Re: Derby and Bitronix JTA connection failure

Brett Wooldridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello list, I am stuck trying to figure out an issue with using the Bitronix JTA Transaction Manager with Derby (v10.3.2.1). Here’s the details: I’m running Derby as a network server on the standard port. I have a unit test which uses the

Re: Derby and Bitronix JTA connection failure

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brett Wooldridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [ snip - details ] As you probably have figured out yourself, it is the SECCHK command which fails when you use the TXNMGR. I did notice that you are using a a different versions for the server andt the client. (10.3.2.1 rev

Out of date Tutorials

Dear Derby People, I'm trying to get Derby setup on my computer using the Derby Tutorials on your website. I have run into problems on the following page: http://db.apache.org/derby/papers/DerbyTut/install_software.html#derby_configure I am trying to follow the configure embedded derby step

Re: Re-using an existing db and archiving data

Mark Hiles wrote: I've just started using Derby for a uni project and have a couple of quick questions. When creating an embedded database, it seems to get overridden each time I run my application. How can I make it create a database the first time it runs, and then re-use it in the future?

Re: Re-using an existing db and archiving data

I've been using create=true and it just keeps overriding the existing db.. Someone mentioned to me that it might have something to do with the fact that I'm running an embedded version.. I'm not sure why that would matter but could that be it?

Re: Re-using an existing db and archiving data

Mark Hiles wrote: I've been using create=true and it just keeps overriding the existing db.. Someone mentioned to me that it might have something to do with the fact that I'm running an embedded version.. I'm not sure why that would matter but could that be it? What do you mean by

Re: Re-using an existing db and archiving data

Hi Mark, Any chance you can post some sample code? Just where you establish a connection? Might speed up narrowing down where the misunderstanding might be. Raymond On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Mark Hiles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been using create=true and it just keeps

Re: Re-using an existing db and archiving data

Mark Hiles wrote: I've been using create=true and it just keeps overriding the existing db.. Someone mentioned to me that it might have something to do with the fact that I'm running an embedded version.. I'm not sure why that would matter but could that be it? Any chance that you