[Bug 1574586] Re: Not able to rate/review snaps

2023-09-20 Thread Michael Vogt
** Project changed: snappy => snapd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574586 Title: Not able to rate/review snaps To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1598667] Re: No snapd API for account registration / password reset

2023-09-20 Thread Michael Vogt
** Project changed: snappy => snapd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1598667 Title: No snapd API for account registration / password reset To manage

[Bug 1555567] Re: [snaps] License information from the store not available

2023-09-20 Thread Michael Vogt
** Project changed: snappy => snapd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/167 Title: [snaps] License information from the store not available To manage

[Bug 1969097] Re: connecting interfaces with a udev rule triggers return to gdm login screen

2022-04-14 Thread Michael Vogt
This could be the solution https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/commit/307c683f00e1711973139837992ca0f6f55314a5 ** Also affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1969097] Re: connecting interfaces with a udev rule triggers return to gdm login screen

2022-04-14 Thread Michael Vogt
I just tested it and and with the attached debdiff I can no longer reproduce the problem. ** Patch added: "debdiff with the fix" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/1969097/+attachment/5580697/+files/gdm3_42.0-1ubuntu3.debdiff ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New =>

[Bug 1778936] Re: please re-add Support-system-image-read-only-etc.patch

2018-06-27 Thread Michael Vogt
** Patch added: "systemd_237-3ubuntu10.2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1778936/+attachment/5157097/+files/systemd_237-3ubuntu10.2.debdiff ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Bug 1778936] [NEW] please re-add Support-system-image-read-only-etc.patch

2018-06-27 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: The 16.04 version of systemd had a patch to support the read-only etc. For core18 we will also need this change because core18 is still not on a fully writable etc. I will attach a debdiff against the current bionic version of systemd. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1742637] Re: GNOME Software and snapcraft.io present developer identity differently

2018-02-14 Thread Michael Vogt
Unfortunately we need to revert this again because the display name can be changed in arbitrary ways by the developer. So it could be used to present misleading information. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1749000] [NEW] [patch] please add "AssumedApparmorLabel=unconfined" to service file

2018-02-12 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: There was a recent change in apparmor (https://cgit.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus/commit/?id=dc25979eb) that breaks snapd. The fix is simply to add the ++AssumedApparmorLabel=unconfined line to the service file so that activation works again. Attached is a debdiff with a

[Bug 1742637] Re: GNOME Software and snapcraft.io present developer identity differently

2018-01-24 Thread Michael Vogt
The above PR should fix things transparently for g-s (and our own cli). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1742637 Title: GNOME Software and snapcraft.io

[Bug 1742637] Re: GNOME Software and snapcraft.io present developer identity differently

2018-01-24 Thread Michael Vogt
https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/4532 ** Changed in: snapd Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1742637 Title: GNOME

[Bug 1723168] Re: snap pulsemixer use F1 gives helppage, not output

2018-01-16 Thread Michael Vogt
Assigning to gnome-terminal based on the feedback from ora. ** Package changed: snapd (Ubuntu) => gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1709536] Re: snapd 2.26.14 on ubuntu-core won't start in containers anymore

2018-01-02 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: snapd Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709536 Title: snapd 2.26.14 on ubuntu-core won't start in containers

[Bug 1717573] Re: Bad query error when searching in GNOME Software (special chars snap)

2018-01-02 Thread Michael Vogt
It seems what you need is the right error kind to distinguish this error, this is done in: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/4428 now ** Changed in: snapd Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 1724316] Re: "Sorry, something went wrong cannot authenticate to snap store ..." without any way to fix

2017-12-22 Thread Michael Vogt
The snapd side change got merged. ** Changed in: snapd Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1724316 Title: "Sorry, something

[Bug 1661590] Re: GNOME Software only supports running one application from a snap

2017-03-03 Thread Michael Vogt
https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/2982 ** Changed in: snappy Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661590 Title: GNOME

[Bug 1661590] Re: When launching a snap from Ubuntu Software, it runs the first command alphabetically

2017-02-07 Thread Michael Vogt
Adding Robert - is there anything you need from snapd to supoprt this? I think provide all the information if there are multiple apps in a single snap now? ** Also affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1631834] Re: Installed snaps show size as "Calculating..."

2017-01-27 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1631834 Title: Installed snaps show size as

[Bug 1659195] [NEW] resolver regression on ubuntu-core from #1636912

2017-01-24 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: We had a bunch of test failures in our automatic tests for snapd since this ~Saturday (21.01.2017). All on core, all with errors like: """ error: cannot install "test-snapd-tools": Get

[Bug 1650389] Re: Installing snapd on 14.04.5 desktop downgrades xorg et al.

2017-01-05 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650389 Title: Installing snapd on 14.04.5

[Bug 1603610] Re: Snaps have no screenshots

2016-11-29 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: snappy Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603610 Title: Snaps have no screenshots To manage

[Bug 1598667] Re: No snapd API for account registration / password reset

2016-11-29 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: snappy Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: snappy Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1598667 Title: No

[Bug 1631834] Re: Installed snaps show size as "Calculating..."

2016-11-17 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1631834 Title: Installed snaps show size as

[Bug 1564076] Re: Can't launch snaps

2016-06-22 Thread Michael Vogt
Setting to verification-done (for snapd) based on the feedback from Robert that he can use it in gnome-software now. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1564076] Re: Can't launch snaps

2016-06-20 Thread Michael Vogt
Fwiw, the snapd part of this bug (that is now in fix-commited state) is just a prerequisite for gnome-software to implement this feature. So just to be clear. The snapd change does not add the button but with the snapd change now gnome-software has all the information to add the button. -- You

[Bug 1561285] Re: snapd operations don't contain progress information

2016-04-20 Thread Michael Vogt
Progress for changes/tasks is available in snapd 2.0.x ** Changed in: snappy Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1561285

[Bug 1564076] Re: Can't launch snaps

2016-04-20 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: snappy Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: snappy Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564076 Title:

[Bug 1559038] [NEW] timespec parsing is wrong

2016-03-19 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: We are affected by upstream bug: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/2682 ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1387090] [NEW] boot breaks if /etc/machine-id is missing

2014-10-29 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: When no /etc/machine-id file is present the boot breaks. Once this bug is fixed we can modify live-build so that it remove /etc /machine-id from the generated live rootfs instead of truncating it. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged

[Bug 778054] Re: Trouble when removing transitional packages

2014-09-03 Thread Michael Vogt
The version of system-config-printer in utopic does no longer depend on python-gobject. ** Changed in: system-config-printer (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-utils

[Bug 1339244] Re: Comparison of exit_status in run_custom_command is wrong

2014-07-10 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1339244 Title:

[Bug 1339244] Re: Comparison of exit_status in run_custom_command is wrong

2014-07-10 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1339244 Title: Comparison of

[Bug 1265610] Re: [patch] Please display clock in screen lock

2014-01-07 Thread Michael Vogt
** Patch added: set clock to the right and add some padding https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1265610/+attachment/3942748/+files/17_remove_top_panel.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1265610] Re: [patch] Please display clock in screen lock

2014-01-07 Thread Michael Vogt
I put the clock on the right now and I don't mind if this gets removed in favor of a better lockscreen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265610 Title:

[Bug 1265610] Re: [patch] Please display clock in screen lock

2014-01-02 Thread Michael Vogt
This update will also fix the: (gnome-screensaver:19385): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_set_visible: assertion 'GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed messages that I noticed while testing my patch (note that this message is caused by the original patch, not my version :) ** Patch added: new

[Bug 1265610] [NEW] [patch] Please display clock in screen lock

2014-01-02 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: The current gnome-screensaver will not display the top panel under unity. This is fine as it does not fit with unity, however I really like the clock. Attached is a debdiff (and a updated 17_remove_top_panel.patch) that will show only the clock. If this looks good to you I'm

[Bug 1081691] Re: Launcher - Update the icons used for the Software Centre, Nautilus, and Software Updater

2012-12-10 Thread Michael Vogt
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/software-center/lp1081691 ** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1084851] Re: No system-wide proxy for automatic proxy setting method

2012-12-10 Thread Michael Vogt
This is a problem with gnome-control-center/ubuntu-system-services. The static proxy setting are written to /etc/environment and /etc/apt/apt.conf but this is not done for the automatic proxy settings. ** Summary changed: - Software centre fails to install software on system with system-wide

[Bug 1081631] Re: GNOME-Keyring endlessly prompts for password after I buy something from USC

2012-12-07 Thread Michael Vogt
Hi, this looks like a problem with the keyring, not software-center itself. I reassign for further inspection. ** Package changed: software-center (Ubuntu) = gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1083694] Re: crash/hang when submiting review updates

2012-11-28 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: Due to a error in the glib bindings submit a review or submiting usefulness data is very slow and often fails entirely: TEST CASE: - open software-center - go to a app with reviews - click on useful: YES - verify that it takes a long time - install

[Bug 1083694] Re: crash/hang when submiting review updates

2012-11-28 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: Due to a error in the glib bindings submit a review or submiting usefulness data is very slow and often fails entirely: TEST CASE: - open software-center - go to a app with reviews - click on useful: YES - - verify that it takes a long time + - verify that

[Bug 1083694] Re: crash/hang when submiting review updates

2012-11-27 Thread Michael Vogt
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #688067 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688067 ** Also affects: software-center via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688067 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Also affects: pygobject (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1032953] Re: update-notifier crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_ref()

2012-10-15 Thread Michael Vogt
From one of the dupes: update-notifier is unstable and crashes after unplugging (or maybe even plugging) canon camera. ** Visibility changed to: Public ** Package changed: update-notifier (Ubuntu) = gvfs (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Bug 1032953] Re: update-notifier crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_ref()

2012-10-15 Thread Michael Vogt
Looking at the backtrace it does not look like its a bug in update- notifier itself but in the gvfs library its using. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032953 Title:

[Bug 929437] Re: gvfsd-http crashed with SIGSEGV in __nscd_get_mapping()

2012-03-16 Thread Michael Vogt
@seb128: software-center is using gio and the gio http/https code, I suspect its a general defect there that happens to be triggered by both s-c and gwibber. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.

[Bug 929437] Re: gvfsd-http crashed with SIGSEGV in __nscd_get_mapping()

2012-03-16 Thread Michael Vogt
I don't think there is much that software-center can do here to fix it (short of not using gio anymore ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/929437 Title: gvfsd-http

[Bug 907568] Re: software-center crashed with SIGSEGV in PyGILState_Ensure()

2012-01-03 Thread Michael Vogt
The test program will crash on close. It works when GObject.threads_init() is removed. ** Package changed: software-center (Ubuntu Precise) = pygobject (Ubuntu Precise) ** Changed in: pygobject (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: Gary Lasker (gary-lasker) = (unassigned) ** Also affects:

[Bug 898712] [NEW] package nautilus 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 127

2011-12-01 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: Crashed during a lucid - precise upgrade on i386 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: nautilus 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Dec 1

[Bug 898712] Re: package nautilus 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 127

2011-12-01 Thread Michael Vogt
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898712 Title: package nautilus 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script

[Bug 898712] Re: package nautilus 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 127

2011-12-01 Thread Michael Vogt
Here is the error: Preparing to replace nautilus 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1 (using .../nautilus_1%3a3.2.1-0ubuntu4_i386.deb) ... /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: 6: dpkg-maintscript-helper: not found dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/nautilus_1%3a3.2.1-0ubuntu4_i386.deb (--unpack):

[Bug 854622] Re: Could not install libglib2.0

2011-09-30 Thread Michael Vogt
Hey Michael. I see this as well and we got some dupes, I think this is something real. Feel free to clean it up manually of course to get your box working again, but I think this bug is very real. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 854622] Re: Could not install libglib2.0

2011-09-30 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854622 Title: Could not install libglib2.0 To manage

[Bug 862139] [NEW] xset q reports DPMS mode with time 600 regardless of what g-c-c setting

2011-09-29 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: Regardless what setting I use in gnome-control-centers display capplet, my screen turns off after 10min. It turns out that DPMS is used: $ xset q DPMS (Energy Star): Standby: 600Suspend: 600Off: 600 DPMS is Enabled Monitor is On But I don't turn this on

[Bug 862139] Re: xset q reports DPMS mode with time 600 regardless of what g-c-c setting

2011-09-29 Thread Michael Vogt
I pushed a patch there that we may use, I hope to get some upstream feedback on this too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862139 Title: xset q reports

[Bug 860536] [NEW] Please integrate with software-center to search for new apps

2011-09-27 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: The current right-click/open with/other application/find applications could be improved by just offering to launch software-center with --search mime:text/html (or whatever mime-type). It should probably also a bit less nested ;) Like: open-with/Find available applications

[Bug 854622] Re: Could not install libglib2.0

2011-09-23 Thread Michael Vogt
Note that I can not reproduce this in a chroot when installing libglib2.0-0 and 2.0-data oneiric nor when upgrading such a chroot from natty. ** Also affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed

[Bug 806018] Re: software-properties-gtk crashed with TypeError in __init__(): must be an interface

2011-07-25 Thread Michael Vogt
Here is the traceback, looks like something in python/GI is broken: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/software-properties-gtk, line 25, in module from gi.repository import Gtk File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gi/importer.py, line 76, in load_module

[Bug 760707] Re: Applet descriptions are not extracted for translation

2011-04-21 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Low Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760707 Title: Applet descriptions are not

[Bug 760707] Re: Applet descriptions are not extracted for translation

2011-04-21 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu Natty) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Low = Medium ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 760707] Re: Applet descriptions are not extracted for translation

2011-04-21 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: + TEST CASE: + - as this is really just a fix for the pot template there is no risk for the update + - a normal regression test (does it install, does it still starts) is enough + - we need to check the pot once the package is available to ensure its properly imported

[Bug 760707] Re: Applet descriptions are not extracted for translation

2011-04-21 Thread Michael Vogt
Uploaded to natty-proposed now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760707 Title: Applet descriptions are not extracted for translation -- desktop-bugs mailing

[Bug 426215] Re: [UIF exception] apt:package-name isn't handled by the Store when appropriate

2011-04-21 Thread Michael Vogt
Uploaded the desktop-file-utils change now to natty. ** Package changed: apturl (Ubuntu) = desktop-file-utils (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: desktop-file-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 703230] Re: rm: cannot remove `/usr/share/doc/libpango1.0-0': Is a directory when updating to 1.28.3-4

2011-03-25 Thread Michael Vogt
I upoaded a simple fix for this now. I'm not sure how the system got into the situation that resulted in a dir instead of a symlink though. But even then, it should not fail. ** Changed in: pango1.0 (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 642913] Re: python wnck bindings have broken constants again

2011-03-24 Thread Michael Vogt
Uploaded to {lucid,maverick}-proposed now, waiting for approval. ** Description changed: Bug 447479 got fixed in libwnck (the constants should have been registered as flags, not as enums) but a workaround also got put in to python's wnck bindings (register constants as enum instead of

[Bug 740387] Re: graphical corruption with multiple drivers and classic desktop

2011-03-23 Thread Michael Vogt
Here is the releveant changelog entry: [ Ugo Riboni ] * debian/patches/16-capture-before-unmap: add an option to capture a pixmap of each window before it's unmapped (e.g. minimized or moved to another workspace. This is saved in a property of the window and can be retrieved by

[Bug 494096] Re: Clicking the title of a window is bringing a window underneath it into focus

2011-02-23 Thread Michael Vogt
** Patch added: debdiff for lucid-proposed upload https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/494096/+attachment/1867354/+files/metacity_2.30.1-0ubuntu1.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 494096] Re: Clicking the title of a window is bringing a window underneath it into focus

2011-02-23 Thread Michael Vogt
I added a test case for the SRU but I'm not in the best position to judge if that are ideal test-case instructions. Please update if appropriate, I will upload to lucid-proposed now. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-session + + + TEST CASE: + 1) Open a terminal + 2)

[Bug 494096] Re: Clicking the title of a window is bringing a window underneath it into focus

2011-02-23 Thread Michael Vogt
This is in lucid-proposed now (twice actually because the initial upload was not mentioned here). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494096 Title: Clicking the title

[Bug 364136] Re: held back on upgrade

2011-02-16 Thread Michael Vogt
This is part of u-m trunk so I close this bugtask. ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu.

[Bug 45544] Re: Notifications overlap the bottom panel.

2011-02-16 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: notification-daemon (Ubuntu) Assignee: Michael Vogt (mvo) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45544 Title: Notifications overlap the bottom panel

[Bug 384878] Re: [gnome-network-properties] Unable to apply proxy system-wide

2011-02-16 Thread Michael Vogt
I can no longer reproduce this problem. It works fine in my tests in natty (and maverick). Please reopen if you still experience this bug. ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 692791] Re: Lots of Evolution packages are left behind after uninstallation and some are removed without a clear rationale

2010-12-21 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks for your bugreport. The package manager (apt-get, aptitude, USC) is able to deal with the situation via the auto-installed information. This was pointed out by Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre already. But because of bug #424643 this auto-installed information is not properly written for the default

[Bug 692791] Re: Lots of Evolution packages are left behind after uninstallation and some are removed without a clear rationale

2010-12-21 Thread Michael Vogt
About the other aspect of the bug that is releated to USC. What exaclty is the bug here? USC will use the auto-installed information to remove no longer needed packages if a package is removed. And it will also display a list of packages that are going to be removed. -- You received this bug

[Bug 687732] [NEW] gtk.Label a href link-activate signal broken in natty

2010-12-09 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: The attached test program works fine in maverick but fails in natty. In a nutshell, when clicking on the link in the label nothing happens in natty but I expect that it prints something (which it does in maverick). Oddly keyboard navigation (pressing enter on it) works.

[Bug 687732] Re: gtk.Label a href broken in natty

2010-12-09 Thread Michael Vogt
** Attachment added: link.py https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687732/+attachment/1760557/+files/link.py ** Summary changed: - gtk.Label a href broken in natty + gtk.Label a href link-activate signal broken in natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 687732] Re: gtk.Label a href link-activate signal broken in natty

2010-12-09 Thread Michael Vogt
It turns out this only happens when compiz is running, so I reassign. ** Package changed: pygtk (Ubuntu) = compiz (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Sam SmSpillaz Spilsbury (smspillaz) -- You

[Bug 683531] [NEW] panel not there after maverick - natty upgrade with no 3d

2010-12-01 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel After upgrading from maverick to natty alpha-1 I get a empty desktop on login. No panel or anything, just the background and a cursor. I can see that gnome-session is running and a bunch of tasks etc. Starting the panel manually gives me a

[Bug 683531] Re: panel not there after maverick - natty upgrade

2010-12-01 Thread Michael Vogt
While this is part of the release notes for alpha1 I think it would be better to show *something* even if its just a zenity dialog saying sorry, logout and select classic session. ** Summary changed: - panel not there after maverick - natty upgrade + panel not there after maverick - natty

[Bug 683531] Re: panel not there after maverick - natty upgrade with no 3d

2010-12-01 Thread Michael Vogt
It turns out there is a killall gnome-panel gnome-panel in compiz for the fallback (didrocks was kind enough to dig that out). Changing to ; fixes the issue nicely and it starts fine again. -- panel not there after maverick - natty upgrade with no 3d https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683531 You

[Bug 486154] Re: System beep broken in Karmic despite heroic efforts to fix it

2010-11-22 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks a lot Robert for looking into this problem and for your patch. I do not feel comfortable enough with the code to judge if that will not have regresions. It would be great if upstream would comment. I noticed that you forward it to the gnome bugzilla (thanks for this). But it looks like

[Bug 633370] Re: package gconf2 2.31.91-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: No such file or directory: '/usr/share/gconf/defaults/20-edubuntu'

2010-10-07 Thread Michael Vogt
For gconf I commited a fix to bzr and upload it to maverick (its in the queue) now. ** Changed in: gconf (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- package gconf2 2.31.91-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: No such file or directory: '/usr/share/gconf/defaults/20-edubuntu'

[Bug 655334] Re: package shared-mime-info 0.71-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 134

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Vogt
Here is the error: Preparing to replace python-lazr.restfulclient 0.9.11-1ubuntu1 (using .../python-lazr.restfulclient_0.9.11-1ubuntu1.1_all.deb) ... Segmentation fault dpkg: warning: old pre-removal script returned error exit status 139 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ...

[Bug 633370] Re: package gconf2 2.31.91-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: No such file or directory: '/usr/share/gconf/defaults/20-edubuntu'

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Vogt
The 20-edubuntu file is part of edubuntu-artwork -- package gconf2 2.31.91-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: No such file or directory: '/usr/share/gconf/defaults/20-edubuntu' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633370 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 633370] Re: package gconf2 2.31.91-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: No such file or directory: '/usr/share/gconf/defaults/20-edubuntu'

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Vogt
This is a dangling symlink from the previous package it seems, the lucid version has: echo Setting desktop defaults ... if [ -L /usr/share/gconf/defaults/20-edubuntu ]; then rm -f /usr/share/gconf/defaults/20-edubuntu ln -s /usr/share/edubuntu-artwork/gconf/$theme

[Bug 633370] Re: package gconf2 2.31.91-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: No such file or directory: '/usr/share/gconf/defaults/20-edubuntu'

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Vogt
It looks like we have two issues here: a) update-gconf-defaults should check if the file actually exists (for broken symlinks) b) edubuntu-artwork needs remove the symlink -- package gconf2 2.31.91-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: No such file or directory:

[Bug 620297] Re: gdebi-gtk fails with ''dpkg: unable to read filedescriptor flags....

2010-09-24 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: gdebi (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Low = Medium -- gdebi-gtk fails with ''dpkg: unable to read filedescriptor flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620297 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vte in

[Bug 620297] Re: gdebi-gtk fails with ''dpkg: unable to read filedescriptor flags....

2010-09-24 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: gdebi (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- gdebi-gtk fails with ''dpkg: unable to read filedescriptor flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620297 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 620297] Re: gdebi-gtk fails with ''dpkg: unable to read filedescriptor flags....

2010-09-03 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: vte (Ubuntu Maverick) Milestone: ubuntu-10.10-beta = ubuntu-10.10 -- gdebi-gtk fails with ''dpkg: unable to read filedescriptor flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620297 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 620297] Re: gdebi-gtk fails with ''dpkg: unable to read filedescriptor flags....

2010-09-02 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: vte (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: vte (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: vte (Ubuntu Maverick) Milestone: None = ubuntu-10.10-beta ** Changed in: vte (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided = Medium --

[Bug 620297] Re: gdebi-gtk fails with ''dpkg: unable to read filedescriptor flags....

2010-09-02 Thread Michael Vogt
This broke because 91_keep_fds got dropped. While the C interface now exports enough functionatlity now to replace it (vte_terminal_new, vte_terminal_pty_new, vte_pty_child_setup, vte_terminal_set_pty) its not possible yet to do it with python-vte. The whole vte stuff is not yet exported afaiks.

[Bug 625859] Re: Please fix escaping of UTF-chars in ui file

2010-08-30 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu) Milestone: None = ubuntu-10.10-beta ** Also affects: glade (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 625859] Re: Please fix escaping of UTF-chars in ui file

2010-08-30 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: glade (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: glade (Ubuntu) Milestone: None = ubuntu-10.10-beta ** Changed in: glade (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- Please fix escaping of UTF-chars in ui file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625859 You received

[Bug 607596] Re: Could not determine the upgrade

2010-07-20 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks for your bugreport. If this happens on maverick its omst likely a transient problem, please try again in a bit when the archive has caught up. ** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Could not determine the upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607596 You

[Bug 606784] Re: package python-vte 1:0.23.5-0ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

2010-07-20 Thread Michael Vogt
Here is the error: Preparing to replace python-vte 1:0.23.5-0ubuntu1 (using .../python-vte_1%3a0.23.5-0ubuntu1.1_i386.deb) ...^M File /usr/sbin/update-python-modules, line 213^M SyntaxError: Non-ASCII character '\xe8' in file /usr/sbin/update-python-modules on line 213, but no encoding

[Bug 574837] Re: package libgtk2.0-dev 2.20.0-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gir-1.0/GdkPixbuf-2.0.gir', which is also in package gobject-introspection-repository

2010-06-25 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- package libgtk2.0-dev 2.20.0-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gir-1.0/GdkPixbuf-2.0.gir', which is also in package gobject-introspection-repository 0:0.6.5-0ubuntu1

[Bug 574837] Re: package libgtk2.0-dev 2.20.0-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gir-1.0/GdkPixbuf-2.0.gir', which is also in package gobject-introspection-repository

2010-06-25 Thread Michael Vogt
While testing this with the automatic upgrade tester I found a bug in the dpkg status parser for the non-interactive upgrade case. Its fixed in bzr now but I will do a SRU for it because landscape (and possible others) use the non-interactive upgrade mode. ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu

[Bug 574837] Re: package libgtk2.0-dev 2.20.0-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gir-1.0/GdkPixbuf-2.0.gir', which is also in package gobject-introspection-repository

2010-06-25 Thread Michael Vogt
This works for me with the packages in -proposed. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- package libgtk2.0-dev 2.20.0-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gir-1.0/GdkPixbuf-2.0.gir', which is also in package

[Bug 585196] Re: emacs fails to start: X protocol error

2010-06-01 Thread Michael Vogt
I set this to medium because it breaks unrelated applications. If more than emacs breaks it should IMO be set to high. ** Also affects: emacs23 (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Low Assignee: Cody

[Bug 583845] Re: Does not detect hotplugged storage device (8.04 - 10.04 upgraded)

2010-05-28 Thread Michael Vogt
The same(?) issue is discussed in the forums here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1470705 It looks like a dup of #539515, I will check on that as well. -- Does not detect hotplugged storage device (8.04 - 10.04 upgraded) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583845 You received this bug

[Bug 583845] [NEW] Does not detect hotplugged storage device (8.04 - 10.04 upgraded)

2010-05-21 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gvfs Does not auto mount SD card inserted via usb card reader. This is a upgraded system from 8.04 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gvfs 1.6.0+git20100414-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >