[Bug 1632964] Re: Regression: systemd does not send all queued DBus Signals when a unit gets inactive

2016-11-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 229-4ubuntu12 --- systemd (229-4ubuntu12) xenial; urgency=medium * unit: sent change signal before removing the unit if necessary (LP: #1632964) * networkd: Fix assertion crash on adding VTI with IPv6 addresses (LP: #1633274)

[Bug 1632964] Re: Regression: systemd does not send all queued DBus Signals when a unit gets inactive

2016-11-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 231-9ubuntu1 --- systemd (231-9ubuntu1) yakkety; urgency=medium * debian/gbp.conf: Switch to yakkety branch * unit: sent change signal before removing the unit if necessary (LP: #1632964) * networkd: Fix assertion crash on adding

[Bug 1632964] Re: Regression: systemd does not send all queued DBus Signals when a unit gets inactive

2016-10-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 231-10 --- systemd (231-10) unstable; urgency=medium [ Martin Pitt ] * systemctl: Add --wait option to wait until started units terminate again. * nss-resolve: return NOTFOUND instead of UNAVAIL on resolution errors. This makes it

[Bug 1632964] Re: Regression: systemd does not send all queued DBus Signals when a unit gets inactive

2016-10-13 Thread Martin Pitt
So I suppose this got broken as a subtle side effect from https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?h =ubuntu-xenial=5c429176 (bug 1529079). Do you have a reproducer for this that we can use to verify the fix? ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided