceptance of Derby across Apache??Jean T. Anderson wrote:Daniel John Debrunner wrote:I had that on my list to look at, but they seem to be the "not so open"Apache JDO project. Do they have a site at apache?I don't spot a site yet, but the jdo-de
I was wondering how Derby could get more visibility and more use in
other Apache projects. I see that other Apache projects could use or
refer to Derby in any of the following ways:
- Included as an embedded database
- Included for example applications/tutorials
- Recommended for use in example
I am not able to help here, but I do want to note that the JDO project
in Apache is using Derby. And they still want to know why explicitly
specifying the schema name gives a 6x performance improvement :)
David
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
I was wondering how Derby could get more visibility
David Van Couvering wrote:
I am not able to help here, but I do want to note that the JDO project
in Apache is using Derby. And they still want to know why explicitly
specifying the schema name gives a 6x performance improvement :)
I had that on my list to look at, but they seem to be the
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
I had that on my list to look at, but they seem to be the not so open
Apache JDO project. Do they have a site at apache?
I don't spot a site yet, but the jdo-dev@db.apache.org list is quite
active -- and open. (Truthfully, I'm only intermittently lurking, but
