On 09.06.2017 15:07, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any
> final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release.
> Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates.
>
> +/- votes please
> [ ] Release apr-util 1.6.0
+1
On 09.06.2017 15:09, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed,
> and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual
> http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate.
>
> +/- votes please
> [ ] Release apr 1.6.2
+1
OS X
On 6/9/2017 6:09 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed,
and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate.
+/- votes please
[ ] Release apr 1.6.2
[+1] Release apr
William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.apr.devel (Fri, 9 Jun 2017
08:09:00 -0500):
> [+1] Release apr 1.6.2
FWIW: +1 Windows VC14 (CMake)
--
Jan
William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.apr.devel (Fri, 9 Jun 2017
08:07:17 -0500):
> [x] Release apr-util 1.6.0
FWIW: +1 Windows V14 (CMake)
--
Jan
+1 AIX/xlc/ppc64
longstanding failure in apr_sockaddr_is_wildcard() only
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +1
>> On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:09 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>>
>> With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are
+1 AIX/xlc/ppc64
Longstanding mystery testxlate crash, no regression.
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +1.
>> On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:07 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>>
>> As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any
On 08.06.2017 19:22, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> How can I help?
The average developer will have access to 32- or 64-bit
Intel-architecture Linux variants. A few will bother to test on one of
the *BSD flavours. Some of us have laptops running macOS. Windows
development environments are widely
+1
> On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:09 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed,
> and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual
> http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate.
>
> +/- votes please
> [ ]
+1.
> On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:07 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any
> final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release.
> Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates.
>
> +/- votes please
On 09/06/2017 23:09, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed,
> and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual
> http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate.
>
> +/- votes please
> [ ] Release apr 1.6.2
+1 Slackware
--
On 10/06/2017 08:50, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:07:17 -0500
> William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
>> As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any
>> final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release.
>> Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
12 matches
Mail list logo