Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

2017-06-10 Thread Branko Čibej
On 09.06.2017 15:07, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any > final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release. > Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates. > > +/- votes please > [ ] Release apr-util 1.6.0 +1

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

2017-06-10 Thread Branko Čibej
On 09.06.2017 15:09, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed, > and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual > http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate. > > +/- votes please > [ ] Release apr 1.6.2 +1 OS X

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

2017-06-10 Thread Gregg Smith
On 6/9/2017 6:09 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed, and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate. +/- votes please [ ] Release apr 1.6.2 [+1] Release apr

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

2017-06-10 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.apr.devel (Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:09:00 -0500): > [+1] Release apr 1.6.2 FWIW: +1 Windows VC14 (CMake) -- Jan

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

2017-06-10 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.apr.devel (Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:07:17 -0500): > [x] Release apr-util 1.6.0 FWIW: +1 Windows V14 (CMake) -- Jan

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

2017-06-10 Thread Eric Covener
+1 AIX/xlc/ppc64 longstanding failure in apr_sockaddr_is_wildcard() only On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > +1 >> On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:09 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

2017-06-10 Thread Eric Covener
+1 AIX/xlc/ppc64 Longstanding mystery testxlate crash, no regression. On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > +1. >> On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:07 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-1.6.1 and APR-UTIL 1.6.0

2017-06-10 Thread Branko Čibej
On 08.06.2017 19:22, Dennis Clarke wrote: > How can I help? The average developer will have access to 32- or 64-bit Intel-architecture Linux variants. A few will bother to test on one of the *BSD flavours. Some of us have laptops running macOS. Windows development environments are widely

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

2017-06-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 > On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:09 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed, > and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual > http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate. > > +/- votes please > [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

2017-06-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1. > On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:07 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any > final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release. > Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates. > > +/- votes please

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

2017-06-10 Thread Noel Butler
On 09/06/2017 23:09, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed, > and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual > http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate. > > +/- votes please > [ ] Release apr 1.6.2 +1 Slackware --

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

2017-06-10 Thread Noel Butler
On 10/06/2017 08:50, Nick Kew wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:07:17 -0500 > William A Rowe Jr wrote: > >> As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any >> final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release. >> Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/