-0
- URL of the article is invalid.
https://github.com/apache/age/releases/tag/PG12/v.1.1.0-rc0
- Copyright's date looks weird.
e.g.,
/v1.1.0-rc0/tools/PerfectHash.pm
Line 4: Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2010,
Line 46: # Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2019, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
On
Looks good.
+1
On 2022/03/12 19:29:15 Nicholas Sorrell wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> We would like to discuss the Apache AGE release 1.0.0 that we have been
> working towards.
>
> To learn more about Apache AGE, please see https://age.apache.org/
>
> Functionality included and
Thanks for the reviews and the votes for Apache AGE Viewer 1.0.0 RC2.
Hopefully we will get some binding votes in the next round of voting.
7 +1 Non Bindings
Andrew Ko
Joe Fagan
Eya Badal
Josh Innis
VUONG QUOC Viet
John Gemignani
Nicholas Sorrell
Thank you.
Alex
Thanks for the reviews and the votes for Apache AGE Viewer 1.0.0 RC2.
Hopefully we will get some binding votes in the next round of voting.
7 +1 Non Bindings Andrew Ko Joe Fagan Eya Badal Josh Innis VUONG QUOC
Viet John Gemignani Nicholas Sorrell Thank you. Alex
Thanks. I will now close this vote and results will be sent shortly.
Best regards,
Alex
On 2022/02/26 03:57:26 Alex Kwak wrote:
> Dear Apache AGE Community,
>
> This is an official vote for the Apache AGE Viewer v1.0.0-rc2 that we have
> been working toward.
>
> To learn
Yes, It needs.
I agree.
Alex
On 2022/03/02 20:58:28 Josh Innis wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> For every release of AGE we update the version number. The team is
> currently researching how to support upgrading between versions and an
> issue about the order of updating the version in Master came to our
>
-viewer/releases/tag/v1.0.0-rc2
Best regards,
Alex Kwak
for the confusion caused and to those who have already casted their
vote.
On 2022/02/07 08:33:11 Alex Kwak wrote:
> Dear Apache AGE Community,
>
> This is an official vote for the Apache AGE Viewer release v1.0.0-rc2 that we
> have been working toward it.
>
> To learn more about
://downloads.apache.org/incubator/age/KEYS
The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
0E7F 408D 8C6A 1952 329C B379 D471 FDCE 5F5C 5B82
For more information about the contents of this release, see:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/releases/tag/v1.0.0-rc2
Best regards,
Alex Kwak
I am closing this vote due to incorrect info and will reopen it again soon
On 2022/02/07 08:33:11 Alex Kwak wrote:
> Dear Apache AGE Community,
>
> This is an official vote for the Apache AGE Viewer release v1.0.0-rc2 that we
> have been working toward it.
>
> To learn mor
Best regards,
Alex Kwak
o AgensGraph
> > ./frontend/src/components/frame/presentations/ServerDisconnectFrame.jsx:32:
> > disconnectToAgensGraph,
> > ```
> >
> >
> > Please keep in mind Apache AGE totally has nothing to do with AgensGraph
> > or bitnine business currently and in the fu
Option1 +1
In terms of OpenCypher's grammar compatibility, Option2 seems to be a very good
choice. However, in the case of a joint project, not a solo project, this
choice may cause confusion.
So, in a different opinion, how about introducing GUC, Option1 as the default
and choose between
+1
On 2022/01/18 23:37:59 Dehowe Feng wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have been
> working toward it.
>
> To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
>
> Functionalities included and addressed in this
ature and hash - check.
> - DISCLAIMER - check.
> - LICENSE and NOTICE - check.
> - No unexpected binary files - check.
> - incubating in name - check.
>
> Best,
> Eya
>
> On 2021/12/23 00:58:26 Alex Kwak wrote:
> > Dear Apache AGE Community,
> >
> > This is an
Sorry, All.
It was a mistake to close it. We will continue voting.
On 2022/01/10 02:37:21 Alex Kwak wrote:
> Hello Community,
>
> We are closing the vote. Results will be sent shortly.
>
> On 2022/01/06 02:20:46 Alex Kwak wrote:
> > Dear Apache AGE Community,
> >
&
I want a committer to be a person who not only care his own work, but also to
other people's work.
So that each other can develop further and go in a good direction.
On 2022/01/06 20:14:31 Eya Badal wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As recommended by our mentors I would like to get community
Hello Community,
We are closing the vote. Results will be sent shortly.
On 2022/01/06 02:20:46 Alex Kwak wrote:
> Dear Apache AGE Community,
>
> This is an official vote for the Apache AGE Viewer release v1.0.0-rc1 that we
> have been working toward it.
>
> To learn mor
://downloads.apache.org/incubator/age/KEYS
The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
0E7F 408D 8C6A 1952 329C B379 D471 FDCE 5F5C 5B82
For more information about the contents of this release, see:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/releases/tag/v1.0.0-rc1
Best regards,
Alex Kwak
://downloads.apache.org/incubator/age/KEYS
The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
0E7F 408D 8C6A 1952 329C B379 D471 FDCE 5F5C 5B82
For more information about the contents of this release, see:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/releases/tag/v1.0.0
Best regards,
Alex Kwak
We now close this thread as there has been no objections and move will forward
to the
[VOTE] thread.
Thank you,
Alex Kwak
On 2021/12/17 02:30:47 Alex Kwak wrote:
> Dear Apache AGE Community,
> We would like to discuss the Apache AGE Viewer release v1.0.0-rc0 that we
> have been worki
The thread is open for 72 hours and please let us know if you have any
questions.
Best regards,
Alex Kwak
+1
On 2021/11/09 04:31:33 Eya Badal wrote:
> Hi AGE community and Mentors,
>
> Since entering incubation 18 months ago in April 2020 and with five
> versions of AGE released, and 0.6.0 imminent, it's fair to say the AGE
> community has demonstrated its ability to build software releases the
>
+1
On 2021/11/21 21:33:41 Josh Innis wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version 0.6.0.
>
> This release includes the updates to the NOTICE, removing the WIP disclaimer
> and adding the standard disclaimer, and changing the
+1 VLE feature looks good to me.
On 2021/11/19 00:24:13 John Gemignani wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Signature and hash fine
> DISCLAIMER is fine
> LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
> No unexpected binary files
> incubating in name
>
>
> john
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 3:37 PM Andrew Ko wrote:
>
> >
25 matches
Mail list logo
