Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 26, 2024

+ 1 (non-binding) Tested my changes. looks good! Thanks Pankaj On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 1:21 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > cncf.kubernetes provider will be excluded from this release. > Please continue voting for all other providers > > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 7:42 AM Amogh Desai > wrote: > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 01, 2024

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 6:03 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > I will exclude pinecone from this release. > Please continue voting excluding pinecone provider > > On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 3:19 PM Ankit Chaurasia > wrote: > > > -1 non-binding for Pinecone: 2.0.0rc1 > > > > There is an issue

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 16, 2024

+1 (non-binding) tested my changes. Thanks Pankaj On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 12:24 PM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding > > Tested few example DAGs with cncf. Works fine. > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 at 12:21 PM, Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding)

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wei Lee

Congrats Wei, very well deserved! On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 2:33 PM Rahul Vats wrote: > Congrats Wei, very well deserved! > > Regards, > Rahul Vats > > > On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 14:27, Amogh Desai wrote: > > > Many congratulations, Wei! > > > > Welcome onboard! > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Amogh

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on March 04, 2024

+1 (non-binding) Tested my changes and a few more Dags. Thanks Pankaj On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 11:18 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding > > Verified some dags, mostly around cncf providers. Looks good  > > On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 11:13 AM, Rahul Vats wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding). > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 19, 2024

+1 (non-binding) Tested my changes. looking good. Thanks for the RC's and testing it. On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:01 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested my latest PR in RC3 fixing task to be failed when pod times out > to start https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37514 and

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 12, 2024

) for other providers Thanks you Pankaj On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 2:38 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > -1 (non-binding) only for cncf.kubernetes: 8.0.0rc1 and common.sql: > 1.11.0rc2. > > 1. cncf.kubernetes: Pankaj Singh (@pankajastro) is actively working on > resolving bugs reported in the resolu

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 30, 2024

+1 (non-binding) Ran some dags and it worked fine! On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:55 AM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested my changes with our example DAG without encountering error > > Best, > Wei > > > On Jan 31, 2024, at 6:34 AM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) - checked

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

+1 (non-binding). ran some tests for amazon,google,ftp,snowflake,databricks,openlineage,mysql providers. On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 4:17 AM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) checked binary reproduction, licences, signatures, and > checksums. > > On my system the binary reproduction check for

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Andrey Anshin (taragolis)

Congrats Andrey  On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:30 AM Aritra Basu wrote: > Congrats Andrey!! > > -- > Regards, > Aritra Basu > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024, 12:24 AM Vincent Beck wrote: > > > Congrats Andrey! > > > > On 2024/01/15 18:46:32 ambika garg wrote: > > > Congrats Andrey!! > > > > > > On Mon,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 07, 2024

+1 (non binding) On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 11:19 PM Vincent Beck wrote: > +1 non binding. All AWS system tests are running successfully against > apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.16.0rc1. You can see the results here: >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 31, 2023

+1 (non binding) On Mon, Jan 1, 2024 at 8:29 AM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Best, > Wei > > > On Jan 1, 2024, at 1:09 AM, Amogh Desai > wrote: > > > > +1 non binding > > > > Tested if the RC is fine with other providers. Things look good  > > > > On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 at 10:01 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 28, 2023

+ 1 (non-binding) On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 2:24 PM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) for providers other than Weavaite > > Tested our example DAGs with the following providers without encountering > issues > > apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.15.0rc1 >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 23, 2023

+1 non binding On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 9:53 AM Phani Kumar wrote: > +1 non binding > > On Sun, 24 Dec 2023, 09:16 utkarsh sharma, wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Tested my changes in apache-airflow-providers-weaviate==1.2.0rc1 > > > > Thanks, > > Utkarsh Sharma > > > > On Sat, Dec 23,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 12, 2023

> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36202 for fixing the google > >> issue > >> > > > >> > > Best, > >> > > Wei > >> > > > >> > > Jarek Potiuk 於 2023年12月13日 週三 下午6:34寫道： > >> > > >

Re: Making Listeners API non-experimental

+1. Considering stability, it's a good time to remove the experimental tag now. On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 4:33 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 > > > Best regards, > > *Pankaj Koti* > Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team) > Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India > Timezone: Indian

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 12, 2023

-1 (non-binding) for google and databricks providers since bug a has been found. On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 3:45 PM Utkarsh Sharma wrote: > -1 (non-binding) > > I looked into Databricks providers and the PR > introduced breaking changes > I have added

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 08, 2023

-1 (non-binding) for Google provider because a bug have been found that need a fix see https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34919#issuecomment-1846993082 +1 (non-binding) for other providers. On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 9:04 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > Checked signatures, checksums, licences,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Utkarsh Sharma

Congratulations Utkarsh  On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:45 PM Aritra Basu wrote: > Amazing Utkarsh, congratulations! > > -- > Regards, > Aritra Basu > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023, 10:27 PM Phani Kumar .invalid> > wrote: > > > Congratulations Utkarsh ! Well deserved > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:13 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Jens Scheffler

Congrats Jens!  On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 2:29 PM Bas Harenslak wrote: > Congratulations Jens! Well deserved! > > > On 8 Nov 2023, at 09:57, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > > > > ✨✨徭 > > > > On 8 November 2023 08:41:42 GMT, Pierre Jeambrun > wrote: > >> Congrats Jens! > >> > >> Le mer. 8 nov. 2023 à

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.3 from 2.7.3rc1

+1 (non-binding) my changes look good to me. On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 10:11 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (binding) I checked the checksums, the signatures, the licences, the > sources, and I tested all my changes. > I also ran some testing dags, and all looks good. >

Re: [VOTE] Add providers for Pinecone, OpenAI & Cohere to enable first-class LLMOps

+1 (binding) On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:52 PM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:41 PM Phani Kumar > wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023, 16:39 utkarsh sharma, > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Utkarsh Sharma > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 13, 2023

+ 1 (non-binding) On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 6:59 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding). Tested licences, signatures, checksums, source code. > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 2:27 PM Amogh Desai > wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > Tested out some DAGs, things seem ok > > > > Thanks & Regards, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.7.2 from 2.7.2rc1

+1 (non binding) On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 1:20 PM Aritra Basu wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > > -- > Regards, > Aritra Basu > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2023, 9:27 AM Phani Kumar .invalid> > wrote: > > > +1 non binding > > > > On Sun, 15 Oct 2023, 03:29 Hussein Awala, wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Pankaj Koti and Amogh Desai as committers

Congrats Pankaj and Amogh!! On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 8:46 PM Rahul Vats wrote: > Congratulations Pankaj and Amogh. > > On Tue, 19 Sep, 2023, 20:22 Hussein Awala, wrote: > > > Congrats Pankaj and Amogh! > > > > Hussein > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:45 PM Andrey Anshin > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 12, 2023

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 7:23 PM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested some example dags with DBT without encountering the issue. > > Best, > Wei > > > On Sep 13, 2023, at 9:49 PM, Phani Kumar > wrote: > > > > +1 non binding > > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:03 PM Amogh

Re: [VOTE] Drop MsSQL as supported backend

+1 (binding) On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 8:45 PM Vikram Koka wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 8:09 AM Josh Fell .invalid> > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 8:35 AM Ankit Chaurasia > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > *Ankit Chaurasia* > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 29, 2023

+ 1 (non-binding) My changes look good. Thanks Pankaj On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 8:25 AM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 non-binding > > Tested with #33716 , #33467 > , #33433 < >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 26, 2023

microsoft.azure - due to Ephraim note. > > > cncf.kubernetes - due to a bug discovered with istio which was fixed in > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33779 > > > > > > Both providers will have RC2. > > > > > > Kindly asking (-1) vot

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 26, 2023

-1 (non-binding) As mentioned by Ephraim, we need a new RC for microsoft azure provider other providers looks good. On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 9:34 PM Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > Tested my change https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33457 in Azure and > it broke the connection. I was previously

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.0 from 2.7.0rc2

+1 (non-binding) Ran astro-sdk tests and tested my changes. On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:23 PM Ferruzzi, Dennis wrote: > Looks like the AWS provider package is happy and overall CI is happy. > > +1 non-binding > > > - ferruzzi > > > > From: Utkarsh Sharma >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Hussein Awala

Congrats Hussein  On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 12:14 PM Ankit Chaurasia wrote: > Congratulations > > On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 at 11:43, Phani Kumar .invalid> > wrote: > > > Congrats Hussein > > > > On Sun, 30 Jul 2023, 10:49 Elad Kalif, wrote: > > > > > Congrats! well deserved! > > > > > > On Sun, Jul

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.3 from 2.6.3rc1

+ 1 (non-binding) ran some example dags and checked some UI behaviour in the airflow docker rc image. On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 4:03 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Used this RC to start Airflow with breeze and ran a few example DAGs. > > Regards, > > > > Pankaj Koti > > *Senior

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 09, 2023

+1 (non-binding) tested my changes On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:47 PM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested without example amazon DAGs without encountering issues. > > Best, > Wei > > > > On Jul 10, 2023, at 3:13 PM, Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Our Amazon

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Dennis Ferruzzi

congratulations! On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 11:34 PM Ferruzzi, Dennis wrote: > Thanks everyone! > > > conngraatullationss!! > > *chef-kiss* > > > - ferruzzi > > > > From: Akash Sharma <2akash111...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2023 10:31 AM > To:

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committers: Vincent Beck, Phani Kumar, Maciej Obuchowski

Congratulations! On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:53 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > Wow! Congrats!! > > > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023, 11:48 Pankaj Koti .invalid> > wrote: > > > Amazing news at the start of the day! > > > > Very well deserved all of them, Vincent, Phani and Maciej!! > > Congratulations! Keep

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 20, 2023

+1 (non binding) Tested my changes. On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:06 PM Phani Kumar wrote: > +1 non binding > > Tested #30279 , #31685 > , #31081 > ,#31317 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.2 from 2.6.2rc2

+1 (non-binding) Tested my changes around CLI/REST-API/KE looks good. Thank you Pankaj On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:11 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) licences, checksums, signatures, sources are matching the tag > from repo. Run a few dags, all looks good. Added Also the check that PMC >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 24, 2023

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:10 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding): tested signatures, checksums, licences, tested that > min-airflow works as intended (cycles are no problem, pip doesn't install > the pre-installed versions of providers on airflow < 2.4) > > On Fri, May 26,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 19, 2023

+1 (non-binding) Tested my changes On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 4:12 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding): All my status from rc1 still holds. Checked signatures, > checksums, licences. > > I thoroughly checked the circular settings import problem which caused rc1 > cancelling (all the providers

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.6.1 from 2.6.1rc1

+ 1 (non-binding) verify the newly generated pool model. Yes, as mentioned by Pierre Jeambrun there is apache-airflow-client-2.6.0-source archive inside 2.6.1 source. It would be great if we can clean it. On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 4:17 AM Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > +1 (binding), same. > > I don't

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.1 from 2.6.1rc3

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 11:49 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I tested our example DAGs for asynchronous providers kept in > astronomer-providers on this RC3, verified that the version works well and > does not have a regression on our suite. > > Regards, > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.6.0 from 2.6.0rc2

+1 (no-binding) ran some examples, looks good. though, the pypi link in the email doesn't look correct. > Airflow Client 2.6.0rc2 is available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/clients/python/$\{VERSION\}/ > Or also available at PyPI: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.0 from 2.6.0rc5

+1 (non-binding) On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 9:57 AM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked signatures, checksums, licences. Used it with the helm chart with a > few different configs >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.0 from 2.6.0rc4

+1 (non-binding) On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 8:51 AM Phani Kumar wrote: > +1 non-binding > > On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 7:43 AM Luciano Resende > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 4:00 AM Ephraim Anierobi < > > ephraimanier...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hey fellow

Re: [VOTE] April 2023 PR of the Month

+1 for #30705 as it has reduced CI execution drastically. On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 6:47 PM Hemkumar Chheda wrote: > My vote goes to #30375 to fix the annoying issues of task gets stucked in > queued state for longer duration while working with celery executor. > > On 2023/04/25 21:08:46 Michael

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 26, 2023

+1 (non-binding) Tested my changes. On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 5:33 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding). Tested signatures, licences, checksums, the requirements for > aiobotocore are fixed now. > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:52 AM Elad Kalif wrote: > > > Hey all,I have just cut the ad hoc

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 25, 2023

-1 (non-binding) We won't be able to use the amazon provider for airflow version less than equal to 2.5.3 because conflict cause by aibotocore ERROR: Cannot install aiobotocore[boto3]==2.2.0, aiobotocore[boto3]==2.3.0, aiobotocore[boto3]==2.3.1, aiobotocore[boto3]==2.3.2,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 21, 2023

+1 non binding our astronomer-providers and astro-sdk DAG'S ran fine on the RC's. On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 6:02 PM Phani Kumar wrote: > +1 non binding > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 2:25 PM Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > +1 non-binding > > > > We tested the following 7 RCs on our example DAGs. > > 1.

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 09, 2023

+1 non-binding On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 7:34 PM Phani Kumar wrote: > +1 non-binding - tested amazon RC and it works well > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 6:32 PM Utkarsh Sharma > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Utkarsh Sharma > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 4:56 AM Hussein Awala

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 02, 2023

+1 non binding On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 10:19 AM Rajath Srinivasaiah wrote: > +1 non binding > > Thanks and Regards, > Rajath S > rajath.srinivasa...@astronomer.io > > [image: image.png] > > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 10:00 AM Phani Kumar > wrote: > >> +1 non binding.Tested the azure rc and found

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.3 from 2.5.3rc2

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 8:13 AM Josh Fell wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 1:18 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > > > +1 binding > > tested some of my demo dags. looks good. > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 7:31 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) - checked

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.2 from 2.5.2rc2

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 5:29 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > From: Josh Fell > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 12:56:02 AM > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.2 from 2.5.2rc2 > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.2 from 2.5.2rc1

+1 (non-binding). Our DAG ran fine against this RC. On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 8:50 AM Josh Fell wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 4:43 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 13:31, Hussein Awala wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) tested all my

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Unsubscribe links in users@ mailing list footers

+1 On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 10:07 PM Sumit Maheshwari wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 8:37 PM Beck, Vincent > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> >> *From: *Elad Kalif >> *Reply-To: *"dev@airflow.apache.org" >> *Date: *Friday, March 3, 2023 at 9:50 AM >> *To: *"dev@airflow.apache.org" >> *Subject:

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on March 03, 2023

+1 (non-binding) - Tested my changes related to google and amazon providers. On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 7:43 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) - tested my changes, checked signatures, checksums, > licences. All looks good. > > On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 3:33 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > > > > Hey all, >

Re: [VOTE] February PR of the Month

+1 for #27758 On Sun, Feb 26, 2023, 07:19 wrote: > +1 for 27758 > > On Feb 25, 2023, at 7:53 PM, Collin McNulty > wrote: > >  > I’ll add my voice to the 27758 chorus. +1 > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 6:09 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > >> +1 to #27758 too! >> -- >>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 18, 2023

+1 non-binding On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 8:57 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > +1 binding > > On Feb 21 2023, at 3:06 pm, Josh Fell > wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 5:39 AM Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > +1 non-binding. Concurring with Rajath's tests. > > Regards, > > > > Pankaj

Re: [Discussion] Set further policies for triaging issues

Hi Elad, Thanks for bringing this topic. I also feel we should have some automation to close the stale issue. Few questions I have - We have currently more than 700 issues and many of them have had no activity since a year. What will we do with those issues? - Why close only stale issues not

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 08, 2023

+1 non-binding We tested our *astro-sdk *and astronomer-providers tests on rc's. On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 7:18 PM Rajath Srinivasaiah wrote: > +1 non-binding > > Thanks and Regards, > Rajath S >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.1 from 2.5.1rc2

+1 (non-binding) Run units, integrations and example DAG's of our astro-sdk-python with 2.5.1rc2 package. On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 9:41 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) tested few dags, signature, checksums, licences - looks good. > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 11:01 PM Pierre Jeambrun >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 14, 2023

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 6:12 PM Rajath Srinivasaiah wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Our example DAGs ran fine. > > > Thanks and Regards, > Rajath S > rajath.srinivasa...@astronomer.io > > [image: image.png] > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 5:51 PM Pankaj Koti > wrote: > >> +1

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 02, 2023 - RC2

+1 (non-binding) Tested google provider rc for my changes. On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 5:32 PM Rajath Srinivasaiah wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested the following RCs against our DAGs: > > apache-airflow-providers-ftp==3.3.0rc2 > apache-airflow-providers-sftp==4.2.1rc2 > > > Thanks and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer Niko Oliveira (o-nikolas)

Congratulations Niko! On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 5:50 AM Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > Congratulations Niko! > > Pierre > > On Tue 20 Dec 2022 at 00:21, Ping Zhang wrote: > >> Congrats Niko  >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ping >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 3:18 PM Xiaodong Deng wrote: >> >>> Congrats! >>>

Re: [VOTE] AIP-51 - Removing Executor Coupling from Core Airlfow

+1 non-binding I love how easy it is for me to plug my own requirement in Airflow without touching the core Airflow. This would definitely be a great improvement. On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 3:54 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > +1 binding > This would be a great improvement! > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on November 15, 2022

+1 non-binding Tested my changes related to amazon and google provider worked as expected. On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 7:03 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Would love some votes - we have a follow up release after a few small > providers docs/fixes, so would be great to release it before tomorrow > and

Re: [Discussion] Airflow Newsletter name and branding

+1 for Atmosphere On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:29 PM Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > Atmosphere +1! > > T. > -- Pankaj Singh Software Engineer, Astronomer Inc | https://www.linkedin.com/in/pankajiam/

Re: Unable to migrate from 2.2.5 to 2.3.1 - airflow db upgrade error

Issue was fixed after upgrading alembic from version 1.5.8 to 1.8.1 On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 9:29 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > See issue. Not much help with your problem though. > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 7:42 AM Pankaj Singh wrote: > > > > > > Issue: https://github.com/

Unable to migrate from 2.2.5 to 2.3.1 - airflow db upgrade error

Documents/workspace/airflow-plugins/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/alembic/script/revision.py", line 1040, in _iterate_revisions total_space.remove(rev.revision) KeyError: '75d5ed6c2b43' Can someone help here? -- Thanks and Regards, Pankaj Singh

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on 2022-09-05

+1 non-binding Tested my changes related to Amazon provider. On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 4:15 PM Phani Kumar wrote: > +1 non-binding. > Tested that the RC amazon provider contains the new > operator(EmrEksCreateClusterOperator) and is running fine. > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 4:00 PM Ash

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 10, 2022 (rc3)

Tested my changes for AWS provider. +1 (non binding) On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 12:11 AM Phani Kumar wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 10:35 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> We need one more vote :) >> >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 2:33 PM Ephraim Anierobi < >>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 13, 2022

Tested my changes working fine. +1 (non-binding) On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 4:57 AM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked signatures, checksums, and licences. >

Re: Please vote on the PR of the Month for this month's Airflow Newsletter!

+1 for #24284 On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 1:13 PM Tobiasz Kędzierski < tobiaszkedzier...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for #24249 >

Re: [VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow

this AIP, the proposal describes >>>>>>>>>> implementing how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, >>>>>>>>>> traces, and >>>>>>>>>> logs in a common open specification called OpenTelemetry (