[RESULT][VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.4.1 RC0

Hi, The vote carries with 4 +1 binding votes and 2 +1 non-binding votes. I'll publish this release to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/arrow/ . Thanks, -- kou In <20221117.082136.809288014636861866@clear-code.com> "[VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.4.1 RC0" on Thu,

[DISCUSS] JSON Canonical Extension Type

Hi folks! I put together this specification for canonicalizing the JSON type in Arrow. ## Introduction JSON is a widely used text based data interchange format. There are many use cases where a user has a column whose contents are a JSON encoded string. BigQuery's [JSON Type][1] and Parquet’s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 10.0.1 - RC0

Hi, +1 I've run: TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 10.0.1 0 TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_WHEELS=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 10.0.1 0 TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_BINARIES=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 10.0.1 0 For the yum verification to succeed I had

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 10.0.1 - RC0

Hi, > I had to skip debian:bookworm because of an apparent > upstream issue where "lsb_release" gives "No LSB modules > are available". "docker pull debian:bookworm" will fix it. > I skipped YUM verification because the > gobject-introspection gem failed to build.

Re: [DISCUSS]: Interim plan for new users reporting issues before GitHub migration

Hi! +Inf to Nic's point Asking to write a Gh issue seems to be the easiest Get Outlook for Android From: Nic Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2022 3:12:36 PM To: dev@arrow.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS]: Interim plan for new users reporting

[DISCUSS]: Interim plan for new users reporting issues before GitHub migration

Hi folks, The recent Infra policy change preventing people from signing themselves up for JIRA accounts in order to prevent spam [1] was originally scheduled for 6th November, and though it was slightly delayed, it appears now to be in force. There is ongoing work to do a migration from JIRA to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 10.0.1 - RC0

+1 (binding), AMD64/Linux I had to skip debian:bookworm because of an apparent upstream issue where "lsb_release" gives "No LSB modules are available". I skipped YUM verification because the gobject-introspection gem failed to build. On Thu, Nov 17, 2022, at 09:45, Rok Mihevc wrote: > +1 > >

Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.4.1 RC0

+1 Verified on Intel macOS 13 Neal On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 9:00 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote: > +1 > > Tested on Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS > > El jue, 17 nov 2022 a las 14:42, David Li () > escribió: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Tested on AMD64/Linux (Ubuntu 18.04) > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022, at 07:18,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 10.0.1 - RC0

+1 Passed on M1 with: TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 TEST_PYTHON=0 TEST_GLIB=0 TEST_RUBY=0 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 10.0.1 0 With TEST_PYTHON=1 it reported a CMake issue: -- ArrowPythonFlight version: 10.0.1 -- Found the ArrowPythonFlight shared library:

Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.4.1 RC0

+1 Tested on Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS El jue, 17 nov 2022 a las 14:42, David Li () escribió: > +1 (binding) > > Tested on AMD64/Linux (Ubuntu 18.04) > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022, at 07:18, Eric Hanson wrote: > > +1 > > > > (tested on m1) > > > > On 2022/11/16 23:21:36 Sutou Kouhei wrote: > >> Hi, > >> >

Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.4.1 RC0

+1 (binding) Tested on AMD64/Linux (Ubuntu 18.04) On Thu, Nov 17, 2022, at 07:18, Eric Hanson wrote: > +1 > > (tested on m1) > > On 2022/11/16 23:21:36 Sutou Kouhei wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of >> Apache Arrow Julia version 2.4.1. >> >>

Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.4.1 RC0

+1 (tested on m1) On 2022/11/16 23:21:36 Sutou Kouhei wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of > Apache Arrow Julia version 2.4.1. > > This release candidate is based on commit: > 23258f12bb4b28eb3846d0d3a91a54e2628254d1 [1] > > The source release rc0

Re: Array::GetValue ?

Uh, you're right. We may want another base class, not sure how it should be named though (also, we may want to be careful with multiple inheritance?). Regards Antoine. Le 17/11/2022 à 06:15, Micah Kornfield a écrit : std::string_view FlatArray::GetValueBytes(int64_t index) I think