Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

2021-01-17 Thread Eya Badal
Thank you very much, will do. I do have some follow up questions: 1-Is there any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer? 2-Regarding the OpenCypher licensing, it is based on Apache License and we believe it shouldn't be an issue to include it. Could you please advise? Thank you in

Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

2021-01-17 Thread Felix Cheung
Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and content. From: Eya Badal Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 6:30:04 PM To: dev@age.apache.org Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate

Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

2021-01-17 Thread Eya Badal
Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback. >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list and ask >everyone to vote? On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung wrote: > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be > just the mentor.