Bug report did not expire due to bug watch
Upstream issue was closed "RESOLVED NOTGNOME" on 2017-10-31
No reply to comment #10 after almost four years so closing
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
is anyone still having the issue in bionic and test if using cp/gio copy
command give a different behaviour?
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in
this is apparently also a problem in Bionic-Beaver. I started a file
copy 7,633 files to a new USB stick (SSD to USB 3.1). The copy started
out like I expected, at a displayed rate of about 345MB/s. By the time,
it reached roughly 1/2 the copy began to slow and before long, it was
down to about
Comment # 4 on bug 789647 from Ondrej Holy from bugzilla.gnome.org:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789647
"Thanks for your reply. If "cp" is also so slow, then the bug is not in GNOME
layer. It is probably something wrong in kernel..."
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #789647
1) Values from the sysctl file:
/.../
vm.admin_reserve_kbytes = 8192
vm.block_dump = 0
vm.compact_unevictable_allowed = 1
vm.dirty_background_bytes = 0
vm.dirty_background_ratio = 10
vm.dirty_bytes = 0
vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 3000
vm.dirty_ratio = 20
vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 500
Some more info:
$ cat /proc/vmstat | egrep "dirty|writeback"
nr_dirty 0
nr_writeback 0
nr_writeback_temp 0
nr_dirty_threshold 0
nr_dirty_background_threshold 0
Each "0" ... Is that OK? (Original values!)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
The previously "dirty" values are original. Are these values normal?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728053
Title:
Copy to USB is very slow
Status in nautilus
Note: Previously there were no such anomalies at 16.04... After many updates
and patches to the LTS version come in, I'm not sure what to do with the
phenomenon.
But it is a fact that several weeks exist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
Typically, e.g. Select a file (desktop) > drag and drop copying / moving >
target USB flash drive / external USB hard disk
I do not typically use a command line
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
thank you for your bug report, is it better if you copy from another
filemanager or from a commandline?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728053
Title:
Copy to USB is
dirty_background_bytes: 0
dirty_background_ratio: 10
dirty_bytes: 0
dirty_ratio: 20
dirtytime_expire_seconds: 43200
dirty_expire_centisecs: 3000
dirty_writeback_centisecs: 500
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728053
Title:
Copy to USB is very slow
Status in nautilus package
12 matches
Mail list logo