I use the attached script to increase the window borders to 4 pixels in
ubuntu-2D and gnome-fallback. It must be placed in /etc/X11/Xsession.d/
and works in precise by writing configuration files in the directory
$HOME/.themes of the current user.
** Attachment added: 50_light-themes-borders
It seems that the attachment was not included in the previous message.
** Attachment added: Increase light themeswindows borders
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/160311/+attachment/3508551/+files/50_light-themes-borders
--
You received this bug notification because
The bug is still present in precise, with the same pam configurations
for winbind and krb5.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856269
Title:
lightdm does not ask for a
This bug is fixed in precise, even when the password is in expiration
period.
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
The bug report for lightdm is: #856269.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613371
Title:
Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in expiration
period
Status
I observed the same behaviour on a ThinkPad T61, but after installation,
not on live session. The list of access points was not visible on first
login, but it was after logging out and in. However, after reinstalling
the system with a new image cd (14-Apr-2012), I'm no more able to
reproduce the
Same problem here:
lightdm hangs immediately after entering the password and displays a black
screen.
After killing lightdm I can see that the home directory was not created.
Instead this works well when using GDM or a console login.
The bug can be reproduced in this way for a local user: just
@Miklos: you are right. I copied your shotwell binaries in my gtk ppa,
thank you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749986
Title:
Resizing LO window from bottom right
I posted a comment on https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/869501,
which I think should be describing the same problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856269
Title:
The bug affecting unity was really in compiz and is now marked as fixed:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/953839
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu.
I confirm that in precise the invisible window borders are no more present and
the resize process is again difficult.
Maybe this is because unity-window-decorator has been replaced by
gtk-window-decorator?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages,
In unity the bug has been fixed using invisible window grip support through
compiz and unity-window-decorator.
See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/160311/comments/246
The resize difficulties remains only when using unity-2d.
--
You received this bug notification because
Are there any plans to address this bug for unity-2d, after having marked it as
critical? Recently the resize grips in the bottom right corner have been
entirely removed from precise, leaving the resize process of windows very
difficult in unity-2d.
I use the attached script
Using the overlay scrollbar to resize is not very intuitive and can be
used only to drag horizontally. Moreover the scrollbar is visible only
if the window has a scrollable content, hence is not a general solution.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Will the changes be backported to oneiric?
In any case I have made available (in a PPA) gtk+2.0 packages for oneiric with
the 044_grips.patch removed:
https://launchpad.net/~renbag/+archive/gtk
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
You can create a file named .gtkrc-2.0 in your home directory and put
the same content reported in the bug description, i.e.:
style default-style
{
GtkWindow::resize-grip-height = 0
GtkWindow::resize-grip-width = 0
}
class GtkWidget style default-style
This will disable the resize grips
I was now able to test lightdm when a password is in expiration period and I
have to say that in this case the bug is not fixed.
Should it be reopened or a new bug reported?
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you
Then maybe https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/869501 is a duplicate
of this one?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856269
Title:
lightdm does not ask for a new
@apollothethird
Did you edit the script in comment #13, as explained in comment #19 for
oneiric? You can also manually check if the files listed in the script were
effectively changed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
The temporary workaround I described in comment #13 is valid for oneiric
also. Just edit it and substitute 'natty' with 'oneiric'. I'm using it
in rc.local since several months and had no problems.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
With lightdm 1.0.0-0ubuntu4 the bug is solved, at least for the case of
cached_login.
I cannot test lightdm with a password is in expiration period (have to wait for
it) but I suppose that it should be the same.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
With regard to Bug #856269 , which is marked as duplicate of this one, I have
found that when the password of a domain user is expired, lightdm still does
not present the correct steps to change the password.
Here is what happens (lightdm messages are inside ):
1 - -- (first enter
Public bug reported:
I'm using an up-to-date oneiric workstation joined through samba and
winbind to an AD domain controlled by a Windows server.
When the password of a domain user is expired and when pam_winbind is
used as first authentication, lightdm does not ask for a new password
and does
Configuration and log files for the pam_krb5 authentication.
** Attachment added: lightdm_pam-krb5.tgz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/856269/+attachment/2439844/+files/lightdm_pam-krb5.tgz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Configuration and log files for the pam_winbind authentication.
** Attachment added: lightdm_pam-winbind.tgz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/856269/+attachment/2439843/+files/lightdm_pam-winbind.tgz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Attached requested log files.
They refer to a first login as the domain user 'ambiente' (at 17:05:14), which
has password not in expiration period; and to a subsequent login as the domain
user 'rbag', which has password in expiration period (first password entered at
17:07:09, second password
Public bug reported:
I'm using an up-to-date oneiric workstation joined through samba and winbind to
an AD domain controlled by a Windows server.
Login as domain users is possible without problems in normal conditions, using
a pam configuration like this in /etc/pam/common-auth:
auth
I'm using, since ubuntu 8.04, samba and winbind to integrate a workstation into
an AD domain, as described here:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ActiveDirectoryWinbindHowto
I'm able to use gdm, and now lightdm, to login as a domain user, by
authenticating with pam_winbind or pam_krb5.
The
** Attachment added: pam-samba_configurations.tgz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/850298/+attachment/2404247/+files/pam-samba_configurations.tgz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in
29 matches
Mail list logo