[Bug 1094061] [NEW] trivial build products should not be in source package

2012-12-27 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported: Packaging trivial build products such as shell/cc-shell-marshal.{c,h} unnecessarily complicates building from source, __especially__ since debian/patches/60_ubuntu_nav_bar.patch renders the originals invalid anyway. Consider the typical approach for shadowing the package

[Bug 1094075] [NEW] gnome-control-center should not have hard dependency on gnome-icon-theme-symbolic

2012-12-27 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported: A hard dependency on a icon theme package makes replacing that package impossible (or ugly in the extreme by using Breaks). At most, use a Recommends dependency. Even better would be to use a virtual package for symbolic icons ;) ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1093938] Re: gnome-panel should not have hard dependency to gnome-icon-theme-symbolic

2012-12-27 Thread Peter Hurley
Hi Jeremy, Firstly, I think you didn't look closely at the code snippet that I included. As packaged, gnome-panel does not render the icons for the user menu, so it doesn't really matter if the icons are found or not (that is, no functionality is broken by not having gnome-icon-theme- symbolic

[Bug 1093938] [NEW] gnome-panel should not have hard dependency to gnome-icon-theme-symbolic

2012-12-26 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported: 1. An icon theme file should not be a hard dependency. How would a different icon theme provide alternate icons? 2. The 4 symbolic icons referred to are part of the now-defunct User menu, which no longer draws the icons anyway: static GtkWidget *

[Bug 962458] Re: [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
@Sebastien, Before I report this upstream, is there a reason why you believe this is an upstream bug and not related to any of the *over 6000 lines* of debian + ubuntu patches? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 968769] [NEW] Symbolic power icons look out-of-place with non-symbolic theme

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported: The power plug-in preferentially selects '*-symbolic' icons first (in plugins/power/gpm-common.c:gpm_upower_get_device_icon). This looks out-of-place with non-symbolic indicators -- see attached screenshot. ** Affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 968769] Re: Symbolic power icons look out-of-place with non-symbolic theme

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
** Attachment added: Screenshot of notification area https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968769/+attachment/2964321/+files/symbolic_power_icons_seem_wrong.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in

[Bug 968769] Re: Symbolic power icons look out-of-place with non-symbolic theme

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
Attached is a screenshot of notification area with appropriate icon usage (icons are from gnome-power-manager). ** Attachment added: UPS icon from gnome-power-manager

[Bug 968772] [NEW] gnome-power-manager icons should be part of theme

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported: Now that gnome-power-manager is no longer part of the notification/indicator subsystem, it's status icon set should be moved into the 'gnome' icon theme. The absence of appropriate icons is forcing devs to economize with poor substitutions. For example, the power plug-in of

[Bug 968772] Re: gnome-power-manager icons should be part of theme

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
** Attachment added: Screenshot of 'UPS charged' notification with 'gnome' icon theme https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968772/+attachment/2964338/+files/symbolic_power_icons_seem_wrong.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 968772] Re: gnome-power-manager icons should be part of theme

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
** Attachment added: Screenshot with gnome-power-manager icons substituted https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-icon-theme/+bug/968772/+attachment/2964339/+files/icons_from_gnome_power_manager.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 968772] Re: gnome-power-manager icons should be part of theme

2012-03-29 Thread Peter Hurley
Cross-reference to corresponding bug #968769 in gnome-settings-daemon wrt using '*-symbolic' icon names. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-icon-theme in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968772 Title:

[Bug 965487] Re: [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in engine_update_composite_device()

2012-03-27 Thread Peter Hurley
@RedSingularity, As I expected and noted, this bug is *not* a duplicate of bug# 962458, as confirmed by the completed i386 stack backtrace. This bug dies in engine_update_composite_device, whereas the amd64 stack backtrace for bug# 962458 indicates that crash @ engine_get_icon_priv. In the

[Bug 962458] Re: [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV

2012-03-27 Thread Peter Hurley
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 965487 [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in engine_update_composite_device() -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.

[Bug 966697] [NEW] Transparent panel has themed widgets

2012-03-27 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported: GTK+ 3.4 has introduced a bug with transparent panels. Specifically, upstream gtk+ commit 7603e6e4 breaks setting the background-image style property to a cairo pattern. This is the method that gnome-panel uses to simulate transparent backgrounds. ** Affects: gnome-panel

[Bug 966697] Re: Transparent panel has themed widgets

2012-03-27 Thread Peter Hurley
NB: I logged this bug against gnome-panel because that's where it's going to be seen, but it's actually a bug in GTK -- the upstream bug is against GTK. ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #672858 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672858 ** Also affects: gnome-panel via

[Bug 962458] Re: [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV

2012-03-26 Thread Peter Hurley
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 965487 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965487 Bug 964654 may not be a duplicate. That report has no valid stack backtrace to confirm that it even originates from the same function, and it's on a different arch. Please un-duplicate this bug. -- You

[Bug 960757] Re: whoopsie crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_newv()

2012-03-22 Thread Peter Hurley
This crash happened while trying to install Precise Beta 1 22/03/12 from LiveCd. See bug# 962455 and bug# 962458. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960757 Title:

[Bug 828392] Re: light-themes don't display well in gnome-panel 3+

2012-03-02 Thread Peter Hurley
It seems that this bug is becoming sort of a meta-bug for several issues in different packages. Bug 885691 (which was marked a duplicate of this) specifically addressed the themed background gradient not drawn correctly. A patch to gnome- panel was submitted for that bug and the upstream bug,

[Bug 924098] [NEW] bluetooth-applet doesn't autostart in Classic desktop

2012-01-30 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported: Gnome-bluetooth version 3.2.0-0ubuntu2 on oneiric When logging in 'Classic desktop', the bluetooth-applet is not autostarted. This happens because the autostart .desktop file ('/etc/xdg/autostart /bluetooth-applet.desktop') erroneous specifies the AutostartCondition=GNOME3

[Bug 913637] [NEW] --with-sub-version build option is always - (should be -revision)

2012-01-08 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported: An error in debian/rules causes the -with-sub-version build option to always be set to -, regardless of the changelog version. NB: debian/rules is a makefile and make *always* expands $. To prevent $ expansion (so that awk substitution works), use $$ instead. ** Affects:

[Bug 913637] Re: --with-sub-version build option is always - (should be -revision)

2012-01-08 Thread Peter Hurley
** Patch added: Fix_blank_sub_version.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913637/+attachment/2663657/+files/Fix_blank_sub_version.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 799203] Re: Regression of bug #433714

2011-06-30 Thread Peter Hurley
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 06:10 -0400, Omer Akram wrote: I just switched to Guest session and started empathy and I had the option there to setup IRC account and it worked. ** Summary changed: - Regression of bug #433714 + cannot add IRC account during initial setup This report (and the

Re: [Bug 799203] Re: Regression of bug #433714

2011-06-20 Thread Peter Hurley
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 16:00 -0400, Brendan Donegan wrote: Hi, I'm on a fresh install of Natty and I don't have this problem. After selecting 'Yes, I have an existing account I want to use' (I think that's the option) I can choose IRC as an account type, among a long list of others. Is this

[Bug 799203] [NEW] Regression of bug #433714

2011-06-18 Thread Peter Hurley
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: empathy Initial bug report is here (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/433714) This is a regression in Natty - it's not possible to setup an IRC account without creating some other account (non-IRC) in Empathy first. ProblemType:

[Bug 799203] Re: Regression of bug #433714

2011-06-18 Thread Peter Hurley
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799203 Title: Regression of bug #433714 To manage notifications about this bug go to: