Re: JMX Extensions to Derby

2006-06-02 Thread Bernt M. Johnsen
I suggest that the distributed services level should be optional. Only the agent level and the instrumentation level should be there by default. This will also comply with the current Derby architecture with embedded vs. the network server. Let me restate to make sure I understand what

Re: JMX Extensions to Derby

2006-06-01 Thread Øystein Grøvlen
Sanket Sharma wrote: I would also appreciate your suggestions on features the community would like to see being implemented as JMX extensions. On the top of my head: - Performancs statistics (e.g., transactions committed/aborted per second) - Change dynamic properties (e.g.,

Re: JMX Extensions to Derby

2006-06-01 Thread Bernt M. Johnsen
Øystein Grøvlen wrote (2006-06-01 09:24:18): Sanket Sharma wrote: I would also appreciate your suggestions on features the community would like to see being implemented as JMX extensions. On the top of my head: - Performancs statistics (e.g., transactions committed/aborted per second)

Re: JMX Extensions to Derby

2006-06-01 Thread Craig L Russell
On Jun 1, 2006, at 1:51 AM, Bernt M. Johnsen wrote: Øystein Grøvlen wrote (2006-06-01 09:24:18): Sanket Sharma wrote: I would also appreciate your suggestions on features the community would like to see being implemented as JMX extensions. On the top of my head: - Performancs

JMX Extensions to Derby

2006-05-31 Thread Sanket Sharma
Hey everyone... I´m a google SOC student assigned the task of adding JMX extensions to Derby! Before I actually start working on my project, I just thought of dropping a ´lil Hi to the community :-) I would also appreciate your suggestions on features the community would like to see being