I objected to closing this bug as duplicate because another bug is
marked a duplicate of this bug.
Which other bug report refers to the same issue? Is it #714088 which
seems to be the only other recent high importance bug reported on gnome-
settings-daemon?
--
You received this bug notification
bug #554280 seems similar for example
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725972
Title:
gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV
--
desktop-bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 554280 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554280
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 554280
gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash()
* You can subscribe to bug 554280 by following this link:
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been
reported, but feel free to report any other bugs you find.
** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Why did you mark this bug invalid? If it is a duplicate, you should mark
it a duplicate. At present, this does not seem to be the case.
However another bug, namely bug #725903 is marked a duplicate of /this/
bug.
** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = New
--
You
Changed status back, because of what I said in comment #6
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725972
Title:
gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV
--
doing closing and reopening on duplicate bugs just because the exact
numbers is not a really a win for anybody, it makes the bug list less
practical and waste time, you should better search for the duplicate
bug...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop
