PR 38793 (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38793#c3)
revealed that apr_reslist_release does not notice double releases of the same
resource.
After looking at the code of apr_reslist.c I am currently undecided if this is
a bug or a feature. If it is a bug it should be fixed of
On 03/07/2006 12:34 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Monday 06 March 2006 22:37, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
How does a resource get released more than once? Are we talking about
logic equivalent to a double-free, or something more subtle?
Yes, it is a simple double-free problem. Just do
On 04/25/2006 04:58 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Bojan, if you're merging a revision from trunk to a branch (or
vice-versa for that matter) please mention that in the commit log, so
people know that's what's happening. If you don't mention that it's a
I think
On 06/24/2006 08:48 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
APR is now used by a half dozen successful open source projects and many
many more other development efforts.
Is there a reason for apr issues to continue to go to httpd.apache.org?
That is, is it time for a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list?
Hi,
we need a new mailing list called
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to collect the bugzilla mails for apr. Currently apr bugs are sent to
bugs@httpd.apache.org, but we want to split this.
Regards
Rüdiger
Sander Temme wrote:
On Jun 24, 2006, at 8:48 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Is there a reason for apr issues to continue to go to httpd.apache.org?
That is, is it time for a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list?
+1, I'll be happy to set that up from the Bugzilla end tomorrow at the
Hackathon.
On 01.07.2006 11:03, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
If we remove the patent-encumbered code from OpenSSL, then it isn't
OpenSSL and we cannot distribute it or anything built from it under
I think we do not really *remove* this code, but just compile OpenSSL *without*
this code (via configure
On 07/20/2006 05:45 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
APACHE PORTABLE RUNTIME (APR) LIBRARY STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-07-19 06:20:22 -0400 (Wed, 19 Jul 2006) $]
Releases:
Standalone
1.3.0 : in development
1.2.2 : released October
On 07/29/2006 07:04 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Personally, I'm -1 on us adding support for any non-registered port
types in APR-Util's URL parser. Perhaps someone in the Tomcat
community can get in touch with the IANA and do the appropriate
begging and pleading for this port to be assigned
Reposting what I sent to Mladen in private. Just missed that
his address was in to and not dev@apr.apache.org :-)
Original Message
Subject: Re: How to detect is the socket is still open
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:57:36 +0200
From: Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mladen Turk
On 08/03/2006 02:47 AM, Gonzalo Paniagua Javier wrote:
What does poll (with timeout zero) return in the case that the socket
has been closed?
It reports that the socket is readable.
And when you read it, it returns EOF?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 08/07/2006 01:19 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 12:34:25AM -, Paul Querna wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Fri Aug 4 17:34:25 2006
New Revision: 428931
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=428931view=rev
Log:
Add memcache multi-get support to apr_memcache.
+
On 08/07/2006 07:51 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 8/5/06, Paul Smedley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read the website on how to submit patches - submitted in bug report
40193
(Not aimed at you, but at whomever edited the contributing page on the
APR site.)
I think only submitting
On 08/11/2006 06:42 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
We've been fighting with some DSO/Pool related bugs in Subversion
lately, and have basically come to the conclusion that there's no good
solution, or at least no good solution that doesn't involve patching
APR itself.
The problem, in short, is
On 09/27/2006 10:38 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 9/27/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
So here's my question [...] to the project;
do we want to change the very nature of collecting individual
copyright
statements in NOTICE from all
Oops, wrong list.
Original Message
Subject: [Fwd: Re: apr_brigade_create() produces a corrupt brigade]
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:02:57 +0200
From: Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
On 10/26/2006 09:48 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
I have spent
On 11/29/2006 01:23 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four times,
just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
+1/-1 Release
[ ] apr-1.2.8
[ ] apr-util-1.2.8
[ ] apr-0.9.13
[
On 01/02/2007 11:01 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
However, the big annoying thing is that we declared apr_md5_ctx_t in
apr_md5.h so it's not an opaque value. Luckily for us though, OpenSSL's
MD5 context is smaller than APR's - so an ugly hack works.
OpenSSL's ctx:
#define
On 01/05/2007 02:20 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Joe Orton]
Yes, APR could detect system features at run-time, and yes, doing so
would be a complete maintenance nightmare having a small net negative
run-time cost to 99% of users, and no, it's not worth doing.
So in your opinion, which of
Sorry missed Joe's comment that test results should be posted to dev.
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-08 12:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=19375)
-- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19375action=view)
Backport to 1.2.8 based on r493791
Based
On 01/08/2007 09:38 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Sorry missed Joe's comment that test results should be posted to dev.
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-08 12:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=19375)
-- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id
On 01/12/2007 12:25 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:08:18AM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I noticed that the following situation does not work as expected:
- 64 bit Linux system (SuSE 10.1 in my case)
- 32 bit and 64 bit versions of libexpat installed with libexpat.la
On 01/15/2007 01:56 PM, Bart van der Schans wrote:
In r463496 the following check was added to mod_cache.c :
else if (exp != APR_DATE_BAD exp r-request_time)
{
/* if a Expires header is in the past, don't cache it */
reason = Expires header already expired, not
On 03/30/2007 07:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to lay these tags down and roll candidates this Saturday.
That said, I'm willing to be a tiny bit patient if someone needs all
of Saturday, even into Sunday, to squish a few more gnats.
apr-iconv in particular has quite a few
On 05/10/2007 10:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I found a problem with the build of apr-util-1.2.2 (
libapr-util1-1.2.2-13.2.src.rpm), when both expat-2.0.0-13.2.x86_64.rpm
and expat-32bit-2.0.0-13.2.x86_64.rpm are installed.
I am using SLES10 amd64 version, and building a amd64
The --prefix parameter (and possibly more paramters) is ignored by APR 0.9.x /
httpd 2.0.x when using autoconf 2.60. This is because r423435 [1] has not yet
been backported to 0.9.x. The backport to 1.2.x happened as r423826 [2].
r423435 applies cleanly to 0.9.x, so it would be great if someone
On 05/29/2007 11:02 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 12:58:24AM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
The --prefix parameter (and possibly more paramters) is ignored by APR 0.9.x /
httpd 2.0.x when using autoconf 2.60. This is because r423435 [1] has not yet
been backported to 0.9.x
On 06/06/2007 11:45 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm quite partial to your third solution, I trust from performance that
this is the greatest net efficiency (but per platform tests would be needed
to confirm this). This is worth dumping 1.2.9 and rerolling 1.2.10 IMHO
(along with
On 06/07/2007 12:10 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/06/2007 11:45 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm quite partial to your third solution, I trust from performance that
this is the greatest net efficiency (but per platform tests would be needed
to confirm
On 08/13/2007 07:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim's spearheaded an effort to release httpd-2.0.60 and we've
discovered a set of socket issues that need to be corrected by
apr-0.9.15.
How do we plan to address these? Like in 1.2.x by reverting the
backports (which seems to make sense to
On 08/13/2007 09:34 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 13, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/13/2007 07:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim's spearheaded an effort to release httpd-2.0.60 and we've
discovered a set of socket issues that need
On 08/15/2007 07:38 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/13/2007 09:34 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It's a nice idea in 1.3, but since it's causing issues, simply revert.
Done in r565517.
Wasn't the (*new)-remote_addr_unknown = 0
On 08/20/2007 05:46 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 20, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 8/19/07, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A thread in proc1 will get EDEADLK from fcntl() on the LDAP mutex
A potential for deadlock occurs if a process controlling a
On 08/15/2007 07:38 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm rolling today, although not quite first thing as I had planned. I've
spent my time since vacation fighting with Win32-foo, and want to make sure
the release is solid on Win32 as well as unix.
Sorry for being impatient, but any
On 08/20/2007 10:11 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Sorry for being impatient, but any update on the timetable?
I don't blame you, this has eaten many more hours than I expected.
It turns out there are all sorts of subtle side effects of the way
we are doing
On 08/30/2007 01:40 PM, Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
On 8/29/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four times,
just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
+1/-1 Release
[ ]
On 08/29/2007 03:12 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four times,
just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
[ +1 ] apr-1.2.10
[ +1 ] apr-util-1.2.9
[ +1 ] apr-0.9.15
[ +1 ]
On 08/31/2007 07:05 AM, josh rotenberg wrote:
On 8/30/07, Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PPS. Tests on apr-util-0.9.14 require a key press mid way through, after
this:
Yes 186124938900 Sun, 24 Dec 2028 05:43:09 GMT
Yes 5648237200 Sat, 16 Oct 1971 17:32:52 GMT
Yes
On 09/04/2007 03:38 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four times,
just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
[If you want to speed up the effort by comparing the packages,
I noticed that the versions 0.9.15 / 1.2.10 are missing in bugzilla in order
to open reports for the latest apr-util release. Can someone please add them?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 09/22/2007 08:11 PM, Agri wrote:
Hello
Compiling apr-1.2.11 with --disable-ipv6 resuts in unknown symbol
find_if_index in the libapr-1.so.0.2.11.
Agri
I guess the patch below should fix this, but I am not sure if this is the
correct thing to do
in the case that IPV6 is
On 09/28/2007 11:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Fri Sep 28 14:04:47 2007
New Revision: 580486
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=580486view=rev
Log:
Introduce APR_NO_FILE as an option for any of the three stdio streams
to cause the specified streams to be closed
On 09/29/2007 12:53 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/28/2007 11:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Fri Sep 28 14:04:47 2007
New Revision: 580486
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=580486view=rev
Log:
Introduce APR_NO_FILE as an option for any of the three stdio
On 10/05/2007 02:19 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Once APR is out, I'll plan on a httpd release too.
There are several backport proposals in the STATUS file
missing only one vote. So I guess it is voting time :-).
Regards
Rüdiger
On 10/13/2007 02:59 PM, Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
against trunk head.
make check (on Ubuntu 7.10)
All tests passed.
Commited as r584411. Thanks.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 10/14/2007 09:19 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
/bin/sh /local0/asf/build/apr-1.x/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -g
-O2 -pthread -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -I./include
-I/local0/asf/build/apr-1.x/include/arch/unix
On 10/14/2007 08:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Sat Oct 13 23:00:00 2007
New Revision: 584487
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=584487view=rev
Log:
Enhance our file_io in APR 1.3 with apr_file_pipe_create_ex(),
which should replace apr_file_pipe_create() in apr
On 10/14/2007 12:03 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 10/14/2007 08:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Sat Oct 13 23:00:00 2007
New Revision: 584487
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=584487view=rev
Log:
Enhance our file_io in APR 1.3 with apr_file_pipe_create_ex
On 11/15/2007 10:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please provide your input to release.
[+1] APR-0.9.17
[ ] APR-1.2.12
[-1] APR-util-1.2.11
[ ] APR-iconv-1.2.1
I've already noticed I should have scuttled testreslist current
implementation,
but that's 20/20 hindsight
On 11/16/2007 10:44 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Solaris 10: All OK except:
testpoll: /Line 314: expected 5, but saw 4
FAILED 1 of 13
testshm : -Line 254: Error destroying shared memory block (22):
Invalid argument
FAILED 1 of 6
Failed TestsTotal
On 11/16/2007 10:44 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/15/2007 10:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please provide your input to release.
[+1] APR-0.9.17
[+1] APR-1.2.12
[-1] APR-util-1.2.11
[ ] APR-iconv-1.2.1
I've already noticed I should have scuttled testreslist current
On 11/19/2007 12:38 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please provide your input to release.
[+1] APR-0.9.17
[+1] APR-1.2.12
[-1] APR-util-1.2.11
[ ] APR-iconv-1.2.1
Fedora 8, i686 and x86_64.
Both apr-0.9.17 and
On 11/19/2007 10:04 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Did you have a look at diffs between 1.2.x and trunk for apr_date.c?
The 1.2.x branch is missing
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=233425 (combo of bug
fixes and support for a new date format and new testcases)
On 11/21/2007 01:45 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate
[+1] APR-util 1.2.12
voting closes Friday afternoon/evening. Windows .zip's with all those
pesky .mak files on their way by morning.
Bill
Signatures: OK
md5sums :
On 11/20/2007 11:30 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please provide your input to release.
[+1] APR-0.9.17
[+1] APR-1.2.12
[XX] APR-util-1.2.11
[+1] APR-iconv-1.2.1
Please note I've withdrawn apr-util-1.2.11 from consideration, and a
1.2.12 package
On 11/21/2007 10:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Wed Nov 21 13:47:07 2007
New Revision: 597218
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=597218view=rev
Log:
Fix the make test target in the spec file.
Modified:
apr/apr/trunk/CHANGES
On 11/26/2007 02:12 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Nov 15, 2007 4:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please provide your input to release.
[ ] APR-iconv-1.2.1
diffs from prior release look reasonable (punted on reviewing Windows
build changes just as I normally punt on
The latest apr-util trunk (r598680) fails to build with httpd if the system
uses an older version of ssl that does not support the EVP features used
by recent commits to apr-util or if you compile apr-util without --with-openssl:
server/.libs/libmain.a(exports.o)(.data.rel+0x160): undefined
On 11/27/2007 09:21 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
The reason for this is that libaprutil does not contain the needed
symbols in this case.
The attached patch should fix this. Comments?
Just took a look - the patch added the symbols when openssl was missing,
which
On 02/12/2008 08:32 PM, Basant Kukreja wrote:
Hi,
I am Basant Kukreja. I was working on apache httpd bug 42580.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42580
I figured out that the cause of the problem might be in APR.
apr_pollset_poll function returns APR_TIMEUP even when
On 02/22/2008 07:40 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
CC'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] since the code in question is in APR.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 05:45:53PM +0100, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
On Feb 22, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
+/*
+ * Try to
On 02/24/2008 03:16 PM, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I'm still not liking the casts and the mixed -1's, APR_SIZE_MAX and
MAX_APR_SIZE_T...
In any case, I'll be busy for most of this weekend so I probably
won't have time to try patches until monday
On 02/24/2008 06:13 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-apr_size_t written;
+int written;
FYI - int is apr_ssize_t, please flip that to a signed representation
that corresponds to sizeof(void*)
Sorry that I don't get it but
- apr_vformatter returns an 'int'
On 04/12/2008 09:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Apr 12 00:22:14 2008
New Revision: 647390
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=647390view=rev
Log:
Introduce apr_pool_pre_cleanup_register
Modified:
apr/apr/trunk/CHANGES
apr/apr/trunk/include/apr_pools.h
On 04/12/2008 03:52 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Rüdiger Plüm wrote:
Its seems that the recent commits from Graham (r647263) and Mladen
(r647384) (APR) broke httpd trunk:
server/.libs/libmain.a(exports.o):(.data+0x9cc): undefined reference
to `apr_pool_create_ex_core_debug'
On 04/13/2008 10:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sun Apr 13 01:31:03 2008
New Revision: 647540
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=647540view=rev
Log:
Introduce apr_pollset_wakeup()
Modified:
apr/apr/trunk/CHANGES
apr/apr/trunk/include/apr_poll.h
On 04/14/2008 10:05 PM, Sander Striker wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 08:42:59AM -, Mladen Turk wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Apr 12 01:42:51 2008
New Revision: 647394
URL:
On 04/14/2008 10:52 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:44:09PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
But now that we have branched 1.3.0 we have to live with it until 2.0, right?
Maybe branching just 48 hours after these commits wasn't such a good idea
especially with these 48 hours being
On 04/14/2008 10:42 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
I am also happy to do the grunt work of reversion if the authors are
still unwilling to resolve these issues and don't want to (or don't have
time to) do that themselves.
Does this mean you revert it on trunk or only on 1.3.x branch? If you revert
On 04/19/2008 06:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Apr 19 09:26:39 2008
New Revision: 649830
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=649830view=rev
Log:
Introduce (again) apr_pollset_wakeup API
Modified:
apr/apr/trunk/CHANGES
apr/apr/trunk/include/apr_poll.h
On 04/24/2008 10:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Thu Apr 24 13:25:55 2008
New Revision: 651395
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=651395view=rev
Log:
Support OS/X sendfile by using writev rather than the miscounted sendfile's
hdtr iovecs.
Submitted by: Geoff Greer
On 04/24/2008 11:09 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Maybe stupid question, but shouldn't this be 1.4.0 instead of 1.3.0 in
the meantime?
Already backported in the meantime, yes I could have applied three commits
but that seemed *really* pedantic.
Ups. My bad. I did
On 05/06/2008 05:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue May 6 08:16:58 2008
New Revision: 653805
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=653805view=rev
Log:
Reduce the point at which we use long filename manipulation to 248
characters, as path names are further constrained to
On 05/07/2008 10:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Wed May 7 13:07:52 2008
New Revision: 654247
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=654247view=rev
Log:
Oops... forgot to combine the CHANGES :)
Modified:
apr/apr/trunk/CHANGES
apr/apr/trunk/network_io/unix/sendrecv.c
On 05/11/2008 08:39 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Actually, I don't understand how this is supposed to work at all.
Having these interfaces in a library means that anything we
pick as a DBD interface must be redistributed with the binaries.
An operating system distro may be able to pick and
On 05/12/2008 09:22 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
In https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42841 ,
Tom points out an issue that gives problems with MySQL
(and possibly other DBD drivers) and suggests that a change
to apr_reslist semantics would fix it. Tom also attaches
a patch
On 05/18/2008 10:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bojan
Date: Sun May 18 01:54:09 2008
New Revision: 657516
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=657516view=rev
Log:
Make sure PGSQL and MySQL drivers count rows from 1, not 0
Modified:
apr/apr-util/trunk/dbd/apr_dbd_mysql.c
On 05/18/2008 11:39 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 11:24 +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I guess this should now be 0?
Depends, really. If we want things to break when users pass in 0, then
it should be the way it is, provided MySQL returns an error when row it
is given is -1
After running make check on APR trunk after quite a while I detected
that testshm fails on Linux with one failure:
testshm : -Line 254: Error destroying shared memory block (2): No
such file or directory
FAILED 1 of 6
Failed TestsTotal FailFailed %
On 05/23/2008 09:28 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2008 20:22:09 +0100
Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42841 ,
Tom points out an issue that gives problems with MySQL
(and possibly other DBD drivers) and suggests that a change
to
On 05/23/2008 10:05 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
More review:
1) the DSO-loading stuff is not thread-safe (dsos global not
mutex-protected) yet apr_ldap_init would/could/should be; it's not
documented to explicitly *not* be thread-safe, anyway.
The caller must
On 05/24/2008 02:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Sat May 24 05:26:43 2008
New Revision: 659802
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=659802view=rev
Log:
Enforce ttl (where used) on individual resources in an apr_reslist
PR 42841
Modified:
apr/apr-util/trunk/CHANGES
On 05/24/2008 07:38 PM, Tom Donovan wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2008 15:04:01 +0200
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for pointing out this that late. I just thought about it again
and I guess we have a leak here. I think the following two lines are
missing here
On 05/24/2008 10:11 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 05/24/2008 07:38 PM, Tom Donovan wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2008 15:04:01 +0200
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think just calling apr_reslist_invalidate will work.
apr_reslist_invalidate assumes
On 05/28/2008 08:10 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
File Name: /srclib/apr-util/misc/apr_reslist.c
Function Name: reslist_cleanup()
Buggy Code:
144: apr_thread_mutex_lock(rl-listlock);
145:
146: while (rl-nidle 0) {
147: res =
On 05/31/2008 12:26 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Unix tarballs are up, win32 .zip's with .mak files will follow.
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-1.3.0 as GA
[ ] Release apr-util-1.3.0 as GA
Some test results from SPARC Solaris (8, 9, 10) with Solaris LDAP SDK.
On 06/03/2008 03:34 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Any comments on belows patches? If not I will commit, but don't cry then if it
breaks some platform on trunk. You have been asked before :-).
Some test results from SPARC Solaris (8, 9, 10) with Solaris LDAP SDK.
All test pass except
On 06/11/2008 03:27 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Tom Donovan wrote:
If there's interest, I have an ODBC DBD driver I would be glad to
contribute.
+1
Regards
Rüdiger
On 06/13/2008 09:27 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Topic for a fun conversation: Should we detab the various
APR source? We've never really instituted a specific coding
style, ala httpd, but 1.3.x might not be a bad place to start.
I'm proposing this for post-1.3.1
On 06/14/2008 10:20 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please don't do this;
---
Revision 663845 - Directory Listing
Modified Fri Jun 6 07:39:52 2008 UTC (8 days, 12 hours ago) by henryjen
backport r663342 from trunk
---
Such commit messages aren't legible when comparing a
On 06/14/2008 10:42 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Guys, if anyone is looking at this, I'll hold off from tagging a bit
longer,
as I'd rather have apr-1.3.1 address all the platform quirks we identified
in preparing 2.2.9 for release. But if I hear nothing, I'll have to
just move ahead :)
On 06/15/2008 06:23 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Subject asks it all, candidates are up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
for your reviewing pleasure... vote away;
+/-1
[ -1 ] Release apr 1.3.1 as GA
[ -0 ] Release apr-util 1.3.1 as GA
Windows .zip's will follow when my head is
On 06/15/2008 01:08 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/15/2008 06:23 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Subject asks it all, candidates are up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
for your reviewing pleasure... vote away;
+/-1
[ -1 ] Release apr 1.3.1 as GA
[ -0 ] Release apr-util 1.3.1
On 06/15/2008 07:39 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
The attached patch fixes this for me, but as I am no autoconf specialist
some remote eyes seem to be a good idea before committing.
Do you know offhand that multiple AC_CACHE_VAL( ac_cv_val, ...) entries
are legit
On 06/16/2008 02:17 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 10:07 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Nah, forget it - wrong and incomplete. Let me do a better one...
OK, for real this time :-)
PS. I don't have RHEL3 platform handy, so please compile and let me
know.
I checked it on Red
On 06/16/2008 12:46 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 08:02 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
The AC_CACHE_VAL should be changed to AC_CACHE_CHECK, which then
provides pretty printing of messages for non-nested version of checks.
Could you check if this works on Solaris?
I tested
On 06/16/2008 11:08 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 22:09 +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I checked it on Red Hat AS 3 and it basicly works, but the 'two argument'
function prototype is wrong. I adjusted your patch accordingly and now
it compiles fine without any warning
@@
*) Add ODBC DBD driver [Tom Donovan]
+ *) Older OpenLDAP implementations may have ldap_set_rebind_proc() with two
+ args. Provide detection code and alternative implementation.
+ [Ruediger Pluem]
+
Thanks, but actually you did most of the work by writing the initial patch.
I only
On 06/17/2008 06:25 PM, Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 16:40, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Candidates will be up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ once the sync
happens within the hour... vote away;
A Cell Blade system: Linux 2.6.22-5.20070920bsc #1
On 06/17/2008 08:55 PM, Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 19:25, Lucian Adrian Grijincu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 16:40, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Candidates will be up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ once the sync
happens
1 - 100 of 337 matches
Mail list logo
