Re: apr_dbd_freetds

2013-03-07 Thread Nick Kew
On 22 Aug 2012, at 18:18, Nick Kew wrote: Is anyone in a position to take up the baton on FreeTDS? If not, perhaps it's time we dropped that driver in favour of the ODBC one. In addition to this thread, I recently raised this on the PMC list. I'm now proposing to turn talk into action.

Re: apr_dbd_freetds

2013-03-07 Thread Graham Leggett
On 07 Mar 2013, at 6:50 PM, Nick Kew n...@apache.org wrote: Is anyone in a position to take up the baton on FreeTDS? If not, perhaps it's time we dropped that driver in favour of the ODBC one. In addition to this thread, I recently raised this on the PMC list. I'm now proposing to turn

Re: apr_dbd_freetds

2013-03-07 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:56:38 +0200 Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: There is a workable alternative driver for end users in the form of the ODBC driver (to my understanding), so removing it doesn't leave end users in the lurch. Can we make sure the removal is documented, and people

Re: apr_dbd_freetds

2012-09-07 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Wednesday 22 August 2012, Graham Leggett wrote: On 22 Aug 2012, at 7:18 PM, Nick Kew wrote: PR 53666 tells us apr_dbd_freetds doesn't work with Sybase, and very probably never did. The reporter attaches a patch, but it's one I'm not happy with, even if I had access to any FreeTDS

apr_dbd_freetds

2012-08-22 Thread Nick Kew
PR 53666 tells us apr_dbd_freetds doesn't work with Sybase, and very probably never did. The reporter attaches a patch, but it's one I'm not happy with, even if I had access to any FreeTDS backend to test-drive (which I don't). The basic objection is that FreeTDS doesn't support prepared

Re: apr_dbd_freetds

2012-08-22 Thread Graham Leggett
On 22 Aug 2012, at 7:18 PM, Nick Kew wrote: PR 53666 tells us apr_dbd_freetds doesn't work with Sybase, and very probably never did. The reporter attaches a patch, but it's one I'm not happy with, even if I had access to any FreeTDS backend to test-drive (which I don't). The basic